{"title":"Does adding a mandibular mentoplate improve long-term Class III treatment?","authors":"A Selva Arockiam","doi":"10.1038/s41432-026-01275-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>A commentary on: </strong>Meyns J, Meewis J, Dons F, Schreurs A, Aerts J, Shujaat S, Politis C, Jacobs R. Long-term comparison of maxillary protraction with hybrid hyrax-facemask vs. hybrid hyrax-mentoplate protocols using Alt-RAMEC: a 5-year randomised controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2025;47(2):cjaf011. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf011 .</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-centre two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial with 1:1 allocation and 5-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Case selection: </strong>Twenty-eight children in the mixed dentition with skeletal Class III malocclusion were recruited. Eligible patients had an anterior crossbite or edge-to-edge incisor relationship and a Class III molar relationship. Children with craniofacial syndromes, previous orthodontic or surgical treatment, marked skeletal asymmetry or functional Class III malocclusion were excluded. Participants were allocated to hybrid Hyrax plus facemask therapy or hybrid Hyrax plus mandibular mentoplate therapy. Both groups received Alt-RAMEC.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Low-dose computed tomography was performed at baseline, 1 year and 5 years. Virtual lateral cephalograms were used to assess Wits appraisal as the primary outcome with skeletal and dentoalveolar variables as secondary outcomes. Between-group comparisons used unpaired two-sided t tests. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis were blinded. Measurement reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four of 28 randomised participants contributed data at 5 years. Wits appraisal improved by 4.42 mm with facemask treatment and 2.86 mm with mentoplate treatment at 1 year. At 5 years the corresponding improvements from baseline were 3.33 mm and 1.50 mm. Between-group differences were not statistically significant. Long-term vertical skeletal measures and incisor inclination were also comparable. Minor hook fracture and mucosal irritation occurred without treatment discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding a mandibular mentoplate did not demonstrate superior long-term skeletal correction over hybrid Hyrax plus facemask treatment in this small trial. The findings support selective rather than routine use of the more invasive approach. They do not establish equivalence between the protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-026-01275-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A commentary on: Meyns J, Meewis J, Dons F, Schreurs A, Aerts J, Shujaat S, Politis C, Jacobs R. Long-term comparison of maxillary protraction with hybrid hyrax-facemask vs. hybrid hyrax-mentoplate protocols using Alt-RAMEC: a 5-year randomised controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2025;47(2):cjaf011. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf011 .
Design: Single-centre two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial with 1:1 allocation and 5-year follow-up.
Case selection: Twenty-eight children in the mixed dentition with skeletal Class III malocclusion were recruited. Eligible patients had an anterior crossbite or edge-to-edge incisor relationship and a Class III molar relationship. Children with craniofacial syndromes, previous orthodontic or surgical treatment, marked skeletal asymmetry or functional Class III malocclusion were excluded. Participants were allocated to hybrid Hyrax plus facemask therapy or hybrid Hyrax plus mandibular mentoplate therapy. Both groups received Alt-RAMEC.
Data analysis: Low-dose computed tomography was performed at baseline, 1 year and 5 years. Virtual lateral cephalograms were used to assess Wits appraisal as the primary outcome with skeletal and dentoalveolar variables as secondary outcomes. Between-group comparisons used unpaired two-sided t tests. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis were blinded. Measurement reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.
Results: Twenty-four of 28 randomised participants contributed data at 5 years. Wits appraisal improved by 4.42 mm with facemask treatment and 2.86 mm with mentoplate treatment at 1 year. At 5 years the corresponding improvements from baseline were 3.33 mm and 1.50 mm. Between-group differences were not statistically significant. Long-term vertical skeletal measures and incisor inclination were also comparable. Minor hook fracture and mucosal irritation occurred without treatment discontinuation.
Conclusions: Adding a mandibular mentoplate did not demonstrate superior long-term skeletal correction over hybrid Hyrax plus facemask treatment in this small trial. The findings support selective rather than routine use of the more invasive approach. They do not establish equivalence between the protocols.
期刊介绍:
Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.