A National Trauma Data Bank Analysis of Work-Related Versus Non Work-Related Trauma Injury Admissions in the United States, 2017-2022.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nadia T Saif, Harold Gomes, Audrey A Reichard, Vidisha Parasram, Christina Socias-Morales
{"title":"A National Trauma Data Bank Analysis of Work-Related Versus Non Work-Related Trauma Injury Admissions in the United States, 2017-2022.","authors":"Nadia T Saif, Harold Gomes, Audrey A Reichard, Vidisha Parasram, Christina Socias-Morales","doi":"10.1002/ajim.70148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma registry data have unique characteristics differentiating them from traditional occupational injury surveillance data sources. This study analyzed trauma injury admissions (which includes emergency department encounters regardless of discharge disposition) in the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) to compare worker and injury characteristics of work-related and non-work-related admissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed admissions among patients aged 14 years and older from the NTDB during 2017-2022. We calculated frequencies for demographic, injury, and outcome characteristics stratified by work-relatedness (injury occurrence during paid employment). Multivariable logistic regression assessed the relationship between demographic and injury characteristics with work-relatedness as the outcome, adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and mechanism of injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5,901,246 injuries, 241,328 injuries (4.1%) were work-related. More work-related injuries were in males (87.6% vs. 59.5% of non-work-related) and were unintentional (95.6% vs. 85.1%). The highest proportion of work-related injuries were in the construction industry (29.6%). More work-related admissions required the operating room (19.8% vs. 10.9%). Patients ages 25-44 years and men had higher odds of sustaining work-related injuries compared with other age groups and women. The mechanism of injury with the highest odds of work-relatedness compared to falls (reference) was from machinery (OR<sub>adj</sub> 9.39, 95% CI 8.63-10.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trauma registry data can contribute to occupational injury research and surveillance. Strengths include a large sample size, industry and occupation coding, and data on severity, demographics, injury mechanisms, and outcomes. NTDB data could be used to study occupational injury trends among U.S-workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.70148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trauma registry data have unique characteristics differentiating them from traditional occupational injury surveillance data sources. This study analyzed trauma injury admissions (which includes emergency department encounters regardless of discharge disposition) in the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) to compare worker and injury characteristics of work-related and non-work-related admissions.

Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed admissions among patients aged 14 years and older from the NTDB during 2017-2022. We calculated frequencies for demographic, injury, and outcome characteristics stratified by work-relatedness (injury occurrence during paid employment). Multivariable logistic regression assessed the relationship between demographic and injury characteristics with work-relatedness as the outcome, adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and mechanism of injury.

Results: Of 5,901,246 injuries, 241,328 injuries (4.1%) were work-related. More work-related injuries were in males (87.6% vs. 59.5% of non-work-related) and were unintentional (95.6% vs. 85.1%). The highest proportion of work-related injuries were in the construction industry (29.6%). More work-related admissions required the operating room (19.8% vs. 10.9%). Patients ages 25-44 years and men had higher odds of sustaining work-related injuries compared with other age groups and women. The mechanism of injury with the highest odds of work-relatedness compared to falls (reference) was from machinery (ORadj 9.39, 95% CI 8.63-10.22).

Conclusions: Trauma registry data can contribute to occupational injury research and surveillance. Strengths include a large sample size, industry and occupation coding, and data on severity, demographics, injury mechanisms, and outcomes. NTDB data could be used to study occupational injury trends among U.S-workers.

2017-2022年美国国家创伤数据库中与工作相关与非工作相关的创伤入院分析
背景:创伤登记数据具有独特的特点,区别于传统的职业伤害监测数据源。本研究分析了美国外科医师学会国家创伤数据库(NTDB)中的外伤入院(包括急诊就诊,无论出院情况如何),以比较与工作有关和与工作无关的入院患者的工伤特征。方法:本横断面研究分析了2017-2022年期间NTDB收治的14岁及以上患者。我们计算了人口统计学、伤害和结果特征的频率,这些特征按工作相关性(带薪工作期间的伤害发生)分层。多变量逻辑回归评估了人口统计学和损伤特征之间的关系,以工作相关性为结果,调整了年龄、性别、种族/民族和损伤机制。结果:5901246例伤情中,工伤241328例(4.1%)。与工作有关的伤害更多是男性(87.6%对59.5%的非与工作有关的伤害)和非故意伤害(95.6%对85.1%)。工伤比例最高的是建造业(29.6%)。更多与工作相关的住院需要手术室(19.8%对10.9%)。与其他年龄组和女性相比,25-44岁的男性患者发生工伤的几率更高。与跌倒(参考)相比,与工作相关的伤害机制是由机械造成的(ORadj 9.39, 95% CI 8.63-10.22)。结论:创伤登记数据有助于职业伤害的研究和监测。研究的优势包括样本量大,行业和职业编码,以及严重程度、人口统计、伤害机制和结果的数据。NTDB的数据可以用来研究美国工人的职业伤害趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书