Reconstructing phreatic palaeogroundwater levels: A methodological review

IF 11.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Laxmi Chaulagain, Jasper Candel, W. Marijn van der Meij, Zoe Kleijwegt, Jakob Wallinga, Roy van Beek, Annegret Larsen
{"title":"Reconstructing phreatic palaeogroundwater levels: A methodological review","authors":"Laxmi Chaulagain, Jasper Candel, W. Marijn van der Meij, Zoe Kleijwegt, Jakob Wallinga, Roy van Beek, Annegret Larsen","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2026.105712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nature-based water management requires a clear understanding of baseline hydrological regimes. Reconstruction of Palaeogroundwater Level (PGWL) is emerging as an approach to determine past groundwater level as a mean to estimate ‘baseline’ or ‘pre-management’ conditions, thereby providing essential benchmarks to guide such interventions. However, methods for PGWL reconstruction remain fragmented across disciplines. This review synthesizes existing approaches of PGWL reconstruction across multiple disciplines, with a specific focus on phreatic groundwater systems, where water-table depth can be inferred from near-surface environmental archives and related proxies. Such aquifers are among the most vulnerable to depletion under global change. We present a range of reconstruction approaches grouped into three major categories: 1) Historical records provide direct evidence of hydrological condition from documented and measured sources; 2) Proxy methods rely on a combination of natural and anthropogenic geo-archives, including biological indicators, soils, sediment profiles, archaeological features, and geomorphological landforms; and 3) Model-based estimations use mathematical relationships to hindcast PGWLs. For each approach, we synthesize its theoretical foundations, evaluate its practical applicability and limitations, analyse its respective spatiotemporal scales, and illustrate its implementation with representative examples. By unifying scattered knowledge, we establish a critical guide for selecting appropriate reconstruction approaches tailored to specific contexts and objectives. We further propose an integration framework in which historical archives are used as evaluation and calibration datasets to strengthen proxy- and model-based reconstructions. This synthesis ultimately supports more resilient and nature-based water management strategies by providing robust methods for determining baseline conditions in unconfined groundwater systems.","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":"88 1","pages":"105712"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2026.105712","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature-based water management requires a clear understanding of baseline hydrological regimes. Reconstruction of Palaeogroundwater Level (PGWL) is emerging as an approach to determine past groundwater level as a mean to estimate ‘baseline’ or ‘pre-management’ conditions, thereby providing essential benchmarks to guide such interventions. However, methods for PGWL reconstruction remain fragmented across disciplines. This review synthesizes existing approaches of PGWL reconstruction across multiple disciplines, with a specific focus on phreatic groundwater systems, where water-table depth can be inferred from near-surface environmental archives and related proxies. Such aquifers are among the most vulnerable to depletion under global change. We present a range of reconstruction approaches grouped into three major categories: 1) Historical records provide direct evidence of hydrological condition from documented and measured sources; 2) Proxy methods rely on a combination of natural and anthropogenic geo-archives, including biological indicators, soils, sediment profiles, archaeological features, and geomorphological landforms; and 3) Model-based estimations use mathematical relationships to hindcast PGWLs. For each approach, we synthesize its theoretical foundations, evaluate its practical applicability and limitations, analyse its respective spatiotemporal scales, and illustrate its implementation with representative examples. By unifying scattered knowledge, we establish a critical guide for selecting appropriate reconstruction approaches tailored to specific contexts and objectives. We further propose an integration framework in which historical archives are used as evaluation and calibration datasets to strengthen proxy- and model-based reconstructions. This synthesis ultimately supports more resilient and nature-based water management strategies by providing robust methods for determining baseline conditions in unconfined groundwater systems.
重建潜水古地下水位:方法综述
基于自然的水管理需要对基线水文制度有清晰的了解。古地下水位重建(PGWL)正在成为一种确定过去地下水位的方法,作为估计“基线”或“管理前”条件的手段,从而为指导此类干预提供必要的基准。然而,PGWL的重建方法在各个学科之间仍然是碎片化的。本文综合了现有的多学科PGWL重建方法,特别关注了潜水地下水系统,其中地下水位深度可以从近地表环境档案和相关代用物中推断出来。在全球变化的影响下,这些含水层是最容易枯竭的。我们提出了一系列重建方法,分为三大类:1)历史记录从文献和测量来源提供水文状况的直接证据;2)代理方法依赖于自然和人为地质档案的结合,包括生物指标、土壤、沉积物剖面、考古特征和地貌地貌;3)基于模型的估计利用数学关系来预测pgwl。对于每一种方法,我们综合了其理论基础,评估了其实际适用性和局限性,分析了其各自的时空尺度,并举例说明了其实现。通过统一分散的知识,我们为选择适合特定背景和目标的适当重建方法建立了关键指南。我们进一步提出了一个将历史档案作为评估和校准数据集的集成框架,以加强基于代理和模型的重建。通过提供确定无承压地下水系统基线条件的可靠方法,这种综合最终支持更具弹性和基于自然的水管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书