Evaluating Underground CO2 Storage Potential across Sedimentary Facies of the Michigan Basin

IF 5.2 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ACS Omega Pub Date : 2026-10-20 Epub Date: 2026-10-05 DOI:10.1021/acsomega.6c08038
Nimarta Kaur, Christina Miller, Pablo Sanchez, Emyline Kirda, Alberto Gutiérrez-Vegad, Santiago Aparicio, Ashley Scott, Autumn Haagsma, Ahmad Al-Bodour, Mert Atilhan
{"title":"Evaluating Underground CO2 Storage Potential across Sedimentary Facies of the Michigan Basin","authors":"Nimarta Kaur,&nbsp;Christina Miller,&nbsp;Pablo Sanchez,&nbsp;Emyline Kirda,&nbsp;Alberto Gutiérrez-Vegad,&nbsp;Santiago Aparicio,&nbsp;Ashley Scott,&nbsp;Autumn Haagsma,&nbsp;Ahmad Al-Bodour,&nbsp;Mert Atilhan","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.6c08038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rising atmospheric\r\nCO<sub>2</sub> concentrations demand scalable\r\nand geologically reliable carbon capture and storage solutions. The\r\nMichigan Basin, with its well-characterized Paleozoic sedimentary\r\nsequences and proximity to major industrial emission sources, represents\r\na promising target for underground CO<sub>2</sub> storage. This study\r\nsystematically evaluates the CO<sub>2</sub> storage potential of nine\r\ndistinct sedimentary rock facies retrieved from the Consumers Brine\r\nDisposal 139 (BD-139) well, providing a facies-resolved framework\r\nfor assessing subsurface sequestration capacity. High-pressure isochoric\r\nCO<sub>2</sub> adsorption experiments were conducted across three\r\ntemperature isotherms (25 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C) and\r\nsix pressure points (10–35 bar), complemented by comprehensive\r\nmaterial characterization, including Brunauer–Emmett–Teller\r\n(BET) surface area analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy\r\n(FTIR), scanning electron microscopy equipped with energy-dispersive\r\nspectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Based\r\non their inferred mineralogical composition and thermal behavior,\r\nthe nine facies were classified into three distinct groups: silicate-rich\r\norganic-bearing rocks (Group 1), siliciclastic assemblages with a\r\nsubordinate carbonate component (Group 2), and carbonate-bearing dolomitic\r\nfacies (Group 3). Facies 3 exhibited the highest apparent CO<sub>2</sub> uptake, 855.7 mg/g at 35 bar and 25 °C, and all facies gave\r\nheats of sorption below 60 kJ/mol, consistent with predominantly physical\r\ninteractions and with favorable reversibility for storage cycling.\r\nBecause the measurements were performed on pulverized material, and\r\nbecause the apparent uptake of the highest-performing facies exceeds\r\nthe volumetric capacity of its own pore system, these quantities are\r\nreported and interpreted throughout as apparent isochoric uptake determined\r\nunder identical conditions. They provide a quantitative relative ranking\r\nof the facies rather than absolute in situ storage capacities, and\r\nthe bounds governing their interpretation are set out in Section 3.5.3.\r\nComplementary CO<sub>2</sub> absorption experiments in synthetic brine\r\nsolutions yielded a solid precipitate on depressurization, indicating\r\na potential mineral trapping pathway under high-pressure conditions.\r\nThe findings establish a direct link between facies-level geological\r\nheterogeneity and CO<sub>2</sub> storage performance, offering a practical\r\nscreening framework for site selection and reservoir evaluation within\r\nthe Michigan Basin and analogous sedimentary systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"11 41","pages":"63827–63844"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.6c08038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations demand scalable and geologically reliable carbon capture and storage solutions. The Michigan Basin, with its well-characterized Paleozoic sedimentary sequences and proximity to major industrial emission sources, represents a promising target for underground CO2 storage. This study systematically evaluates the CO2 storage potential of nine distinct sedimentary rock facies retrieved from the Consumers Brine Disposal 139 (BD-139) well, providing a facies-resolved framework for assessing subsurface sequestration capacity. High-pressure isochoric CO2 adsorption experiments were conducted across three temperature isotherms (25 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C) and six pressure points (10–35 bar), complemented by comprehensive material characterization, including Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy equipped with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Based on their inferred mineralogical composition and thermal behavior, the nine facies were classified into three distinct groups: silicate-rich organic-bearing rocks (Group 1), siliciclastic assemblages with a subordinate carbonate component (Group 2), and carbonate-bearing dolomitic facies (Group 3). Facies 3 exhibited the highest apparent CO2 uptake, 855.7 mg/g at 35 bar and 25 °C, and all facies gave heats of sorption below 60 kJ/mol, consistent with predominantly physical interactions and with favorable reversibility for storage cycling. Because the measurements were performed on pulverized material, and because the apparent uptake of the highest-performing facies exceeds the volumetric capacity of its own pore system, these quantities are reported and interpreted throughout as apparent isochoric uptake determined under identical conditions. They provide a quantitative relative ranking of the facies rather than absolute in situ storage capacities, and the bounds governing their interpretation are set out in Section 3.5.3. Complementary CO2 absorption experiments in synthetic brine solutions yielded a solid precipitate on depressurization, indicating a potential mineral trapping pathway under high-pressure conditions. The findings establish a direct link between facies-level geological heterogeneity and CO2 storage performance, offering a practical screening framework for site selection and reservoir evaluation within the Michigan Basin and analogous sedimentary systems.

密歇根盆地沉积相地下CO2储存潜力评价
不断上升的大气二氧化碳浓度需要可扩展且地质可靠的碳捕获和储存解决方案。密歇根盆地具有良好的古生代沉积序列特征,靠近主要的工业排放源,是一个有希望的地下二氧化碳储存目标。本研究系统地评估了从consumer BrineDisposal 139 (BD-139)井中提取的9种不同沉积岩相的二氧化碳储存潜力,为评估地下封存能力提供了一个分相的框架。高压等氯co2吸附实验在3个温度等温线(25°C、35°C和45°C)和6个压力点(10-35 bar)上进行,并辅以全面的材料表征,包括布鲁诺尔-埃米特-泰勒(BET)表面积分析、傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)、配备能量色散光谱(SEM-EDS)的扫描电子显微镜和热重分析(TGA)。根据其推断的矿物组成和热行为,将9个相划分为3组:富硅酸盐-含有机质岩(组1)、含次碳酸盐岩组分的硅屑组合(组2)和含碳酸盐岩白云岩相(组3)。相3表现出最高的表观CO2吸收量,在35 bar和25°C条件下达到855.7 mg/g,并且所有相的吸附热均低于60 kJ/mol,这与主要的物理相互作用一致,并且具有良好的储存循环可逆性。由于测量是在粉状材料上进行的,并且由于表现最好的相的表观吸收量超过了其自身孔隙系统的体积容量,因此这些数量在相同条件下被报道和解释为表观等时吸收量。它们提供了相的定量相对排序,而不是绝对的原位存储容量,其解释的界限在第3.5.3节中列出。在合成盐水溶液中进行的互补CO2吸收实验在减压条件下产生了固体沉淀,表明高压条件下可能存在捕获矿物的途径。研究结果建立了相级地质非均质性与CO2储存性能之间的直接联系,为密歇根盆地和类似沉积体系的选址和储层评估提供了实用的筛选框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Omega
ACS Omega Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书