Alejandra Sandoval Villarreal, Paola Neuta-Arciniegas, John Jairo Cabrera-López, Álvaro José Rojas Arciniegas
{"title":"Effects of electrical stimulation on the cardiogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells: A systematic review.","authors":"Alejandra Sandoval Villarreal, Paola Neuta-Arciniegas, John Jairo Cabrera-López, Álvaro José Rojas Arciniegas","doi":"10.1007/s10616-026-01065-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electrical stimulation has emerged as a promising strategy for promoting cardiogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells; however, the available evidence remains highly heterogeneous across stimulation parameters, experimental platforms, and outcome measures. This systematic review synthesized the available in vitro evidence regarding the effects of electrical stimulation on MSC cardiogenic differentiation, with particular emphasis on stimulation parameters, experimental platforms and biological outcomes related to early cardiogenic commitment and structural maturation. A systematic search was conducted in seven electronic databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Fifteen preclinical in vitro studies met the eligibility criteria. Human-derived MSCs were the most frequently investigated cell source and carbon-based electrodes were the most commonly reported conductive material. Across the included studies, electrical stimulation was frequently associated with morphological changes and increased expression of markers related to early cardiogenic commitment and structural maturation, although findings were inconsistent for some outcomes. A stimulation frequency of 1 Hz, pulse widths of 5 ms, and stimulation periods of approximately two weeks were the most frequently employed conditions. Nevertheless, substantial heterogeneity in stimulation parameters, experimental platforms and outcome measures precluded direct comparisons among studies and prevented identification of an optimal stimulation protocol. Overall, the available evidence suggests that electrical stimulation may represent a promising strategy for promoting the cardiogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro; however, greater methodological standardization, standardized outcome assessment and functional characterization are required before definitive conclusions regarding its effectiveness and optimal stimulation protocols can be established.</p><p><strong>Graphical abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-026-01065-w.</p>","PeriodicalId":10890,"journal":{"name":"Cytotechnology","volume":"78 6","pages":"215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13676602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-026-01065-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Electrical stimulation has emerged as a promising strategy for promoting cardiogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells; however, the available evidence remains highly heterogeneous across stimulation parameters, experimental platforms, and outcome measures. This systematic review synthesized the available in vitro evidence regarding the effects of electrical stimulation on MSC cardiogenic differentiation, with particular emphasis on stimulation parameters, experimental platforms and biological outcomes related to early cardiogenic commitment and structural maturation. A systematic search was conducted in seven electronic databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Fifteen preclinical in vitro studies met the eligibility criteria. Human-derived MSCs were the most frequently investigated cell source and carbon-based electrodes were the most commonly reported conductive material. Across the included studies, electrical stimulation was frequently associated with morphological changes and increased expression of markers related to early cardiogenic commitment and structural maturation, although findings were inconsistent for some outcomes. A stimulation frequency of 1 Hz, pulse widths of 5 ms, and stimulation periods of approximately two weeks were the most frequently employed conditions. Nevertheless, substantial heterogeneity in stimulation parameters, experimental platforms and outcome measures precluded direct comparisons among studies and prevented identification of an optimal stimulation protocol. Overall, the available evidence suggests that electrical stimulation may represent a promising strategy for promoting the cardiogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro; however, greater methodological standardization, standardized outcome assessment and functional characterization are required before definitive conclusions regarding its effectiveness and optimal stimulation protocols can be established.
Graphical abstract:
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-026-01065-w.
期刊介绍:
The scope of the Journal includes:
1. The derivation, genetic modification and characterization of cell lines, genetic and phenotypic regulation, control of cellular metabolism, cell physiology and biochemistry related to cell function, performance and expression of cell products.
2. Cell culture techniques, substrates, environmental requirements and optimization, cloning, hybridization and molecular biology, including genomic and proteomic tools.
3. Cell culture systems, processes, reactors, scale-up, and industrial production. Descriptions of the design or construction of equipment, media or quality control procedures, that are ancillary to cellular research.
4. The application of animal/human cells in research in the field of stem cell research including maintenance of stemness, differentiation, genetics, and senescence, cancer research, research in immunology, as well as applications in tissue engineering and gene therapy.
5. The use of cell cultures as a substrate for bioassays, biomedical applications and in particular as a replacement for animal models.