Metabolic memory in diabetic complications: evidence for persistent cellular states and limits of therapeutic reversal.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Frontiers in Endocrinology Pub Date : 2026-10-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fendo.2026.1954392
Yulan Cai, Shuangyu He, Feng Zeng, Chuyu Liu
{"title":"Metabolic memory in diabetic complications: evidence for persistent cellular states and limits of therapeutic reversal.","authors":"Yulan Cai, Shuangyu He, Feng Zeng, Chuyu Liu","doi":"10.3389/fendo.2026.1954392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metabolic memory is defined here as an exposure-history-dependent cellular phenotype that persists beyond immediate carry-over after verified withdrawal of the initiating exposure, principally high glucose and is accompanied by a specified functional impairment or an altered response to the same defined secondary stimulus. This operational definition separates cellular memory from clinical legacy effects, continuing local stimulation and residual structural injury. We critically examine evidence from longitudinal clinical studies, human biospecimens, animal models and controlled cell experiments, distinguishing molecular persistence, measured signaling activity, causal maintenance and treatment-free durability. DCCT/EDIC and UKPDS establish lasting benefits of earlier glycemic management but do not independently identify cellular memory as the mechanism. Experimental evidence supports selected endothelial redox circuits, epigenetic regulation and hematopoietic progenitor training; human causal evidence is substantially more limited. Persistent chromatin marks do not necessarily imply continuously active signaling, and latent priming may become apparent only after rechallenge. In kidney, cardiovascular, retinal and wound disease, candidate cellular memory coexists with hypoxic or inflammatory niches and structural loss. Pancreatic β-cell plasticity is considered a comparative endocrine model rather than an established complication-memory circuit. The proposed interactions among epigenetic, mitochondrial, metabolic and inflammatory mechanisms remain a framework supported by selected local feedback loops, not a universally demonstrated network. Therapeutic evidence is organized into prevention, modification or suppression of established abnormalities, and sustained molecular and functional recovery after treatment cessation after intervention withdrawal. The latter remains unestablished in patients for the mechanisms reviewed. Early glycemic and multifactorial management remains essential, while mechanistic translation requires explicit recovery, perturbation and post-treatment follow-up designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12447,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1954392"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13678445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2026.1954392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metabolic memory is defined here as an exposure-history-dependent cellular phenotype that persists beyond immediate carry-over after verified withdrawal of the initiating exposure, principally high glucose and is accompanied by a specified functional impairment or an altered response to the same defined secondary stimulus. This operational definition separates cellular memory from clinical legacy effects, continuing local stimulation and residual structural injury. We critically examine evidence from longitudinal clinical studies, human biospecimens, animal models and controlled cell experiments, distinguishing molecular persistence, measured signaling activity, causal maintenance and treatment-free durability. DCCT/EDIC and UKPDS establish lasting benefits of earlier glycemic management but do not independently identify cellular memory as the mechanism. Experimental evidence supports selected endothelial redox circuits, epigenetic regulation and hematopoietic progenitor training; human causal evidence is substantially more limited. Persistent chromatin marks do not necessarily imply continuously active signaling, and latent priming may become apparent only after rechallenge. In kidney, cardiovascular, retinal and wound disease, candidate cellular memory coexists with hypoxic or inflammatory niches and structural loss. Pancreatic β-cell plasticity is considered a comparative endocrine model rather than an established complication-memory circuit. The proposed interactions among epigenetic, mitochondrial, metabolic and inflammatory mechanisms remain a framework supported by selected local feedback loops, not a universally demonstrated network. Therapeutic evidence is organized into prevention, modification or suppression of established abnormalities, and sustained molecular and functional recovery after treatment cessation after intervention withdrawal. The latter remains unestablished in patients for the mechanisms reviewed. Early glycemic and multifactorial management remains essential, while mechanistic translation requires explicit recovery, perturbation and post-treatment follow-up designs.

糖尿病并发症中的代谢记忆:持续细胞状态的证据和治疗逆转的限制。
代谢记忆在这里被定义为一种依赖于暴露史的细胞表型,在初始暴露(主要是高葡萄糖)被证实退出后持续存在,并伴有特定的功能损伤或对相同定义的次要刺激的改变反应。这个操作定义将细胞记忆与临床遗留效应、持续局部刺激和残余结构损伤分开。我们严格检查来自纵向临床研究、人类生物标本、动物模型和对照细胞实验的证据,区分分子持久性、测量信号活性、因果维持和无治疗持久性。DCCT/EDIC和UKPDS确立了早期血糖管理的持久益处,但没有独立地确定细胞记忆作为机制。实验证据支持选择内皮氧化还原回路,表观遗传调控和造血祖细胞训练;人类的因果证据要有限得多。持续的染色质标记并不一定意味着持续活跃的信号传导,潜在的启动可能只有在重新激活后才会变得明显。在肾脏、心血管、视网膜和伤口疾病中,候选细胞记忆与缺氧或炎症性壁龛和结构丢失共存。胰腺β细胞可塑性被认为是一种比较内分泌模型,而不是一种既定的并发症-记忆回路。表观遗传、线粒体、代谢和炎症机制之间的相互作用仍然是一个由局部反馈回路支持的框架,而不是一个普遍证明的网络。治疗证据被组织为预防、改变或抑制已建立的异常,以及在干预退出后停止治疗后持续的分子和功能恢复。后一种机制仍未在患者中建立。早期血糖和多因素管理仍然是必要的,而机制翻译需要明确的恢复,扰动和治疗后随访设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Frontiers in Endocrinology Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
3023
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Endocrinology is a field journal of the "Frontiers in" journal series. In today’s world, endocrinology is becoming increasingly important as it underlies many of the challenges societies face - from obesity and diabetes to reproduction, population control and aging. Endocrinology covers a broad field from basic molecular and cellular communication through to clinical care and some of the most crucial public health issues. The journal, thus, welcomes outstanding contributions in any domain of endocrinology. Frontiers in Endocrinology publishes articles on the most outstanding discoveries across a wide research spectrum of Endocrinology. The mission of Frontiers in Endocrinology is to bring all relevant Endocrinology areas together on a single platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书