Bilateral erector spinae and biceps femoris co-activation following unilateral hamstring injury in young sprinters.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Eleftherios Kellis, Vasilios Baltzopoulos
{"title":"Bilateral erector spinae and biceps femoris co-activation following unilateral hamstring injury in young sprinters.","authors":"Eleftherios Kellis, Vasilios Baltzopoulos","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2026.2750589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared coactivation and strength of the erector spinae (ES) and biceps femoris long head (BFLH) during isometric knee flexion and trunk extension in sprinters with a recent BFLH injury. Twenty-four sprinters with grade 2 BFLH injury and 21 controls performed prone trunk extension and knee flexion maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) at 90° and 0° knee flexion. Torque and surface electromyography (EMG) of the ES and BFLH were recorded bilaterally and normalized to MVCs during 30° trunk extension and 0° knee flexion, respectively. Previously injured athletes showed a greater co-contraction index (CCI) during knee flexion at 0° and 90° than controls (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with higher ES activation (32.52 ± 17.08 to 47.72 ± 17.83% MVC) than the uninjured group (21.56 ± 14.52 to 44.68 ± 18.02% MVC; <i>p</i> < 0.05). No group differences were found in normalized BFLH EMG, CCI during trunk extension, or absolute knee flexion or trunk extension strength (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Previously injured sprinters showed larger between-limb knee flexion strength asymmetries (>10%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), which were absent in controls. This paraspinal overactivation and increased trunk-hamstring co-contraction after BFLH injury suggest that lumbopelvic control exercises may be beneficial for preventing BFLH re-injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2026.2750589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared coactivation and strength of the erector spinae (ES) and biceps femoris long head (BFLH) during isometric knee flexion and trunk extension in sprinters with a recent BFLH injury. Twenty-four sprinters with grade 2 BFLH injury and 21 controls performed prone trunk extension and knee flexion maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) at 90° and 0° knee flexion. Torque and surface electromyography (EMG) of the ES and BFLH were recorded bilaterally and normalized to MVCs during 30° trunk extension and 0° knee flexion, respectively. Previously injured athletes showed a greater co-contraction index (CCI) during knee flexion at 0° and 90° than controls (p < 0.001), with higher ES activation (32.52 ± 17.08 to 47.72 ± 17.83% MVC) than the uninjured group (21.56 ± 14.52 to 44.68 ± 18.02% MVC; p < 0.05). No group differences were found in normalized BFLH EMG, CCI during trunk extension, or absolute knee flexion or trunk extension strength (p > 0.05). Previously injured sprinters showed larger between-limb knee flexion strength asymmetries (>10%, p < 0.01), which were absent in controls. This paraspinal overactivation and increased trunk-hamstring co-contraction after BFLH injury suggest that lumbopelvic control exercises may be beneficial for preventing BFLH re-injury.

年轻短跑运动员单侧腘绳肌损伤后双侧竖脊肌和股二头肌的共同激活。
本研究比较了最近发生直竖棘和股长头二头肌损伤的短跑运动员在等距膝关节屈曲和躯干伸展时,直竖棘(ES)和股长头二头肌(BFLH)的协同激活和强度。24名2级BFLH损伤的短跑运动员和21名对照组在90°和0°膝关节屈曲时进行俯卧躯干伸展和膝关节屈曲最大自主收缩(MVCs)。分别记录躯干伸展30°和膝关节屈曲0°时ES和BFLH的扭矩和表面肌电图(EMG),并归一化为mvc。先前受伤的运动员在膝关节屈曲0°和90°时的共收缩指数(CCI)高于对照组(p p p > 0.05)。先前受伤的短跑运动员表现出更大的肢间膝关节屈曲强度不对称(bbb10 %, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书