Needs among persons with advanced COPD and their informal caregivers: a multi-perspective qualitative study focusing on the potential role of palliative care.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Kira Schmidt-Stiedenroth, Julia Salandi, Alexandra Schmidt, Balam Er Dedekarginoglu, Stefanie Paniczek, Manuela Schallenburger, Anette Scholz, Jacqueline Schwartz, Kathrin Fricke, Stefanie Keymel, Achim Mortsiefer, Martin Neukirchen, Adrian Loerbroks
{"title":"Needs among persons with advanced COPD and their informal caregivers: a multi-perspective qualitative study focusing on the potential role of palliative care.","authors":"Kira Schmidt-Stiedenroth, Julia Salandi, Alexandra Schmidt, Balam Er Dedekarginoglu, Stefanie Paniczek, Manuela Schallenburger, Anette Scholz, Jacqueline Schwartz, Kathrin Fricke, Stefanie Keymel, Achim Mortsiefer, Martin Neukirchen, Adrian Loerbroks","doi":"10.1186/s12890-026-04828-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore needs among persons with advanced COPD and informal caregivers, and to explore how palliative care can address those needs.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>COPD is a common, progressive disease affecting lung function and represents a leading cause of death. Advanced COPD is associated with a high symptom burden and poor quality of life. Persons with advanced COPD may benefit from palliative care, but its use among persons with COPD remains limited, also in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative, multi-perspective interview study was conducted with persons suffering from advanced COPD, informal caregivers, and formal caregivers (general practitioners, pulmonologists, and palliative care physicians). A total of 53 interviews were analysed following structuring (Kuckartz') as well as latent content analysis methods using MAXQDA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key needs were identified in the following domains (1) management of dyspnoea and anxiety, (2) home-based healthcare, (3) emergency planning and support, (4) psychosocial care, (5) organisational support, and (6) timely information about COPD and palliative care. Persons who had previously received PC reported various needs met in the first five areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Persons with advanced COPD and their informal caregivers reported numerous needs. Persons receiving palliative care reported relief from various needs. Timely information about COPD's progression and palliative care could increase acceptance and thus use of palliative care among these persons and could consequently reduce or curtail the burden of living with advanced COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-026-04828-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore needs among persons with advanced COPD and informal caregivers, and to explore how palliative care can address those needs.

Background: COPD is a common, progressive disease affecting lung function and represents a leading cause of death. Advanced COPD is associated with a high symptom burden and poor quality of life. Persons with advanced COPD may benefit from palliative care, but its use among persons with COPD remains limited, also in Germany.

Methods: A qualitative, multi-perspective interview study was conducted with persons suffering from advanced COPD, informal caregivers, and formal caregivers (general practitioners, pulmonologists, and palliative care physicians). A total of 53 interviews were analysed following structuring (Kuckartz') as well as latent content analysis methods using MAXQDA.

Results: Key needs were identified in the following domains (1) management of dyspnoea and anxiety, (2) home-based healthcare, (3) emergency planning and support, (4) psychosocial care, (5) organisational support, and (6) timely information about COPD and palliative care. Persons who had previously received PC reported various needs met in the first five areas.

Conclusions: Persons with advanced COPD and their informal caregivers reported numerous needs. Persons receiving palliative care reported relief from various needs. Timely information about COPD's progression and palliative care could increase acceptance and thus use of palliative care among these persons and could consequently reduce or curtail the burden of living with advanced COPD.

晚期慢性阻塞性肺病患者及其非正式护理者的需求:一项多视角定性研究,重点关注姑息治疗的潜在作用。
目的:探讨晚期COPD患者和非正式护理人员的需求,并探讨姑息治疗如何满足这些需求。背景:慢性阻塞性肺病是一种影响肺功能的常见进行性疾病,是导致死亡的主要原因之一。晚期慢性阻塞性肺病与高症状负担和生活质量差有关。晚期COPD患者可能受益于姑息治疗,但其在COPD患者中的应用仍然有限,在德国也是如此。方法:对晚期COPD患者、非正式护理人员和正式护理人员(全科医生、肺科医生和姑息治疗医生)进行定性、多视角访谈研究。采用结构化(Kuckartz)和潜在内容分析方法,使用MAXQDA对总共53个访谈进行分析。结果:确定了以下领域的关键需求(1)呼吸困难和焦虑的管理,(2)以家庭为基础的医疗保健,(3)应急计划和支持,(4)社会心理护理,(5)组织支持,以及(6)关于COPD和姑息治疗的及时信息。以前收到个人方案的人报告说,在前五个领域满足了各种需要。结论:晚期COPD患者及其非正式护理人员报告了许多需求。接受姑息治疗的人报告了各种需求的缓解。关于慢性阻塞性肺病进展和姑息治疗的及时信息可以提高这些人对姑息治疗的接受度,从而减少或减少晚期慢性阻塞性肺病患者的生活负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书