Performance status and outcomes in patients with cancer receiving thromboprophylaxis: a subanalysis of the AVERT trial.

IF 3.4 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nicola Potere, Yan Xu, Ranjeeta Mallick, Tzu-Fei Wang, Danny Hill, Alejandro Lazo-Langner, Vicky Tagalakis, Sudeep Shivakumar, Marcello Di Nisio, Philip S Wells, Marc Carrier
{"title":"Performance status and outcomes in patients with cancer receiving thromboprophylaxis: a subanalysis of the AVERT trial.","authors":"Nicola Potere, Yan Xu, Ranjeeta Mallick, Tzu-Fei Wang, Danny Hill, Alejandro Lazo-Langner, Vicky Tagalakis, Sudeep Shivakumar, Marcello Di Nisio, Philip S Wells, Marc Carrier","doi":"10.1186/s40959-026-00542-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) is central to cancer care planning and prognostication. Whether ECOG-PS also carries prognostic value in the setting of primary thromboprophylaxis for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of ECOG-PS on clinical outcomes in ambulatory patients with cancer initiating chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a post-hoc analysis of the AVERT randomized controlled trial that evaluated apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) for thromboprophylaxis in patients at intermediate-to-high VTE risk. Multivariable survival models assessed the association between ECOG-PS (0-1 versus 2-3) and the composite primary outcome of VTE or clinically relevant bleeding (CRB), as well as its individual components and all-cause mortality, over 180 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 428 patients included, 368 (86.0%) and 60 (14.0%) had an ECOG-PS of 0-1 and 2-3, respectively. The primary composite outcome occurred in 12.8% (n = 47) in those with ECOG 0-1 and 18.3% (n = 11) with ECOG-PS 2-3 (6-month cumulative incidence: 13.0% [95% CI: 9.8%-16.7%] versus 19.9% [95% CI: 10.5%-31.4%], respectively). Worse performance status was associated with higher risks for the composite outcome (aHR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.14-2.72; p = 0.011), CRB (aHR: 1.58; 95%CI: 1.53-1.63; p < 0.0001), and all-cause mortality (aHR: 5.77; 95% CI: 4.98-6.67; p < 0.0001). In exploratory treatment-effect analyses, apixaban reduced VTE risk across ECOG-PS strata, including among participants with ECOG-PS 2-3, without clear evidence of excess CRB in this subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECOG-PS predicts VTE-related outcomes in ambulatory patients with cancer and may inform individualized, value-based shared decision-making regarding anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9804,"journal":{"name":"Cardio-oncology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13679223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardio-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-026-00542-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) is central to cancer care planning and prognostication. Whether ECOG-PS also carries prognostic value in the setting of primary thromboprophylaxis for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains unknown.

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of ECOG-PS on clinical outcomes in ambulatory patients with cancer initiating chemotherapy.

Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of the AVERT randomized controlled trial that evaluated apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) for thromboprophylaxis in patients at intermediate-to-high VTE risk. Multivariable survival models assessed the association between ECOG-PS (0-1 versus 2-3) and the composite primary outcome of VTE or clinically relevant bleeding (CRB), as well as its individual components and all-cause mortality, over 180 days.

Results: Of 428 patients included, 368 (86.0%) and 60 (14.0%) had an ECOG-PS of 0-1 and 2-3, respectively. The primary composite outcome occurred in 12.8% (n = 47) in those with ECOG 0-1 and 18.3% (n = 11) with ECOG-PS 2-3 (6-month cumulative incidence: 13.0% [95% CI: 9.8%-16.7%] versus 19.9% [95% CI: 10.5%-31.4%], respectively). Worse performance status was associated with higher risks for the composite outcome (aHR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.14-2.72; p = 0.011), CRB (aHR: 1.58; 95%CI: 1.53-1.63; p < 0.0001), and all-cause mortality (aHR: 5.77; 95% CI: 4.98-6.67; p < 0.0001). In exploratory treatment-effect analyses, apixaban reduced VTE risk across ECOG-PS strata, including among participants with ECOG-PS 2-3, without clear evidence of excess CRB in this subgroup.

Conclusions: ECOG-PS predicts VTE-related outcomes in ambulatory patients with cancer and may inform individualized, value-based shared decision-making regarding anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis.

接受血栓预防的癌症患者的表现状态和结果:AVERT试验的一项亚分析
背景:东部肿瘤合作小组绩效状况(ECOG-PS)是癌症护理计划和预后的核心。ECOG-PS是否在癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的初级血栓预防设置中也具有预后价值尚不清楚。目的:评价ECOG-PS对非住院癌症患者化疗起始期临床预后的影响。方法:这是一项对AVERT随机对照试验的事后分析,该试验评估了阿哌沙班(2.5 mg,每日两次)在中高静脉血栓栓塞风险患者中的血栓预防作用。多变量生存模型评估了ECOG-PS (0-1 vs . 2-3)与静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)或临床相关性出血(CRB)的复合主要结局,以及其个体成分和180天内全因死亡率之间的关系。结果:纳入的428例患者中,ECOG-PS分别为0-1和2-3,分别为368例(86.0%)和60例(14.0%)。ECOG 0-1组的主要综合结局发生率为12.8% (n = 47), ECOG- ps 2-3组为18.3% (n = 11)(6个月累积发生率分别为13.0% [95% CI: 9.8%-16.7%]和19.9% [95% CI: 10.5%-31.4%])。较差的表现状态与复合结局(aHR: 1.76; 95%CI: 1.14-2.72; p = 0.011)和CRB (aHR: 1.58; 95%CI: 1.53-1.63; p)的高风险相关。结论:ECOG-PS预测非住院癌症患者的静脉血栓栓塞相关结局,并可能为个体化、基于价值的抗凝血栓预防共同决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardio-oncology
Cardio-oncology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书