Application of Machine Learning Models to Predict Tigecycline Exposure in Critically Ill Patients Using Different Limited Sampling Strategies.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Drug Design, Development and Therapy Pub Date : 2026-10-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S630414
Anran Dai, Hao Liu, Bo Yang, Feiyue Zheng, Yan Guan, Jieqiong Liu, Jianping Zhu, Gang Liang, Yi Yang, Lingyan Yu, Yuhua Zhao, Zhenwei Yu
{"title":"Application of Machine Learning Models to Predict Tigecycline Exposure in Critically Ill Patients Using Different Limited Sampling Strategies.","authors":"Anran Dai, Hao Liu, Bo Yang, Feiyue Zheng, Yan Guan, Jieqiong Liu, Jianping Zhu, Gang Liang, Yi Yang, Lingyan Yu, Yuhua Zhao, Zhenwei Yu","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S630414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The high variability in the pharmacokinetics of tigecycline may impact therapeutic efficacy, particularly in critically ill patients. This study introduces machine learning (ML) methods, aiming to clarify their effectiveness in individualized drug exposure prediction and determine the optimal modeling strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to screen the covariates. Four ML models, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron, and long short-term memory network (LSTM), were trained and tested using 751 concentrations from 98 patients in the pharmacokinetic dataset to predict the area under the steady-state plasma concentration-time curve within 24 hours (AUC<sub>0-24h</sub>) of tigecycline. Furthermore, on the internal test set, we evaluated the accuracy of the published tigecycline Population Pharmacokinetics (PopPK) models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven covariates were screened out by LASSO method, including total bilirubin, creatinine clearance, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, body mass index, serum creatinine, age, and prothrombin time. Internal validation showed that, among the four ML models, the LSTM model performed the best, with the combination of covariates and the plasma concentration feature \"C<sub>0</sub> + C<sub>0.5</sub> + C<sub>6</sub>\" exhibited the optimal predictive performance (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.887, RMSE: 2.496 mg·h/L, F<sub>20</sub>: 75%). In comparison, the model combining covariates with C<sub>0</sub> was the most concise and better suited to practical computational conditions; its LSTM model was comparable to some PopPK models in terms of overall trend fitting and systematic bias control (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.818, RMSE: 3.164 mg·h/L, F<sub>20</sub> = 60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LSTM model established in this study enables an accurate estimate of tigecycline AUC<sub>0-24h</sub>. Three-point sampling provided the lowest prediction error, whereas C<sub>0</sub> alone reduced the sampling burden. These findings provide an effective modeling reference for tigecycline therapeutic drug monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"20 ","pages":"630414"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13676858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S630414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The high variability in the pharmacokinetics of tigecycline may impact therapeutic efficacy, particularly in critically ill patients. This study introduces machine learning (ML) methods, aiming to clarify their effectiveness in individualized drug exposure prediction and determine the optimal modeling strategy.

Methods: The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to screen the covariates. Four ML models, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron, and long short-term memory network (LSTM), were trained and tested using 751 concentrations from 98 patients in the pharmacokinetic dataset to predict the area under the steady-state plasma concentration-time curve within 24 hours (AUC0-24h) of tigecycline. Furthermore, on the internal test set, we evaluated the accuracy of the published tigecycline Population Pharmacokinetics (PopPK) models.

Results: Seven covariates were screened out by LASSO method, including total bilirubin, creatinine clearance, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, body mass index, serum creatinine, age, and prothrombin time. Internal validation showed that, among the four ML models, the LSTM model performed the best, with the combination of covariates and the plasma concentration feature "C0 + C0.5 + C6" exhibited the optimal predictive performance (R2: 0.887, RMSE: 2.496 mg·h/L, F20: 75%). In comparison, the model combining covariates with C0 was the most concise and better suited to practical computational conditions; its LSTM model was comparable to some PopPK models in terms of overall trend fitting and systematic bias control (R2: 0.818, RMSE: 3.164 mg·h/L, F20 = 60%).

Conclusion: The LSTM model established in this study enables an accurate estimate of tigecycline AUC0-24h. Three-point sampling provided the lowest prediction error, whereas C0 alone reduced the sampling burden. These findings provide an effective modeling reference for tigecycline therapeutic drug monitoring.

机器学习模型在不同有限采样策略下预测重症患者替加环素暴露中的应用
背景:替加环素药代动力学的高度变异性可能影响治疗效果,特别是对危重患者。本研究引入机器学习(ML)方法,旨在阐明其在个体化药物暴露预测中的有效性,并确定最佳建模策略。方法:采用最小绝对收缩选择算子(LASSO)法筛选协变量。随机森林、极端梯度增强、多层感知器和长短期记忆网络(LSTM)四种ML模型进行了训练和测试,使用来自98名患者的药代动力学数据集中的751个浓度来预测替加环素在24小时内(AUC0-24h)稳态血浆浓度-时间曲线下的面积。此外,在内部测试集上,我们评估了已发表的替加环素群体药代动力学(PopPK)模型的准确性。结果:LASSO法筛选出7个协变量,包括总胆红素、肌酐清除率、序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)、体重指数、血清肌酐、年龄和凝血酶原时间。内部验证结果表明,在4种ML模型中,LSTM模型的预测效果最好,其中协变量组合及血药浓度特征“C0 + C0.5 + C6”的预测效果最佳(R2: 0.887, RMSE: 2.496 mg·h/L, F20: 75%)。相比之下,协变量与C0结合的模型最简洁,更适合实际计算条件;LSTM模型在总体趋势拟合和系统偏倚控制方面与部分PopPK模型相当(R2: 0.818, RMSE: 3.164 mg·h/L, F20 = 60%)。结论:本研究建立的LSTM模型能够准确估计替加环素AUC0-24h。三点抽样提供了最低的预测误差,而C0单独减少了抽样负担。这些发现为替加环素治疗药物监测提供了有效的建模参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Drug Design, Development and Therapy CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
382
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas. Specific topics covered by the journal include: Drug target identification and validation Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery* Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes) Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes Fragment-based drug discovery Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products** Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing) Preclinical development studies Translational animal models Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways Toxicology Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics Clinical drug evaluation Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书