Tillage practices affect the synergetic relationship between soil organic carbon and crop yield under straw return.

IF 9.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Menghan Dong, Jinkang Yang, Yalin Yu, Li Li, Ahmad Latif Virk, Haishui Yang, Feng-Min Li, Zheng-Rong Kan
{"title":"Tillage practices affect the synergetic relationship between soil organic carbon and crop yield under straw return.","authors":"Menghan Dong, Jinkang Yang, Yalin Yu, Li Li, Ahmad Latif Virk, Haishui Yang, Feng-Min Li, Zheng-Rong Kan","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.131193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Straw returning is a pivotal strategy to enhance soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration and crop yield. However, the synergy between these two outcomes and its spatial variability under different tillage practices remain poorly quantified. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis using 1767 paired observations from 222 studies in China, including 726 SOC comparisons and 1041 yield comparisons, with 428 observations contributing to both analyses. Observations with complete baseline soil data were then combined with harmonized gridded spatial predictors to generate scenario-based adaptation maps. Our findings demonstrate that straw return significantly increased SOC concentration by 10.66% and crop yield by 7.96% compared to straw removal, with a significant positive correlation between the two responses. The strength of this synergy, however, was strongly modulated by crop type and tillage practice, and differed between topsoil and subsoil layers. Notably, subsoiling (SS) and no-till (NT) more frequently produced simultaneous benefits for both SOC and yield, whereas conventional tillage (CT) and rotary tillage (RT) showed greater variability. However, these estimates carry uncertainty due to uneven observational coverage for certain crops and the inherent limitations of grid-based environmental data. Our findings suggest that strategic combinations of straw return with appropriate tillage and crop selection can effectively reconcile SOC concentration with productivity goals. We conclude that region-specific adaptation is essential for sustainable agricultural management under straw return.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"419 ","pages":"131193"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.131193","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Straw returning is a pivotal strategy to enhance soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration and crop yield. However, the synergy between these two outcomes and its spatial variability under different tillage practices remain poorly quantified. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis using 1767 paired observations from 222 studies in China, including 726 SOC comparisons and 1041 yield comparisons, with 428 observations contributing to both analyses. Observations with complete baseline soil data were then combined with harmonized gridded spatial predictors to generate scenario-based adaptation maps. Our findings demonstrate that straw return significantly increased SOC concentration by 10.66% and crop yield by 7.96% compared to straw removal, with a significant positive correlation between the two responses. The strength of this synergy, however, was strongly modulated by crop type and tillage practice, and differed between topsoil and subsoil layers. Notably, subsoiling (SS) and no-till (NT) more frequently produced simultaneous benefits for both SOC and yield, whereas conventional tillage (CT) and rotary tillage (RT) showed greater variability. However, these estimates carry uncertainty due to uneven observational coverage for certain crops and the inherent limitations of grid-based environmental data. Our findings suggest that strategic combinations of straw return with appropriate tillage and crop selection can effectively reconcile SOC concentration with productivity goals. We conclude that region-specific adaptation is essential for sustainable agricultural management under straw return.

秸秆还田条件下,耕作方式影响土壤有机碳与作物产量的协同关系。
秸秆还田是提高土壤有机碳(SOC)浓度和作物产量的关键策略。然而,这两种结果之间的协同效应及其在不同耕作方式下的空间变异性仍然缺乏量化。因此,我们对来自中国222项研究的1767个配对观测数据进行了meta分析,其中包括726个有机碳比较和1041个产量比较,其中428个观测数据对两项分析都有贡献。然后,将具有完整基线土壤数据的观测结果与协调网格空间预测因子相结合,生成基于场景的适应图。结果表明,秸秆还田与秸秆还田相比,土壤有机碳浓度显著提高10.66%,作物产量显著提高7.96%,二者呈显著正相关。然而,这种协同作用的强度受到作物类型和耕作方式的强烈调节,并且在表土和底土层之间有所不同。值得注意的是,深耕(SS)和免耕(NT)更频繁地同时产生有机碳和产量的效益,而常规耕作(CT)和旋转耕(RT)表现出更大的变异性。然而,由于某些作物的观测覆盖范围不均匀以及基于网格的环境数据的固有局限性,这些估计具有不确定性。研究结果表明,秸秆还田与适当的耕作方式和作物选择的战略组合可以有效地协调有机碳浓度与生产力目标。我们认为,在秸秆还田条件下,区域适应对可持续农业管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书