Xin Li, Xu Li, Yang Chen, Ziyan Zhou, Weiguang Zeng, Xinchuang Chen, Chunchun An, Jinrong Li, Zhi Dong
{"title":"Optimizing dryland ecological restoration: Unveiling the lagged and nonlinear threshold effects on carbon-water compound use efficiency.","authors":"Xin Li, Xu Li, Yang Chen, Ziyan Zhou, Weiguang Zeng, Xinchuang Chen, Chunchun An, Jinrong Li, Zhi Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.131189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ecological restoration regulates carbon water processes in arid and semi-arid ecosystems, yet its lagged and threshold effects remain unclear. Using multi-source remote sensing data from 2000 to 2022, we identified forest restoration regions, shrubland-grassland restoration regions, and gradual vegetation restoration regions (VRRs) in the Ningxia-Inner Mongolia Reach of the Yellow River and quantified their lagged effects on carbon use efficiency (CUE), water use efficiency (WUE), and carbon-water compound use efficiency (COM) using distributed lag nonlinear models. VRRs dominated restoration, with restoration occurring earlier in the semi-arid area. CUE showed a dominant response at lag 5, whereas WUE and COM showed lagged responses at lag 3-5 in the arid area but immediate responses in the semi-arid area. Restoration thresholds varied by climate. In the arid area, SGRRs and VRRs had a safe restoration range of 23%-48% for annual newly added restoration proportion at the 1-km grid-cell scale, while negative WUE and COM responses emerged when restoration exceeded approximately 60%, associated with lag 3-5 effects. In the semi-arid area, restoration could exceed 60% without adverse effects. FRRs showed a low threshold of 10%-15%, SGRRs an optimal threshold of approximately 52%, and VRRs a higher threshold of 49%-61%. These findings provide a basis for climate-specific ecological restoration that maximizes long-term carbon-water synergies.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"419 ","pages":"131189"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.131189","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ecological restoration regulates carbon water processes in arid and semi-arid ecosystems, yet its lagged and threshold effects remain unclear. Using multi-source remote sensing data from 2000 to 2022, we identified forest restoration regions, shrubland-grassland restoration regions, and gradual vegetation restoration regions (VRRs) in the Ningxia-Inner Mongolia Reach of the Yellow River and quantified their lagged effects on carbon use efficiency (CUE), water use efficiency (WUE), and carbon-water compound use efficiency (COM) using distributed lag nonlinear models. VRRs dominated restoration, with restoration occurring earlier in the semi-arid area. CUE showed a dominant response at lag 5, whereas WUE and COM showed lagged responses at lag 3-5 in the arid area but immediate responses in the semi-arid area. Restoration thresholds varied by climate. In the arid area, SGRRs and VRRs had a safe restoration range of 23%-48% for annual newly added restoration proportion at the 1-km grid-cell scale, while negative WUE and COM responses emerged when restoration exceeded approximately 60%, associated with lag 3-5 effects. In the semi-arid area, restoration could exceed 60% without adverse effects. FRRs showed a low threshold of 10%-15%, SGRRs an optimal threshold of approximately 52%, and VRRs a higher threshold of 49%-61%. These findings provide a basis for climate-specific ecological restoration that maximizes long-term carbon-water synergies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.