Oesophagectomy following endoscopic resection for oesophageal carcinoma: A Dutch nationwide retrospective cohort study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2026-10-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2026.112326
Merel A de Kock, Oleksandr Khoma, Matteo Pittacolo, Pieter C van der Sluis, Sjoerd M Lagarde, Arjun D Koch, Manon C W Spaander, Suzan Nikkessen, Bas P L Wijnhoven
{"title":"Oesophagectomy following endoscopic resection for oesophageal carcinoma: A Dutch nationwide retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Merel A de Kock, Oleksandr Khoma, Matteo Pittacolo, Pieter C van der Sluis, Sjoerd M Lagarde, Arjun D Koch, Manon C W Spaander, Suzan Nikkessen, Bas P L Wijnhoven","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.112326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic resection is the standard treatment for early-stage oesophageal carcinoma, but oesophagectomy is recommended when margins are involved or histopathological features suggest a high risk of lymph node metastasis. This study evaluated residual malignancy after endoscopic resection and the accuracy of postoperative risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) for patients who underwent oesophagectomy after endoscopic resection between 2011 and 2019. Surgical decisions were guided by multidisciplinary team discussion based on endoscopic, radiological and histological risk factors. Outcomes included the presence of residual tumour, discrepancies between clinical and pathological staging, and surgical morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes were compared with those of patients undergoing oesophagectomy for locally advanced disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 patients were included, with a median age of 67 years. Residual tumour was identified in 67%, with 63% having intramural tumour and 18.5% lymph node metastases. Clinical-pathological stage discordance occurred in 63% of patients, comprising 24% upstaging and 39% downstaging. Postoperative complications occurred in 61% of patients, with 21.2% experiencing severe complications. The 30-day or in-hospital mortality rate was 1.4%, comparable to outcomes for patients with locally advanced disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Residual tumour was identified in two-thirds of patients undergoing oesophagectomy after endoscopic resection, with nearly one fifth demonstrating lymph node involvement. Clinical-pathological staging discrepancies were frequent, highlighting limitations in current post-endoscopic risk assessment. These findings apply to a selected subgroup of patients who proceeded to oesophagectomy after endoscopic resection and should not be interpreted as evidence that R0 endoscopic resection is generally non-curative for most early oesophageal cancers. Postoperative outcomes mirrored those of patients undergoing surgery for advanced disease, underscoring the importance of improved risk stratification to reduce overtreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"53 1","pages":"112326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2026.112326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic resection is the standard treatment for early-stage oesophageal carcinoma, but oesophagectomy is recommended when margins are involved or histopathological features suggest a high risk of lymph node metastasis. This study evaluated residual malignancy after endoscopic resection and the accuracy of postoperative risk stratification.

Methods: Data were extracted from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) for patients who underwent oesophagectomy after endoscopic resection between 2011 and 2019. Surgical decisions were guided by multidisciplinary team discussion based on endoscopic, radiological and histological risk factors. Outcomes included the presence of residual tumour, discrepancies between clinical and pathological staging, and surgical morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes were compared with those of patients undergoing oesophagectomy for locally advanced disease.

Results: A total of 146 patients were included, with a median age of 67 years. Residual tumour was identified in 67%, with 63% having intramural tumour and 18.5% lymph node metastases. Clinical-pathological stage discordance occurred in 63% of patients, comprising 24% upstaging and 39% downstaging. Postoperative complications occurred in 61% of patients, with 21.2% experiencing severe complications. The 30-day or in-hospital mortality rate was 1.4%, comparable to outcomes for patients with locally advanced disease.

Conclusion: Residual tumour was identified in two-thirds of patients undergoing oesophagectomy after endoscopic resection, with nearly one fifth demonstrating lymph node involvement. Clinical-pathological staging discrepancies were frequent, highlighting limitations in current post-endoscopic risk assessment. These findings apply to a selected subgroup of patients who proceeded to oesophagectomy after endoscopic resection and should not be interpreted as evidence that R0 endoscopic resection is generally non-curative for most early oesophageal cancers. Postoperative outcomes mirrored those of patients undergoing surgery for advanced disease, underscoring the importance of improved risk stratification to reduce overtreatment.

食管癌内镜切除后食管切除术:荷兰全国回顾性队列研究。
背景:内镜切除是早期食管癌的标准治疗方法,但当边缘受损伤或组织病理学特征提示淋巴结转移风险高时,建议行食管切除术。本研究评估内镜切除后残留的恶性肿瘤及术后风险分层的准确性。方法:从荷兰上消化道癌症审计(DUCA)中提取2011年至2019年期间内镜切除食管切除术患者的数据。手术决定由多学科小组讨论指导,基于内镜、放射学和组织学危险因素。结果包括残留肿瘤的存在,临床和病理分期的差异,手术发病率和死亡率。次要结果与局部晚期食道切除术患者的次要结果进行比较。结果:共纳入146例患者,中位年龄67岁。残留肿瘤占67%,其中63%为壁内肿瘤,18.5%为淋巴结转移。63%的患者出现临床-病理分期不一致,包括24%的高分期和39%的低分期。61%的患者出现术后并发症,其中21.2%出现严重并发症。30天或住院死亡率为1.4%,与局部晚期疾病患者的结果相当。结论:内镜下食管癌切除术后三分之二的患者发现肿瘤残留,近五分之一的患者表现出淋巴结累及。临床病理分期差异频繁,突出了目前内镜后风险评估的局限性。这些发现适用于内镜切除后进行食管切除术的患者亚组,不应被解释为R0内镜切除通常对大多数早期食管癌无效的证据。术后结果反映了晚期疾病手术患者的结果,强调了改善风险分层以减少过度治疗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书