Latent profiles of Big Five personality traits among Chinese university students and their associations with psychological distress and health-related quality of life: The moderating role of the school sports environment.

IF 3.8 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Jingfeng Wang, Zongyu Liu, Bochuan Zhao, Li Shu
{"title":"Latent profiles of Big Five personality traits among Chinese university students and their associations with psychological distress and health-related quality of life: The moderating role of the school sports environment.","authors":"Jingfeng Wang, Zongyu Liu, Bochuan Zhao, Li Shu","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Variable-centred research overlooks how personality dimensions combine within individuals. This study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify Big Five personality profiles among 2291 Chinese university students, examine profile differences in depression, anxiety, stress, and mental and physical health-related quality of life, and test whether the school sports environment moderated profile differences in health-related quality of life. Participants completed the Big Five Inventory-10 (BFI-10), the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and a 47-item School Sports Environment Questionnaire. A three-profile solution was retained, comprising Average (68.4%), Emotionally Fragile (6.3%; low extraversion, low conscientiousness, high neuroticism), and Resilient (25.3%; high extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness, low neuroticism). The Resilient profile exhibited higher mental and physical health-related quality-of-life scores and lower levels of depression, anxiety, and stress, whereas the Emotionally Fragile profile showed the opposite pattern; all pairwise differences were significant (adjusted p < 0.001). A more supportive school sports environment was associated with higher mental and physical health-related quality-of-life scores across profiles. The Profile × School Sports Environment interaction was significant for both mental health-related quality of life, F(2, 2280) = 7.07, p < 0.001, and physical health-related quality of life, F(2, 2280) = 4.70, p = 0.009. Simple slope analyses indicated significant positive associations in all three profiles, with the strongest associations observed in the Emotionally Fragile profile. These findings extend person-centred evidence on personality and health among Chinese university students and identify profile-dependent associations with the school sports environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"270 ","pages":"107997"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107997","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Variable-centred research overlooks how personality dimensions combine within individuals. This study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify Big Five personality profiles among 2291 Chinese university students, examine profile differences in depression, anxiety, stress, and mental and physical health-related quality of life, and test whether the school sports environment moderated profile differences in health-related quality of life. Participants completed the Big Five Inventory-10 (BFI-10), the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and a 47-item School Sports Environment Questionnaire. A three-profile solution was retained, comprising Average (68.4%), Emotionally Fragile (6.3%; low extraversion, low conscientiousness, high neuroticism), and Resilient (25.3%; high extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness, low neuroticism). The Resilient profile exhibited higher mental and physical health-related quality-of-life scores and lower levels of depression, anxiety, and stress, whereas the Emotionally Fragile profile showed the opposite pattern; all pairwise differences were significant (adjusted p < 0.001). A more supportive school sports environment was associated with higher mental and physical health-related quality-of-life scores across profiles. The Profile × School Sports Environment interaction was significant for both mental health-related quality of life, F(2, 2280) = 7.07, p < 0.001, and physical health-related quality of life, F(2, 2280) = 4.70, p = 0.009. Simple slope analyses indicated significant positive associations in all three profiles, with the strongest associations observed in the Emotionally Fragile profile. These findings extend person-centred evidence on personality and health among Chinese university students and identify profile-dependent associations with the school sports environment.

中国大学生五大人格特质的潜在特征及其与心理困扰和健康相关生活质量的关系:学校体育环境的调节作用
以变量为中心的研究忽略了人格维度是如何在个体内部结合的。本研究采用潜在特征分析(LPA)对2291名中国大学生进行大五人格特征识别,考察抑郁、焦虑、压力和身心健康相关生活质量的特征差异,并检验学校体育环境是否调节健康相关生活质量的特征差异。参与者完成了大五量表-10 (BFI-10)、抑郁焦虑压力量表(DASS-21)、36项简短健康调查(SF-36)和47项学校体育环境问卷。保留了一个三轮廓的解决方案,包括平均(68.4%),情感脆弱(6.3%;低外向性,低尽责性,高神经质)和弹性(25.3%;高外向性,亲和性,尽责性,开放性,低神经质)。弹性档案表现出较高的精神和身体健康相关的生活质量得分和较低的抑郁、焦虑和压力水平,而情感脆弱档案则表现出相反的模式;所有两两差异均显著(校正p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书