Optimal Sheath for Single-Access Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Impella CP Hemodynamic Support

Ravi Thakker MD, Adnan Khalif MD, Ying Xu, Seth Bilazarian MD, Dana Bentley BA, J. Dawn Abbott MD, Mario Iannaccone MD, Jason Wollmuth MD, William O’Neill MD, Alexander G. Truesdell MD, Hady Lichaa MD, Mir Babar Basir DO
{"title":"Optimal Sheath for Single-Access Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Impella CP Hemodynamic Support","authors":"Ravi Thakker MD,&nbsp;Adnan Khalif MD,&nbsp;Ying Xu,&nbsp;Seth Bilazarian MD,&nbsp;Dana Bentley BA,&nbsp;J. Dawn Abbott MD,&nbsp;Mario Iannaccone MD,&nbsp;Jason Wollmuth MD,&nbsp;William O’Neill MD,&nbsp;Alexander G. Truesdell MD,&nbsp;Hady Lichaa MD,&nbsp;Mir Babar Basir DO","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2026.105519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Single-access percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the Impella CP (Abiomed) has increased in prevalence. Despite this, the optimal PCI sheath remains unknown. We characterized the optimal 7F PCI sheath using the single-access technique.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The outer diameter measurement of the sheaths was performed using a Keyence 2-axis laser micrometer (Keyence). The force needed to insert the sheath and the torqueability of the guide catheter were assessed using the Mark-10 M5i Advanced Digital Force/Torque Indicator (Mark-10 Corporation) on a simulated single-access setting in a simulated skin pad. The sample size was determined to be 5 sheaths for each test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The BRITE TIP 11 cm (Cordis), BRITE TIP 35 cm (Cordis), and Destination sheath (Terumo) had the largest outer diameters; the Prelude IDeal (Merit Medical) and Terumo Glidesheath (Terumo) had the smallest outer diameters. The Glidesheath was easiest for insertion/removal, followed by the Prelude IDeal and Impella Low Profile (LP) Companion sheath (Abiomed). The Impella LP Companion, Prelude Roadster (Merit Medical), and Destination sheaths allowed for the best torqueability and lowest force to remove the guide catheter. The longer Impella LP Companion sheath did not impact torqueability, but the removal force increased by 50% compared with the shorter Impella LP Companion sheath.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Impella LP Companion sheath demonstrated the best torqueability and least effort in advancing the guide catheters, while the Prelude Roadster and Destination also performed well on these metrics. The Prelude IDeal and Glidesheath were good options for single-access because of their smaller outer diameters and hydrophilic coating and were easiest for insertion/removal through the 14F LP sheath.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"5 10","pages":"Article 105519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930326012664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Single-access percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the Impella CP (Abiomed) has increased in prevalence. Despite this, the optimal PCI sheath remains unknown. We characterized the optimal 7F PCI sheath using the single-access technique.

Methods

The outer diameter measurement of the sheaths was performed using a Keyence 2-axis laser micrometer (Keyence). The force needed to insert the sheath and the torqueability of the guide catheter were assessed using the Mark-10 M5i Advanced Digital Force/Torque Indicator (Mark-10 Corporation) on a simulated single-access setting in a simulated skin pad. The sample size was determined to be 5 sheaths for each test.

Results

The BRITE TIP 11 cm (Cordis), BRITE TIP 35 cm (Cordis), and Destination sheath (Terumo) had the largest outer diameters; the Prelude IDeal (Merit Medical) and Terumo Glidesheath (Terumo) had the smallest outer diameters. The Glidesheath was easiest for insertion/removal, followed by the Prelude IDeal and Impella Low Profile (LP) Companion sheath (Abiomed). The Impella LP Companion, Prelude Roadster (Merit Medical), and Destination sheaths allowed for the best torqueability and lowest force to remove the guide catheter. The longer Impella LP Companion sheath did not impact torqueability, but the removal force increased by 50% compared with the shorter Impella LP Companion sheath.

Conclusion

The Impella LP Companion sheath demonstrated the best torqueability and least effort in advancing the guide catheters, while the Prelude Roadster and Destination also performed well on these metrics. The Prelude IDeal and Glidesheath were good options for single-access because of their smaller outer diameters and hydrophilic coating and were easiest for insertion/removal through the 14F LP sheath.
最佳鞘单通道经皮冠状动脉介入与Impella CP血流动力学支持
背景:使用Impella CP (Abiomed)的单通道经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患病率有所增加。尽管如此,最佳的PCI鞘仍是未知的。我们使用单通道技术对最佳7F PCI护套进行了表征。方法采用Keyence 2轴激光测微仪(Keyence)测量鞘层外径。在模拟皮肤垫的模拟单通道设置上,使用Mark-10 M5i高级数字力/扭矩指示器(Mark-10 Corporation)评估插入护套所需的力和引导导管的扭矩。每次试验的样本量确定为5个护套。结果BRITE TIP 11 cm (Cordis)、BRITE TIP 35 cm (Cordis)和Destination鞘(Terumo)外径最大;Prelude IDeal (Merit Medical)和Terumo Glidesheath (Terumo)的外径最小。Glidesheath是最容易插入/移除的,其次是Prelude IDeal和Impella Low Profile (LP) Companion (Abiomed)。Impella LP Companion、Prelude Roadster (Merit Medical)和Destination护套提供了最佳的扭矩和最低的力来移除导尿管。较长的Impella LP Companion护套不影响扭矩,但与较短的Impella LP Companion护套相比,移除力增加了50%。结论:Impella LP Companion护套在推进导尿管时表现出最佳的扭矩和最少的努力,而Prelude Roadster和Destination在这些指标上也表现良好。由于Prelude IDeal和Glidesheath具有较小的外径和亲水涂层,并且通过14F LP护套的插入/移除非常容易,因此它们是单通道的理想选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书