Quantifying Facial Rejuvenation after Deep Plane Facelift Using Convolutional Neural Network-Based Age Estimation: Correlation with Patient-Reported Outcomes on the FACE-Q Aesthetic Module.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Soner Karaali, Aytaç Alten, Burak Ergün Tatar
{"title":"Quantifying Facial Rejuvenation after Deep Plane Facelift Using Convolutional Neural Network-Based Age Estimation: Correlation with Patient-Reported Outcomes on the FACE-Q Aesthetic Module.","authors":"Soner Karaali, Aytaç Alten, Burak Ergün Tatar","doi":"10.1007/s00266-026-06374-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To quantify perceived age reduction following deep plane face and neck lift surgery using five publicly available CNN models and evaluate the correlation between AI-estimated rejuvenation and FACE-Q Aesthetic Module outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study of 72 female patients undergoing deep plane face and neck lift surgery between 2020 and 2024 was conducted. Standardized photographs were analyzed using five CNN platforms: FacePlusPlus, Amazon Rekognition, Inferdo Face, howOld AI, and Facelytics. The arithmetic midpoint was used for the range-reporting models. A corrected and standardized age reduction metric was computed for each model and averaged into a composite score. The FACE-Q Aesthetic Module was administered at the 12-month follow-up. Spearman's rank correlation analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The composite standardized age reduction was 7.64 ± 3.44 years (15.67 ± 6.76%). Inter-model differences were not significant (Friedman test: χ<sup>2</sup>(4) = 9.23, p = 0.056). Patient-perceived age reduction correlated strongly with facial appearance (ρ = 0.61, p < 0.001), outcomes (ρ = 0.54), and psychological well-being (ρ = 0.44). AI-estimated rejuvenation showed weaker associations, with only the early life impact reaching significance (ρ = 0.25, p = 0.034).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CNN-based age estimation provides a reproducible and observer-independent metric for quantifying facial rejuvenation. AI-estimated and patient-perceived rejuvenation represent complementary dimensions of surgical outcomes, and their integration enables a more rigorous multidimensional evaluation framework.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence ii: </strong>This journal requires authors to assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions for Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-026-06374-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To quantify perceived age reduction following deep plane face and neck lift surgery using five publicly available CNN models and evaluate the correlation between AI-estimated rejuvenation and FACE-Q Aesthetic Module outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of 72 female patients undergoing deep plane face and neck lift surgery between 2020 and 2024 was conducted. Standardized photographs were analyzed using five CNN platforms: FacePlusPlus, Amazon Rekognition, Inferdo Face, howOld AI, and Facelytics. The arithmetic midpoint was used for the range-reporting models. A corrected and standardized age reduction metric was computed for each model and averaged into a composite score. The FACE-Q Aesthetic Module was administered at the 12-month follow-up. Spearman's rank correlation analysis was performed.

Results: The composite standardized age reduction was 7.64 ± 3.44 years (15.67 ± 6.76%). Inter-model differences were not significant (Friedman test: χ2(4) = 9.23, p = 0.056). Patient-perceived age reduction correlated strongly with facial appearance (ρ = 0.61, p < 0.001), outcomes (ρ = 0.54), and psychological well-being (ρ = 0.44). AI-estimated rejuvenation showed weaker associations, with only the early life impact reaching significance (ρ = 0.25, p = 0.034).

Discussion: CNN-based age estimation provides a reproducible and observer-independent metric for quantifying facial rejuvenation. AI-estimated and patient-perceived rejuvenation represent complementary dimensions of surgical outcomes, and their integration enables a more rigorous multidimensional evaluation framework.

Level of evidence ii: This journal requires authors to assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions for Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

使用基于卷积神经网络的年龄估计量化深度平面整容后的面部年轻化:与FACE-Q美学模块患者报告结果的相关性
简介:使用五个公开的CNN模型量化深度平面面部和颈部提升手术后的感知年龄减少,并评估ai估计的年轻化与face - q美学模块结果之间的相关性。方法:对2020年至2024年间行深度平面面部颈部提升术的72例女性患者进行回顾性横断面研究。标准化照片使用五个CNN平台进行分析:FacePlusPlus、Amazon Rekognition、Inferdo Face、howOld AI和Facelytics。距离报告模型采用算术中点。为每个模型计算一个校正和标准化的年龄减少度量,并将其平均为一个综合分数。在12个月的随访中使用FACE-Q美学模块。进行Spearman秩相关分析。结果:综合标准化年龄减少7.64±3.44岁(15.67±6.76%)。模型间差异无统计学意义(Friedman检验:χ2(4) = 9.23, p = 0.056)。讨论:基于cnn的年龄估计为量化面部年轻化提供了一个可重复的、独立于观察者的度量。人工智能估计和患者感知的恢复代表了手术结果的互补维度,它们的整合使更严格的多维评估框架成为可能。证据等级ii:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书