Circulating musclin as a potential prognostic biomarker for major adverse cardiovascular events in surgically treated acute aortic dissection: a retrospective cohort study.
{"title":"Circulating musclin as a potential prognostic biomarker for major adverse cardiovascular events in surgically treated acute aortic dissection: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Jia Liu, Zhihui Liu, Liang Guo, Zhiyuan Wang, Jinfang Wu, Xiaobing Li, Huijun Zhang, Huining Liu","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2026.1953235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Musclin is a skeletal muscle-derived myokine with reported cardioprotective effects; however, its prognostic relevance in acute aortic dissection (AAD) remains uncertain. This study examined whether admission Musclin levels were associated with postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and whether they added prognostic information beyond conventional clinical indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled 108 surgically treated AAD patients from 2022 to 2023. Musclin levels were measured by ELISA in residual serum samples collected at admission. The primary endpoint was composite MACE. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, multivariate Cox regression, time-dependent ROC, IDI and NRI were used to evaluate the predictive and incremental value of Musclin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 400-day follow-up, 36 patients (33.3%) developed MACE. The CART-derived optimal Musclin cutoff was 4.815 ng/mL. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that low Musclin group had significantly higher MACE cumulative incidence than high Musclin group (48.2% vs. 17.3%, log-rank <i>P</i> < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed circulating Musclin associated with a lower risk of MACE (HR = 0.314, 95%CI: 0.104-0.943, <i>P</i> = 0.039). Time-dependent AUC analysis demonstrated that the combined model incorporating Musclin (model 2) achieved superior AUC compared with the clinical model (model 1). Even at the 250-day time point, where the incremental gain (<i>Δ</i>AUC) was minimal, the combined model still exhibited significantly better discriminative performance (0.876 vs. 0.837, DeLong <i>P</i> = 0.013). At the 250-day landmark, IDI was 0.153 (95%CI: 0.018-0.286, <i>P</i> = 0.012) and overall NRI was 0.167 (95%CI: 0.003-0.336, <i>P</i> = 0.044), with event-specific NRI reaching 0.361 (<i>P</i> = 0.012). Sensitivity analyses yielded directionally consistent associations when Musclin was analyzed using the cohort median or as a continuous variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this single-center retrospective cohort, lower admission Musclin was associated with a higher risk of postoperative MACE. Musclin may be a severity-related biomarker that could complement conventional risk indicators, but its independent clinical utility, optimal threshold, and role in risk stratification require prospective multicenter validation with comprehensive perioperative adjustment before clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"13 ","pages":"1953235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13677462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1953235","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Musclin is a skeletal muscle-derived myokine with reported cardioprotective effects; however, its prognostic relevance in acute aortic dissection (AAD) remains uncertain. This study examined whether admission Musclin levels were associated with postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and whether they added prognostic information beyond conventional clinical indicators.
Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 108 surgically treated AAD patients from 2022 to 2023. Musclin levels were measured by ELISA in residual serum samples collected at admission. The primary endpoint was composite MACE. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, multivariate Cox regression, time-dependent ROC, IDI and NRI were used to evaluate the predictive and incremental value of Musclin.
Results: During 400-day follow-up, 36 patients (33.3%) developed MACE. The CART-derived optimal Musclin cutoff was 4.815 ng/mL. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that low Musclin group had significantly higher MACE cumulative incidence than high Musclin group (48.2% vs. 17.3%, log-rank P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed circulating Musclin associated with a lower risk of MACE (HR = 0.314, 95%CI: 0.104-0.943, P = 0.039). Time-dependent AUC analysis demonstrated that the combined model incorporating Musclin (model 2) achieved superior AUC compared with the clinical model (model 1). Even at the 250-day time point, where the incremental gain (ΔAUC) was minimal, the combined model still exhibited significantly better discriminative performance (0.876 vs. 0.837, DeLong P = 0.013). At the 250-day landmark, IDI was 0.153 (95%CI: 0.018-0.286, P = 0.012) and overall NRI was 0.167 (95%CI: 0.003-0.336, P = 0.044), with event-specific NRI reaching 0.361 (P = 0.012). Sensitivity analyses yielded directionally consistent associations when Musclin was analyzed using the cohort median or as a continuous variable.
Conclusions: In this single-center retrospective cohort, lower admission Musclin was associated with a higher risk of postoperative MACE. Musclin may be a severity-related biomarker that could complement conventional risk indicators, but its independent clinical utility, optimal threshold, and role in risk stratification require prospective multicenter validation with comprehensive perioperative adjustment before clinical use.
背景:Musclin是一种骨骼肌来源的肌肉因子,具有心脏保护作用;然而,其与急性主动脉夹层(AAD)的预后相关性仍不确定。本研究考察了入院时Musclin水平是否与术后主要不良心血管事件(MACE)相关,以及它们是否在常规临床指标之外增加了预后信息。方法:我们回顾性地纳入了2022年至2023年108例手术治疗的AAD患者。采用ELISA法测定入院时采集的残留血清中的肌素水平。主要终点为复合MACE。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析、多变量Cox回归、随时间变化的ROC、IDI和NRI评价Musclin的预测价值和增量价值。结果:在400天的随访中,36例(33.3%)发生MACE。cart导出的最佳Musclin截止值为4.815 ng/mL。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,低Musclin组MACE累积发生率显著高于高Musclin组(48.2%比17.3%,log-rank P = 0.039)。时间相关的AUC分析表明,与临床模型(模型1)相比,纳入Musclin的联合模型(模型2)获得了更好的AUC。即使在增量增益(ΔAUC)最小的250天时间点,联合模型仍然表现出明显更好的判别性能(0.876 vs. 0.837, DeLong P = 0.013)。在250天的里程碑,IDI为0.153 (95%CI: 0.018-0.286, P = 0.012),总体NRI为0.167 (95%CI: 0.003-0.336, P = 0.044),事件特异性NRI达到0.361 (P = 0.012)。当使用队列中位数或作为连续变量分析Musclin时,敏感性分析得出方向一致的关联。结论:在这一单中心回顾性队列研究中,较低的入院率与较高的术后MACE风险相关。Musclin可能是一种与严重程度相关的生物标志物,可以补充传统的风险指标,但其独立的临床用途、最佳阈值和在风险分层中的作用需要在临床使用前进行前瞻性的多中心验证和全面的围手术期调整。
期刊介绍:
Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers?
At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.