Clinical evidence of acupressure for improving chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Complementary therapies in medicine Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2026.103459
Xiao-min Quan, Wen-yi Wang, Ze-yu He, Yu Gao, Hong-yang Chen, Xun Li, Chao An, Qi-biao Wu, Guan-hu Yang
{"title":"Clinical evidence of acupressure for improving chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Xiao-min Quan,&nbsp;Wen-yi Wang,&nbsp;Ze-yu He,&nbsp;Yu Gao,&nbsp;Hong-yang Chen,&nbsp;Xun Li,&nbsp;Chao An,&nbsp;Qi-biao Wu,&nbsp;Guan-hu Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ctim.2026.103459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of acupressure for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in breast cancer patients, and to provide a reliable evidence-based medical basis for acupressure therapy in the management of CINV in this patient population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nine databases were searched for clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on acupressure for the treatment of CINV in breast cancer patients, with the search period ranging from the inception of each database to August 1, 2025. The protocol of this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD420251119218). Two reviewers independently conducted literature screening and data extraction, and used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.0 software, and the GRADE system was applied to assess the evidence quality of outcome measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 39 studies were included, involving 3501 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that, as an adjuvant therapy to conventional antiemetic drugs, acupressure significantly improved the response rate for CINV relief (acute phase: RR 1.35, 95%CI 1.17–1.55; delayed phase: RR 1.41, 95%CI 1.19–1.66) and reduced its incidence (acute phase: RR 0.78, 95%CI 0.66–0.91; delayed phase: RR 0.58, 95%CI 0.45–0.75), with the evidence quality for outcomes in the acute phase rated as moderate. Compared with blank control, acupressure significantly improved patients’ anxiety (MD −3.08, 95%CI −4.33 to −1.83) and depression (MD −4.15, 95%CI −4.86 to −3.43) statuses, and increased patient satisfaction (RR 1.24, 95%CI 1.11–1.39). However, acupressure alone did not show superiority over conventional antiemetic treatment in terms of most outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This systematic review and meta-analysis found that acupressure, as an adjunct to standard antiemetic regimens, can effectively ameliorate CINV in breast cancer patients—particularly delayed-phase symptoms—and improve patients’ mental health and treatment satisfaction. Limited by the methodological quality and heterogeneity of the included studies, the strength of the current evidence requires further enhancement. Future research should conduct more high-quality, standardized clinical trials to further validate its efficacy and provide more robust evidence-based support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10545,"journal":{"name":"Complementary therapies in medicine","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 103459"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary therapies in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229926001421","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of acupressure for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in breast cancer patients, and to provide a reliable evidence-based medical basis for acupressure therapy in the management of CINV in this patient population.

Methods

Nine databases were searched for clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on acupressure for the treatment of CINV in breast cancer patients, with the search period ranging from the inception of each database to August 1, 2025. The protocol of this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD420251119218). Two reviewers independently conducted literature screening and data extraction, and used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.0 software, and the GRADE system was applied to assess the evidence quality of outcome measures.

Results

A total of 39 studies were included, involving 3501 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that, as an adjuvant therapy to conventional antiemetic drugs, acupressure significantly improved the response rate for CINV relief (acute phase: RR 1.35, 95%CI 1.17–1.55; delayed phase: RR 1.41, 95%CI 1.19–1.66) and reduced its incidence (acute phase: RR 0.78, 95%CI 0.66–0.91; delayed phase: RR 0.58, 95%CI 0.45–0.75), with the evidence quality for outcomes in the acute phase rated as moderate. Compared with blank control, acupressure significantly improved patients’ anxiety (MD −3.08, 95%CI −4.33 to −1.83) and depression (MD −4.15, 95%CI −4.86 to −3.43) statuses, and increased patient satisfaction (RR 1.24, 95%CI 1.11–1.39). However, acupressure alone did not show superiority over conventional antiemetic treatment in terms of most outcomes.

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that acupressure, as an adjunct to standard antiemetic regimens, can effectively ameliorate CINV in breast cancer patients—particularly delayed-phase symptoms—and improve patients’ mental health and treatment satisfaction. Limited by the methodological quality and heterogeneity of the included studies, the strength of the current evidence requires further enhancement. Future research should conduct more high-quality, standardized clinical trials to further validate its efficacy and provide more robust evidence-based support.
穴位按压改善乳腺癌化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的临床证据:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:系统评价穴位按压治疗乳腺癌化疗性恶心呕吐(CINV)的临床疗效,为穴位按压治疗乳腺癌患者化疗性恶心呕吐(CINV)提供可靠的循证医学依据。方法:检索9个数据库,检索穴位按压治疗乳腺癌患者CINV的临床随机对照试验(RCTs),检索时间从每个数据库建立到2025年8月1日。本荟萃分析的方案已在PROSPERO注册(注册号:CRD420251119218)。两位审稿人独立进行文献筛选和数据提取,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。采用Review Manager 5.4和Stata 15.0软件进行统计分析,并采用GRADE系统评估结果测量的证据质量。结果:共纳入39项研究,涉及3501例患者。荟萃分析结果显示,穴位按压作为常规止吐药物的辅助治疗,可显著提高CINV缓解率(急性期:RR 1.35, 95%CI 1.17 ~ 1.55;延迟期:RR 1.41, 95%CI 1.19 ~ 1.66),降低其发生率(急性期:RR 0.78, 95%CI 0.66 ~ 0.91;延迟期:RR 0.58, 95%CI 0.45 ~ 0.75),急性期结局的证据质量为中等。与空白对照相比,穴位按压可显著改善患者焦虑(MD -3.08, 95%CI -4.33 ~ -1.83)和抑郁(MD -4.15, 95%CI -4.86 ~ -3.43)状态,提高患者满意度(RR 1.24, 95%CI 1.11 ~ 1.39)。然而,就大多数结果而言,单独穴位按压并不优于常规止吐治疗。结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析发现,穴位按压作为标准止吐方案的辅助疗法,可以有效改善乳腺癌患者的CINV,特别是延迟期症状,并改善患者的心理健康和治疗满意度。受纳入研究的方法学质量和异质性的限制,目前证据的强度需要进一步加强。未来的研究应开展更多高质量、标准化的临床试验,以进一步验证其疗效,并提供更有力的循证支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complementary therapies in medicine
Complementary therapies in medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
101
审稿时长
112 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal that has considerable appeal to anyone who seeks objective and critical information on complementary therapies or who wishes to deepen their understanding of these approaches. It will be of particular interest to healthcare practitioners including family practitioners, complementary therapists, nurses, and physiotherapists; to academics including social scientists and CAM researchers; to healthcare managers; and to patients. Complementary Therapies in Medicine aims to publish valid, relevant and rigorous research and serious discussion articles with the main purpose of improving healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书