INDICATE [INtroducing DIabetes Checks in A denTal sEtting]: estimating prevalence of undiagnosed pre-diabetes/type 2 diabetes in primary dental care

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Zehra Yonel, Joie Ensor, Thomas Dietrich, Laura J. Gray, Iain L. C. Chapple
{"title":"INDICATE [INtroducing DIabetes Checks in A denTal sEtting]: estimating prevalence of undiagnosed pre-diabetes/type 2 diabetes in primary dental care","authors":"Zehra Yonel, Joie Ensor, Thomas Dietrich, Laura J. Gray, Iain L. C. Chapple","doi":"10.1038/s41415-026-0041-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims Non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH; pre-diabetes) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) represent an increasing health and economic burden. Oral healthcare professionals may support early identification of undiagnosed disease, particularly in patients with periodontitis. This study estimated the prevalence of undiagnosed NDH/T2D in NHS dental settings and evaluated the performance of two validated diabetes risk-prediction tools in primary dental care. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in 13 NHS dental practices. Adults aged ≥40 years without a prior diagnosis of NDH/T2D were recruited. Participants (n = 803) completed two validated risk questionnaires and underwent point-of-care HbA1c testing irrespective of risk score. Individuals with HbA1c ≥42 mmol/mol (6.0%) received preventive advice and were advised to consult their general practitioner. Results Sixty one percent of participants self-identified as women, 85% as white British; and mean body mass index was 27.4 kg/m². NDH prevalence (HbA1c 42–47 mmol/mol) was 10.0%, and previously undiagnosed T2D (≥48 mmol/mol) was 3.0%. Using UK/ADA diagnostic thresholds as the reference standard, both risk tools showed good sensitivity (>80%) but low specificity (<55%). Conclusions This large UK primary care dental study demonstrates that NDH and undiagnosed T2D are common in dental attendees. Both questionnaires showed acceptable sensitivity, while point-of-care HbA1c testing improved specificity within a two-step dental risk-assessment pathway.","PeriodicalId":9229,"journal":{"name":"British Dental Journal","volume":"241 8","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-026-0041-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-026-0041-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims Non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH; pre-diabetes) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) represent an increasing health and economic burden. Oral healthcare professionals may support early identification of undiagnosed disease, particularly in patients with periodontitis. This study estimated the prevalence of undiagnosed NDH/T2D in NHS dental settings and evaluated the performance of two validated diabetes risk-prediction tools in primary dental care. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in 13 NHS dental practices. Adults aged ≥40 years without a prior diagnosis of NDH/T2D were recruited. Participants (n = 803) completed two validated risk questionnaires and underwent point-of-care HbA1c testing irrespective of risk score. Individuals with HbA1c ≥42 mmol/mol (6.0%) received preventive advice and were advised to consult their general practitioner. Results Sixty one percent of participants self-identified as women, 85% as white British; and mean body mass index was 27.4 kg/m². NDH prevalence (HbA1c 42–47 mmol/mol) was 10.0%, and previously undiagnosed T2D (≥48 mmol/mol) was 3.0%. Using UK/ADA diagnostic thresholds as the reference standard, both risk tools showed good sensitivity (>80%) but low specificity (<55%). Conclusions This large UK primary care dental study demonstrates that NDH and undiagnosed T2D are common in dental attendees. Both questionnaires showed acceptable sensitivity, while point-of-care HbA1c testing improved specificity within a two-step dental risk-assessment pathway.
表明[在牙科机构引入糖尿病检查]:估计初级牙科保健中未确诊的糖尿病前期/ 2型糖尿病的患病率。
非糖尿病性高血糖(NDH,糖尿病前期)和2型糖尿病(T2D)是一种日益加重的健康和经济负担。口腔保健专业人员可能支持早期识别未确诊的疾病,特别是牙周炎患者。本研究估计了未确诊的NDH/T2D在NHS牙科机构的患病率,并评估了两种经过验证的糖尿病风险预测工具在初级牙科保健中的表现。方法对13家NHS牙科诊所进行横断面研究。招募年龄≥40岁,既往无NDH/T2D诊断的成年人。无论风险评分如何,参与者(n = 803)完成了两份有效的风险问卷,并接受了即时糖化血红蛋白检测。HbA1c≥42 mmol/mol(6.0%)的患者接受预防性建议,并咨询全科医生。结果61%的参与者自认为是女性,85%是英国白人;平均体重指数为27.4 kg/m²。NDH患病率(HbA1c 42-47 mmol/mol)为10.0%,先前未确诊的T2D患病率(≥48 mmol/mol)为3.0%。以UK/ADA诊断阈值为参考标准,两种风险工具均表现出良好的敏感性(>80%),但特异性较低(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Dental Journal
British Dental Journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
1096
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The role of the BDJ is to inform its readers of ideas, opinions, developments and key issues in dentistry - clinical, practical and scientific - stimulating interest, debate and discussion amongst dentists of all disciplines. All papers published in the BDJ are subject to rigorous peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书