Does adding a mandibular mentoplate improve long-term Class III treatment?

IF 2.9 Q3 Dentistry
A Selva Arockiam
{"title":"Does adding a mandibular mentoplate improve long-term Class III treatment?","authors":"A Selva Arockiam","doi":"10.1038/s41432-026-01275-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>A commentary on: </strong>Meyns J, Meewis J, Dons F, Schreurs A, Aerts J, Shujaat S, Politis C, Jacobs R. Long-term comparison of maxillary protraction with hybrid hyrax-facemask vs. hybrid hyrax-mentoplate protocols using Alt-RAMEC: a 5-year randomised controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2025;47(2):cjaf011. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf011 .</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-centre two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial with 1:1 allocation and 5-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Case selection: </strong>Twenty-eight children in the mixed dentition with skeletal Class III malocclusion were recruited. Eligible patients had an anterior crossbite or edge-to-edge incisor relationship and a Class III molar relationship. Children with craniofacial syndromes, previous orthodontic or surgical treatment, marked skeletal asymmetry or functional Class III malocclusion were excluded. Participants were allocated to hybrid Hyrax plus facemask therapy or hybrid Hyrax plus mandibular mentoplate therapy. Both groups received Alt-RAMEC.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Low-dose computed tomography was performed at baseline, 1 year and 5 years. Virtual lateral cephalograms were used to assess Wits appraisal as the primary outcome with skeletal and dentoalveolar variables as secondary outcomes. Between-group comparisons used unpaired two-sided t tests. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis were blinded. Measurement reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four of 28 randomised participants contributed data at 5 years. Wits appraisal improved by 4.42 mm with facemask treatment and 2.86 mm with mentoplate treatment at 1 year. At 5 years the corresponding improvements from baseline were 3.33 mm and 1.50 mm. Between-group differences were not statistically significant. Long-term vertical skeletal measures and incisor inclination were also comparable. Minor hook fracture and mucosal irritation occurred without treatment discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding a mandibular mentoplate did not demonstrate superior long-term skeletal correction over hybrid Hyrax plus facemask treatment in this small trial. The findings support selective rather than routine use of the more invasive approach. They do not establish equivalence between the protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-026-01275-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A commentary on: Meyns J, Meewis J, Dons F, Schreurs A, Aerts J, Shujaat S, Politis C, Jacobs R. Long-term comparison of maxillary protraction with hybrid hyrax-facemask vs. hybrid hyrax-mentoplate protocols using Alt-RAMEC: a 5-year randomised controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2025;47(2):cjaf011. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf011 .

Design: Single-centre two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial with 1:1 allocation and 5-year follow-up.

Case selection: Twenty-eight children in the mixed dentition with skeletal Class III malocclusion were recruited. Eligible patients had an anterior crossbite or edge-to-edge incisor relationship and a Class III molar relationship. Children with craniofacial syndromes, previous orthodontic or surgical treatment, marked skeletal asymmetry or functional Class III malocclusion were excluded. Participants were allocated to hybrid Hyrax plus facemask therapy or hybrid Hyrax plus mandibular mentoplate therapy. Both groups received Alt-RAMEC.

Data analysis: Low-dose computed tomography was performed at baseline, 1 year and 5 years. Virtual lateral cephalograms were used to assess Wits appraisal as the primary outcome with skeletal and dentoalveolar variables as secondary outcomes. Between-group comparisons used unpaired two-sided t tests. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis were blinded. Measurement reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.

Results: Twenty-four of 28 randomised participants contributed data at 5 years. Wits appraisal improved by 4.42 mm with facemask treatment and 2.86 mm with mentoplate treatment at 1 year. At 5 years the corresponding improvements from baseline were 3.33 mm and 1.50 mm. Between-group differences were not statistically significant. Long-term vertical skeletal measures and incisor inclination were also comparable. Minor hook fracture and mucosal irritation occurred without treatment discontinuation.

Conclusions: Adding a mandibular mentoplate did not demonstrate superior long-term skeletal correction over hybrid Hyrax plus facemask treatment in this small trial. The findings support selective rather than routine use of the more invasive approach. They do not establish equivalence between the protocols.

添加下颌薄荷托板是否能改善长期III类治疗?
Meyns J, Meewis J, Dons F, Schreurs A, Aerts J, Shujaat S, Politis C, Jacobs R.混合hyrax-面罩与混合hyrax-mentoplate方案上颌牵引的长期比较:一项5年随机对照试验。中华骨科杂志,2015;47(2):cjaf011。https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf011。设计:单中心双臂平行随机对照试验,1:1分配,5年随访。病例选择:选取混合牙列骨性III类错牙合患儿28例。符合条件的患者有前牙合或门牙边缘对边缘关系和III类磨牙关系。排除颅面综合征、既往正畸或手术治疗、明显骨骼不对称或功能性III类错颌合的儿童。参与者被分配到混合Hyrax加面罩治疗或混合Hyrax加下颌薄荷板治疗。两组均接受Alt-RAMEC治疗。资料分析:在基线、1年和5年进行低剂量计算机断层扫描。虚拟侧位脑电图用于评估Wits评估作为主要结果,骨骼和牙槽骨变量作为次要结果。组间比较采用非配对双侧t检验。结果评估和统计分析采用盲法。采用类内相关系数评估测量信度。结果:28名随机参与者中有24人提供了5年的数据。1年后,蒙面组和薄荷托板组的智力评价分别提高了4.42 mm和2.86 mm。与基线相比,5年的相应改善分别为3.33毫米和1.50毫米。组间差异无统计学意义。长期垂直骨骼测量和门牙倾斜也具有可比性。在未停止治疗的情况下发生轻微钩状骨折和粘膜刺激。结论:在这个小型试验中,添加下颌mentoplate并没有表现出比Hyrax +面罩混合治疗更优越的长期骨骼矫正。研究结果支持选择性而非常规的侵入性方法。它们不建立协议之间的等价性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evidence-based dentistry
Evidence-based dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书