Gender Differences in the Development of Growth and Fixed Mindsets Among Chinese Adolescents: A Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analysis.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Shuting Li, Yang Gao, Sha Tao, Daoyang Wang
{"title":"Gender Differences in the Development of Growth and Fixed Mindsets Among Chinese Adolescents: A Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analysis.","authors":"Shuting Li, Yang Gao, Sha Tao, Daoyang Wang","doi":"10.1002/jad.70287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Students' mindsets about the malleability of their abilities shape their academic performance, social adaptation, and psychological well-being, making it important to track how these beliefs change during adolescence. Although mindsets undergo substantial change in this period, most studies have used latent variable models that ignore the dynamic interactions among mindset items. Examining how specific items change over time can thus reveal how mindsets develop and whether this process differs between boys and girls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined the temporal links among the 10 growth mindset items and the 10 fixed mindset items, identifying the central beliefs within each network, in 15,386 students (40% girls; <math> <mrow> <mrow><msub><mi>M</mi> <mi>age</mi></msub> </mrow> </mrow> </math>  = 16.73 years) from 31 secondary vocational schools in China, followed annually over 3 years. Mixed-design ANOVA and cross-lagged panel network (CLPN) analysis were used to compare mindset development between genders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Boys consistently reported higher aggregate scores on both growth and fixed mindsets than girls, though these differences were small. The CLPN analysis showed gender-specific trajectories: girls showed earlier and more pronounced changes in the growth mindset network, whereas boys showed slower integration of growth-related beliefs. By contrast, the fixed mindset networks developed similarly across genders. Item-level cross-lagged associations were small, and network comparisons were descriptive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conceptualizing mindsets as interconnected networks, this study identifies gender-specific developmental patterns in mindset organization among Chinese vocational students, showing how mindset items co-develop over time and suggesting candidate targets for gender-sensitive interventions in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":48397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.70287","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Students' mindsets about the malleability of their abilities shape their academic performance, social adaptation, and psychological well-being, making it important to track how these beliefs change during adolescence. Although mindsets undergo substantial change in this period, most studies have used latent variable models that ignore the dynamic interactions among mindset items. Examining how specific items change over time can thus reveal how mindsets develop and whether this process differs between boys and girls.

Methods: This study examined the temporal links among the 10 growth mindset items and the 10 fixed mindset items, identifying the central beliefs within each network, in 15,386 students (40% girls; M age  = 16.73 years) from 31 secondary vocational schools in China, followed annually over 3 years. Mixed-design ANOVA and cross-lagged panel network (CLPN) analysis were used to compare mindset development between genders.

Results: Boys consistently reported higher aggregate scores on both growth and fixed mindsets than girls, though these differences were small. The CLPN analysis showed gender-specific trajectories: girls showed earlier and more pronounced changes in the growth mindset network, whereas boys showed slower integration of growth-related beliefs. By contrast, the fixed mindset networks developed similarly across genders. Item-level cross-lagged associations were small, and network comparisons were descriptive.

Conclusions: Conceptualizing mindsets as interconnected networks, this study identifies gender-specific developmental patterns in mindset organization among Chinese vocational students, showing how mindset items co-develop over time and suggesting candidate targets for gender-sensitive interventions in the future.

中国青少年成长与固定心态发展的性别差异:一个交叉滞后的面板网络分析。
学生对自己能力可塑性的看法塑造了他们的学习成绩、社会适应和心理健康,因此跟踪这些看法在青春期的变化是很重要的。尽管在这一时期,心态发生了实质性的变化,但大多数研究都使用了潜在变量模型,忽略了心态项目之间的动态相互作用。因此,研究具体项目如何随着时间的推移而变化,可以揭示心态是如何形成的,以及这一过程在男孩和女孩之间是否有所不同。方法:本研究以中国31所中等职业学校的15386名学生(40%为女生,年龄= 16.73岁)为研究对象,每年进行为期3年的跟踪调查,考察了10个成长心态项目和10个固定心态项目之间的时间联系,确定了每个网络中的中心信念。使用混合设计方差分析和交叉滞后面板网络(CLPN)分析比较性别之间的心态发展。结果:男孩在成长和固定心态方面的总得分一直高于女孩,尽管这些差异很小。CLPN分析显示了性别差异的轨迹:女孩在成长心态网络中表现出更早、更明显的变化,而男孩在成长相关信念的整合方面表现得更慢。相比之下,固定心态网络在男女之间的发展相似。项目水平的交叉滞后关联很小,网络比较是描述性的。结论:本研究将心态概念化为相互关联的网络,确定了中国职校学生心态组织的性别发展模式,展示了心态项目如何随着时间的推移共同发展,并提出了未来性别敏感干预的候选目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescence
Journal of Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: The Journal of Adolescence is an international, broad based, cross-disciplinary journal that addresses issues of professional and academic importance concerning development between puberty and the attainment of adult status within society. It provides a forum for all who are concerned with the nature of adolescence, whether involved in teaching, research, guidance, counseling, treatment, or other services. The aim of the journal is to encourage research and foster good practice through publishing both empirical and clinical studies as well as integrative reviews and theoretical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书