Association of Primary Care Physician Density With Metastatic Cancer at Initial Diagnosis: A Population-Based Study of 7 Cancers.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2026-10-01 DOI:10.1002/cam4.72269
Muhammad Sohaib Khan, Tammy Leonard, Bella Etingen, Saad Mallick, Natalie Williams, Herbert J Zeh, Patricio M Polanco
{"title":"Association of Primary Care Physician Density With Metastatic Cancer at Initial Diagnosis: A Population-Based Study of 7 Cancers.","authors":"Muhammad Sohaib Khan, Tammy Leonard, Bella Etingen, Saad Mallick, Natalie Williams, Herbert J Zeh, Patricio M Polanco","doi":"10.1002/cam4.72269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with metastatic cancer at initial diagnosis have the worst prognosis. Despite their involvement in initial assessment, the relationship between Primary Care Physician availability and metastatic cancer at initial diagnosis remains unexplored. Our objective was to determine whether Primary Care Physician availability is associated with patients having metastatic cancer at initial diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of patients aged ≥ 18 and diagnosed with breast, colorectal, liver, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, or prostate cancer from 2015 to 2019. Population-based Texas and California cancer registries were used for patient data. The main exposure was county-level Primary Care Physician density per 3500 individuals. Additional exposures included demographic factors, insurance, rural-urban continuum codes, county poverty rates, and US State at Diagnosis. The primary outcome was adjusted odds of metastatic cancer at initial diagnosis. Subgroup analyses based on insurance type, age group, and metropolitan residence were performed. Models were stratified by cancer type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 708,451 patients were included. On combined multivariable analysis, with each additional Primary Care Physician per 3500 individuals, the odds for primary outcome decreased by 2% to 6%. In a stratified analysis using Primary Care Physician density per 3500 individuals as a categorical variable, compared with counties with < 1 Primary Care Physician, counties with 3 or more Primary Care Physicians had reduced odds of primary outcome for multiple cancer types with no statistically significant difference for counties with 1-1.9 Primary Care Physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased Primary Care Physician availability was associated with a nonlinear decrease in odds for metastatic cancer at diagnosis. Thus, increasing physician density can possibly lower the likelihood of metastatic cancer at initial diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"15 10","pages":"e72269"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13680540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.72269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with metastatic cancer at initial diagnosis have the worst prognosis. Despite their involvement in initial assessment, the relationship between Primary Care Physician availability and metastatic cancer at initial diagnosis remains unexplored. Our objective was to determine whether Primary Care Physician availability is associated with patients having metastatic cancer at initial diagnosis.

Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study of patients aged ≥ 18 and diagnosed with breast, colorectal, liver, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, or prostate cancer from 2015 to 2019. Population-based Texas and California cancer registries were used for patient data. The main exposure was county-level Primary Care Physician density per 3500 individuals. Additional exposures included demographic factors, insurance, rural-urban continuum codes, county poverty rates, and US State at Diagnosis. The primary outcome was adjusted odds of metastatic cancer at initial diagnosis. Subgroup analyses based on insurance type, age group, and metropolitan residence were performed. Models were stratified by cancer type.

Results: Overall, 708,451 patients were included. On combined multivariable analysis, with each additional Primary Care Physician per 3500 individuals, the odds for primary outcome decreased by 2% to 6%. In a stratified analysis using Primary Care Physician density per 3500 individuals as a categorical variable, compared with counties with < 1 Primary Care Physician, counties with 3 or more Primary Care Physicians had reduced odds of primary outcome for multiple cancer types with no statistically significant difference for counties with 1-1.9 Primary Care Physicians.

Conclusion: Increased Primary Care Physician availability was associated with a nonlinear decrease in odds for metastatic cancer at diagnosis. Thus, increasing physician density can possibly lower the likelihood of metastatic cancer at initial diagnosis.

初级保健医生密度与初诊断转移性癌症的关系:一项基于人群的7种癌症研究
背景:初诊转移性癌患者预后最差。尽管他们参与了初步评估,初级保健医生的可用性和转移性癌症的初步诊断之间的关系仍未被探索。我们的目的是确定初级保健医生的可用性是否与患者在初始诊断时患有转移性癌症有关。方法:这是一项横断面研究,研究对象为2015年至2019年年龄≥18岁,诊断为乳腺癌、结肠直肠癌、肝癌、肺癌、卵巢癌、胰腺癌或前列腺癌的患者。以人群为基础的德克萨斯州和加利福尼亚州癌症登记处用于患者数据。主要暴露是每3500人的县级初级保健医生密度。其他暴露因素包括人口因素、保险、城乡连续代码、县贫困率和美国诊断状态。主要结果是初始诊断时转移癌的调整几率。根据保险类型、年龄组别和大都市居住地进行亚组分析。模型按癌型分层。结果:共纳入708,451例患者。在综合多变量分析中,每3500人中每增加一名初级保健医生,主要结局的几率下降了2%至6%。在一项以每3500人的初级保健医生密度作为分类变量的分层分析中,与郡县进行了比较,得出结论:初级保健医生可用性的增加与诊断时转移性癌症的几率非线性降低相关。因此,增加医师密度可能会降低最初诊断时转移癌的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书