Yingxian Qian,Yashuo Zhang,Hui Peng,Qun Luo,Huijuan You
{"title":"Characterizing the unfolding activation barrier of c-MYC G-quadruplex by temperature-dependent single-molecule force spectroscopy","authors":"Yingxian Qian,Yashuo Zhang,Hui Peng,Qun Luo,Huijuan You","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2026.10.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parallel-stranded G-quadruplexes (G4s) exhibit remarkable kinetic stability. However, it remains elusive whether this kinetic stability arises from an intrinsically high activation energy Ea or a constrained transition pathway. Here, we integrated an objective-based heating system with single-molecule magnetic tweezers to quantify the unfolding dynamics of c-MYC promoter G4s (MYC2345) from 16°C to 51°C. As the temperature increased, the peak unfolding force decreased from 58 ± 4 pN to 40 ± 4 pN, while the unfolding rate ku increased from (4.6 ± 0.1) × 10-8 s-1 to (1.4 ± 0.1) × 10-5 s-1. Arrhenius analysis yielded a moderate unfolding activation energy of 137 ± 19 kJ·mol-1 (∼55 kBT). Notably, this Arrhenius slope is markedly shallower than that of duplex DNA, demonstrating that G4 unfolding is less sensitive to thermal fluctuation than duplex melting. The kinetic stability of the c-MYC G4 is mainly due to the small transition distance rather than a high enthalpic barrier. Furthermore, the folding rate kf of G4 exhibits low temperature sensitivity, increasing 1.5-fold between 23°C and 37°C, suggesting that the folding kinetics are dominated by the entropic barrier. Our results provide a direct quantitative measurement of G4 energy landscapes.","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2026.10.015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Parallel-stranded G-quadruplexes (G4s) exhibit remarkable kinetic stability. However, it remains elusive whether this kinetic stability arises from an intrinsically high activation energy Ea or a constrained transition pathway. Here, we integrated an objective-based heating system with single-molecule magnetic tweezers to quantify the unfolding dynamics of c-MYC promoter G4s (MYC2345) from 16°C to 51°C. As the temperature increased, the peak unfolding force decreased from 58 ± 4 pN to 40 ± 4 pN, while the unfolding rate ku increased from (4.6 ± 0.1) × 10-8 s-1 to (1.4 ± 0.1) × 10-5 s-1. Arrhenius analysis yielded a moderate unfolding activation energy of 137 ± 19 kJ·mol-1 (∼55 kBT). Notably, this Arrhenius slope is markedly shallower than that of duplex DNA, demonstrating that G4 unfolding is less sensitive to thermal fluctuation than duplex melting. The kinetic stability of the c-MYC G4 is mainly due to the small transition distance rather than a high enthalpic barrier. Furthermore, the folding rate kf of G4 exhibits low temperature sensitivity, increasing 1.5-fold between 23°C and 37°C, suggesting that the folding kinetics are dominated by the entropic barrier. Our results provide a direct quantitative measurement of G4 energy landscapes.
期刊介绍:
BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.