Protocol for a parallel-group superiority randomized controlled trial comparing Sage- a couple psychotherapy- to supportive individual psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Skye Fitzpatrick, Vinushini Arunagiri, Jenna M Traynor, Beverley K Fredborg, Alexander R Daros, Alexander O Crenshaw, Danielle Fitzpatrick, Shelley F McMain, Candice M Monson, Lynn Courey, Rachel E Liebman
{"title":"Protocol for a parallel-group superiority randomized controlled trial comparing Sage- a couple psychotherapy- to supportive individual psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder.","authors":"Skye Fitzpatrick, Vinushini Arunagiri, Jenna M Traynor, Beverley K Fredborg, Alexander R Daros, Alexander O Crenshaw, Danielle Fitzpatrick, Shelley F McMain, Candice M Monson, Lynn Courey, Rachel E Liebman","doi":"10.1186/s12888-026-08374-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although borderline personality disorder (BPD) is associated with substantial mortality and morbidity, frontline BPD interventions are difficult to access and have suboptimal efficacy. Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop and test brief, optimized BPD interventions. BPD is associated with disrupted intimate relationships, and recent theoretical models suggest that such disruptions may play a central role in driving BPD pathology. This led to the development of Sage, a protocolized, conjoint psychotherapeutic intervention delivered to people with BPD and their intimate partners to treat BPD and simultaneously improve relationship conflict and intimate partner's mental health. While preliminary research supports the efficacy of Sage, a key next step is identifying whether Sage is more efficacious compared to standard care in improving its targets. This manuscript outlines the study protocol for a single-blind, parallel two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing Sage to a supportive psychotherapy that is delivered separately to people with BPD and their intimate partners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Couples wherein one member has BPD (target N = 152 couples) are actively being recruited. After eligibility and baseline assessments are complete, couples are randomized to Sage or Supportive Individual Psychotherapy. Weekly supervision meetings are held for both conditions by independent supervisors to ensure intervention adherence and prevent drift. Primary (BPD symptoms), secondary (relationship conflict, partner mental health), and exploratory outcomes (e.g. people with BPD's emotion dysregulation, suicidal ideation, suicidal and self-injurious behaviors, relationship satisfaction) are assessed by masked assessors at baseline, mid-intervention, post-intervention, and at a one-, three, and six-month follow-up. Generalized mixed linear models using an intent-to-treat philosophy will be conducted to examine differences between study outcomes across conditions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results will illuminate whether Sage is an efficacious means of treating BPD and expanding intervention outcomes to include relationship conflict and partner mental health in a short timeframe.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT06458933, registered on June 12, 2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13678913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-026-08374-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although borderline personality disorder (BPD) is associated with substantial mortality and morbidity, frontline BPD interventions are difficult to access and have suboptimal efficacy. Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop and test brief, optimized BPD interventions. BPD is associated with disrupted intimate relationships, and recent theoretical models suggest that such disruptions may play a central role in driving BPD pathology. This led to the development of Sage, a protocolized, conjoint psychotherapeutic intervention delivered to people with BPD and their intimate partners to treat BPD and simultaneously improve relationship conflict and intimate partner's mental health. While preliminary research supports the efficacy of Sage, a key next step is identifying whether Sage is more efficacious compared to standard care in improving its targets. This manuscript outlines the study protocol for a single-blind, parallel two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing Sage to a supportive psychotherapy that is delivered separately to people with BPD and their intimate partners.

Methods: Couples wherein one member has BPD (target N = 152 couples) are actively being recruited. After eligibility and baseline assessments are complete, couples are randomized to Sage or Supportive Individual Psychotherapy. Weekly supervision meetings are held for both conditions by independent supervisors to ensure intervention adherence and prevent drift. Primary (BPD symptoms), secondary (relationship conflict, partner mental health), and exploratory outcomes (e.g. people with BPD's emotion dysregulation, suicidal ideation, suicidal and self-injurious behaviors, relationship satisfaction) are assessed by masked assessors at baseline, mid-intervention, post-intervention, and at a one-, three, and six-month follow-up. Generalized mixed linear models using an intent-to-treat philosophy will be conducted to examine differences between study outcomes across conditions.

Discussion: Results will illuminate whether Sage is an efficacious means of treating BPD and expanding intervention outcomes to include relationship conflict and partner mental health in a short timeframe.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT06458933, registered on June 12, 2024).

一项平行组优势随机对照试验的协议,比较Sage-一种夫妻心理治疗-和支持性个人心理治疗边缘型人格障碍。
背景:尽管边缘型人格障碍(BPD)与大量的死亡率和发病率相关,但BPD的一线干预措施很难获得,而且效果不理想。因此,迫切需要开发和测试简短、优化的BPD干预措施。BPD与破裂的亲密关系有关,最近的理论模型表明,这种破裂可能在驱动BPD病理中起着核心作用。这导致了Sage的发展,这是一种针对BPD患者及其亲密伴侣的协议化联合心理治疗干预,用于治疗BPD,同时改善关系冲突和亲密伴侣的心理健康。虽然初步研究支持Sage的疗效,但关键的下一步是确定Sage在改善其目标方面是否比标准治疗更有效。本文概述了一项单盲、平行、双臂随机对照试验(RCT)的研究方案,该试验将Sage与一种支持性心理治疗进行比较,后者分别对BPD患者及其亲密伴侣进行治疗。方法:积极招募成员中有一人患有BPD的夫妇(目标N = 152对)。在资格和基线评估完成后,夫妇被随机分配到Sage或支持性个人心理治疗组。每周由独立监督员举行监督会议,以确保干预的依从性和防止漂移。初级(BPD症状)、次级(关系冲突、伴侣心理健康)和探索性结果(如BPD情绪失调、自杀意念、自杀和自残行为、关系满意度)由蒙面评估者在基线、干预中期、干预后以及1个月、3个月和6个月随访时进行评估。使用意向治疗哲学的广义混合线性模型将用于检查不同条件下研究结果之间的差异。讨论:结果将阐明Sage是否是治疗BPD的有效手段,并在短时间内将干预结果扩大到包括关系冲突和伴侣心理健康。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT06458933,注册于2024年6月12日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书