Yurou Celine Xiao, Siyu Sonia Sun, Rui Kai Miao, Kai Han, Paul-Emmanuel Just, Paul J. Corbett, David Sinton
{"title":"Industrializing reactive capture of CO2","authors":"Yurou Celine Xiao, Siyu Sonia Sun, Rui Kai Miao, Kai Han, Paul-Emmanuel Just, Paul J. Corbett, David Sinton","doi":"10.1038/s41560-026-02113-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electrified CO2 capture and conversion technologies support the energy transition by producing low-carbon chemicals and fuels, but near-term deployment depends on integration with current energy infrastructure. Reactive capture of CO2 (RCC) feeds CO2-rich liquids directly into an electrolyser, bypassing thermal regeneration and simplifying process integration. RCC has a greater tolerance to industrial impurities and can generate high-purity gaseous outputs, enabling a fully electrified chemical synthesis process that is suited to industrial CO2 feedstocks, but current RCC electrolysers are less developed than their gas-fed counterparts. In this Perspective we argue that RCC could become viable for early industrial adoption—ahead of other electrified routes and at present levels of selectivity and voltage—if stability and scale barriers are addressed. Progress will depend on engineering solvent-tolerant cathodes, formulating electrolysis-compatible capture fluids and advancing bipolar membrane efficiency, scalability and durability. We evaluate the performance targets necessary for RCC to become cost-competitive with alternative conversion technologies. Reactive capture of CO2 integrates capture and conversion, bypassing regeneration and potentially simplifying upstream–downstream process integration, but its deployment readiness is unclear. In this Perspective the authors argue that reactive capture of CO2 could be industrially viable at present levels of selectivity and voltage if stability and scale barriers are addressed.","PeriodicalId":19073,"journal":{"name":"Nature Energy","volume":"11 10","pages":"1402-1411"},"PeriodicalIF":70.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Energy","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-026-02113-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Electrified CO2 capture and conversion technologies support the energy transition by producing low-carbon chemicals and fuels, but near-term deployment depends on integration with current energy infrastructure. Reactive capture of CO2 (RCC) feeds CO2-rich liquids directly into an electrolyser, bypassing thermal regeneration and simplifying process integration. RCC has a greater tolerance to industrial impurities and can generate high-purity gaseous outputs, enabling a fully electrified chemical synthesis process that is suited to industrial CO2 feedstocks, but current RCC electrolysers are less developed than their gas-fed counterparts. In this Perspective we argue that RCC could become viable for early industrial adoption—ahead of other electrified routes and at present levels of selectivity and voltage—if stability and scale barriers are addressed. Progress will depend on engineering solvent-tolerant cathodes, formulating electrolysis-compatible capture fluids and advancing bipolar membrane efficiency, scalability and durability. We evaluate the performance targets necessary for RCC to become cost-competitive with alternative conversion technologies. Reactive capture of CO2 integrates capture and conversion, bypassing regeneration and potentially simplifying upstream–downstream process integration, but its deployment readiness is unclear. In this Perspective the authors argue that reactive capture of CO2 could be industrially viable at present levels of selectivity and voltage if stability and scale barriers are addressed.
Nature EnergyEnergy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
75.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
193
期刊介绍:
Nature Energy is a monthly, online-only journal committed to showcasing the most impactful research on energy, covering everything from its generation and distribution to the societal implications of energy technologies and policies.
With a focus on exploring all facets of the ongoing energy discourse, Nature Energy delves into topics such as energy generation, storage, distribution, management, and the societal impacts of energy technologies and policies. Emphasizing studies that push the boundaries of knowledge and contribute to the development of next-generation solutions, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of ideas among stakeholders at the forefront of the energy sector.
Maintaining the hallmark standards of the Nature brand, Nature Energy boasts a dedicated team of professional editors, a rigorous peer-review process, meticulous copy-editing and production, rapid publication times, and editorial independence.
In addition to original research articles, Nature Energy also publishes a range of content types, including Comments, Perspectives, Reviews, News & Views, Features, and Correspondence, covering a diverse array of disciplines relevant to the field of energy.