{"title":"Gender Differences in the Development of Growth and Fixed Mindsets Among Chinese Adolescents: A Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analysis.","authors":"Shuting Li, Yang Gao, Sha Tao, Daoyang Wang","doi":"10.1002/jad.70287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Students' mindsets about the malleability of their abilities shape their academic performance, social adaptation, and psychological well-being, making it important to track how these beliefs change during adolescence. Although mindsets undergo substantial change in this period, most studies have used latent variable models that ignore the dynamic interactions among mindset items. Examining how specific items change over time can thus reveal how mindsets develop and whether this process differs between boys and girls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined the temporal links among the 10 growth mindset items and the 10 fixed mindset items, identifying the central beliefs within each network, in 15,386 students (40% girls; <math> <mrow> <mrow><msub><mi>M</mi> <mi>age</mi></msub> </mrow> </mrow> </math> = 16.73 years) from 31 secondary vocational schools in China, followed annually over 3 years. Mixed-design ANOVA and cross-lagged panel network (CLPN) analysis were used to compare mindset development between genders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Boys consistently reported higher aggregate scores on both growth and fixed mindsets than girls, though these differences were small. The CLPN analysis showed gender-specific trajectories: girls showed earlier and more pronounced changes in the growth mindset network, whereas boys showed slower integration of growth-related beliefs. By contrast, the fixed mindset networks developed similarly across genders. Item-level cross-lagged associations were small, and network comparisons were descriptive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conceptualizing mindsets as interconnected networks, this study identifies gender-specific developmental patterns in mindset organization among Chinese vocational students, showing how mindset items co-develop over time and suggesting candidate targets for gender-sensitive interventions in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":48397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.70287","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Students' mindsets about the malleability of their abilities shape their academic performance, social adaptation, and psychological well-being, making it important to track how these beliefs change during adolescence. Although mindsets undergo substantial change in this period, most studies have used latent variable models that ignore the dynamic interactions among mindset items. Examining how specific items change over time can thus reveal how mindsets develop and whether this process differs between boys and girls.
Methods: This study examined the temporal links among the 10 growth mindset items and the 10 fixed mindset items, identifying the central beliefs within each network, in 15,386 students (40% girls; = 16.73 years) from 31 secondary vocational schools in China, followed annually over 3 years. Mixed-design ANOVA and cross-lagged panel network (CLPN) analysis were used to compare mindset development between genders.
Results: Boys consistently reported higher aggregate scores on both growth and fixed mindsets than girls, though these differences were small. The CLPN analysis showed gender-specific trajectories: girls showed earlier and more pronounced changes in the growth mindset network, whereas boys showed slower integration of growth-related beliefs. By contrast, the fixed mindset networks developed similarly across genders. Item-level cross-lagged associations were small, and network comparisons were descriptive.
Conclusions: Conceptualizing mindsets as interconnected networks, this study identifies gender-specific developmental patterns in mindset organization among Chinese vocational students, showing how mindset items co-develop over time and suggesting candidate targets for gender-sensitive interventions in the future.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Adolescence is an international, broad based, cross-disciplinary journal that addresses issues of professional and academic importance concerning development between puberty and the attainment of adult status within society. It provides a forum for all who are concerned with the nature of adolescence, whether involved in teaching, research, guidance, counseling, treatment, or other services. The aim of the journal is to encourage research and foster good practice through publishing both empirical and clinical studies as well as integrative reviews and theoretical advances.