{"title":"Bilateral erector spinae and biceps femoris co-activation following unilateral hamstring injury in young sprinters.","authors":"Eleftherios Kellis, Vasilios Baltzopoulos","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2026.2750589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared coactivation and strength of the erector spinae (ES) and biceps femoris long head (BFLH) during isometric knee flexion and trunk extension in sprinters with a recent BFLH injury. Twenty-four sprinters with grade 2 BFLH injury and 21 controls performed prone trunk extension and knee flexion maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) at 90° and 0° knee flexion. Torque and surface electromyography (EMG) of the ES and BFLH were recorded bilaterally and normalized to MVCs during 30° trunk extension and 0° knee flexion, respectively. Previously injured athletes showed a greater co-contraction index (CCI) during knee flexion at 0° and 90° than controls (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with higher ES activation (32.52 ± 17.08 to 47.72 ± 17.83% MVC) than the uninjured group (21.56 ± 14.52 to 44.68 ± 18.02% MVC; <i>p</i> < 0.05). No group differences were found in normalized BFLH EMG, CCI during trunk extension, or absolute knee flexion or trunk extension strength (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Previously injured sprinters showed larger between-limb knee flexion strength asymmetries (>10%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), which were absent in controls. This paraspinal overactivation and increased trunk-hamstring co-contraction after BFLH injury suggest that lumbopelvic control exercises may be beneficial for preventing BFLH re-injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2026.2750589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study compared coactivation and strength of the erector spinae (ES) and biceps femoris long head (BFLH) during isometric knee flexion and trunk extension in sprinters with a recent BFLH injury. Twenty-four sprinters with grade 2 BFLH injury and 21 controls performed prone trunk extension and knee flexion maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) at 90° and 0° knee flexion. Torque and surface electromyography (EMG) of the ES and BFLH were recorded bilaterally and normalized to MVCs during 30° trunk extension and 0° knee flexion, respectively. Previously injured athletes showed a greater co-contraction index (CCI) during knee flexion at 0° and 90° than controls (p < 0.001), with higher ES activation (32.52 ± 17.08 to 47.72 ± 17.83% MVC) than the uninjured group (21.56 ± 14.52 to 44.68 ± 18.02% MVC; p < 0.05). No group differences were found in normalized BFLH EMG, CCI during trunk extension, or absolute knee flexion or trunk extension strength (p > 0.05). Previously injured sprinters showed larger between-limb knee flexion strength asymmetries (>10%, p < 0.01), which were absent in controls. This paraspinal overactivation and increased trunk-hamstring co-contraction after BFLH injury suggest that lumbopelvic control exercises may be beneficial for preventing BFLH re-injury.
本研究比较了最近发生直竖棘和股长头二头肌损伤的短跑运动员在等距膝关节屈曲和躯干伸展时,直竖棘(ES)和股长头二头肌(BFLH)的协同激活和强度。24名2级BFLH损伤的短跑运动员和21名对照组在90°和0°膝关节屈曲时进行俯卧躯干伸展和膝关节屈曲最大自主收缩(MVCs)。分别记录躯干伸展30°和膝关节屈曲0°时ES和BFLH的扭矩和表面肌电图(EMG),并归一化为mvc。先前受伤的运动员在膝关节屈曲0°和90°时的共收缩指数(CCI)高于对照组(p p p > 0.05)。先前受伤的短跑运动员表现出更大的肢间膝关节屈曲强度不对称(bbb10 %, p
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives.
The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.