Functionalized bioresorbable biliary stents: materials design, coating engineering, and clinical translation.

IF 6.1 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
RSC Advances Pub Date : 2026-10-19 DOI:10.1039/d6ra06308j
Bowen Wang, Wei Gong
{"title":"Functionalized bioresorbable biliary stents: materials design, coating engineering, and clinical translation.","authors":"Bowen Wang, Wei Gong","doi":"10.1039/d6ra06308j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biliary strictures remain a major therapeutic challenge because conventional plastic and self-expandable metal stents are limited by occlusion, repeat intervention, migration, and tumor ingrowth. Bioresorbable biliary stents offer temporary mechanical scaffolding and, when functionalized, can also provide local therapeutic delivery without permanent foreign-body retention. This review focuses on the engineering decisions that determine whether these devices can move beyond descriptive promise toward indication-specific translation. We compare polymeric and emerging metallic biodegradable platforms, distinguish <i>in vitro</i>, preclinical <i>in vivo</i>, and expected real-bile degradation behavior, and critically evaluate the trade-offs among radial force retention, flexibility, fatigue resistance, radiopacity, drug release, biofilm resistance, manufacturability, and clinical readiness. Current evidence suggests that polydioxanone (PDO)- and copolymer-based designs may be more suitable for benign or post-surgical indications requiring temporary support, whereas malignant obstruction may require longer patency, stronger radial force, and carefully controlled antiproliferative or chemotherapeutic release. However, available human data include selected cohorts and registries but remain limited in comparative strength, so claims regarding long-term efficacy, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness should remain cautious until larger comparative trials are available.</p>","PeriodicalId":102,"journal":{"name":"RSC Advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13678689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC Advances","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d6ra06308j","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biliary strictures remain a major therapeutic challenge because conventional plastic and self-expandable metal stents are limited by occlusion, repeat intervention, migration, and tumor ingrowth. Bioresorbable biliary stents offer temporary mechanical scaffolding and, when functionalized, can also provide local therapeutic delivery without permanent foreign-body retention. This review focuses on the engineering decisions that determine whether these devices can move beyond descriptive promise toward indication-specific translation. We compare polymeric and emerging metallic biodegradable platforms, distinguish in vitro, preclinical in vivo, and expected real-bile degradation behavior, and critically evaluate the trade-offs among radial force retention, flexibility, fatigue resistance, radiopacity, drug release, biofilm resistance, manufacturability, and clinical readiness. Current evidence suggests that polydioxanone (PDO)- and copolymer-based designs may be more suitable for benign or post-surgical indications requiring temporary support, whereas malignant obstruction may require longer patency, stronger radial force, and carefully controlled antiproliferative or chemotherapeutic release. However, available human data include selected cohorts and registries but remain limited in comparative strength, so claims regarding long-term efficacy, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness should remain cautious until larger comparative trials are available.

功能化生物可吸收胆道支架:材料设计、涂层工程及临床翻译。
胆道狭窄仍然是主要的治疗挑战,因为传统的塑料和自膨胀金属支架受到阻塞、重复干预、迁移和肿瘤向内生长的限制。生物可吸收胆道支架提供临时的机械支架,当功能化时,还可以提供局部治疗递送,而不会产生永久性的异物滞留。这篇综述的重点是工程决策,这些决策决定了这些设备是否能够超越描述性的承诺,走向特定指示的翻译。我们比较了聚合物和新兴的金属可生物降解平台,区分了体外、临床前体内和预期的实际降解行为,并批判性地评估了径向力保留、柔韧性、抗疲劳性、不透光性、药物释放、生物膜抗性、可制造性和临床准备性之间的权衡。目前的证据表明,聚二氧环酮(PDO)和共聚物为基础的设计可能更适合良性或术后需要临时支持的适应症,而恶性阻塞可能需要更长的通畅时间,更强的径向力,并仔细控制抗增殖或化疗释放。然而,现有的人类数据包括选定的队列和登记,但相对强度仍然有限,因此,在获得更大规模的比较试验之前,有关长期疗效、生活质量和成本效益的声明应保持谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RSC Advances
RSC Advances chemical sciences-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
3116
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal covering all of the chemical sciences, including multidisciplinary and emerging areas. RSC Advances is a gold open access journal allowing researchers free access to research articles, and offering an affordable open access publishing option for authors around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书