Anran Dai, Hao Liu, Bo Yang, Feiyue Zheng, Yan Guan, Jieqiong Liu, Jianping Zhu, Gang Liang, Yi Yang, Lingyan Yu, Yuhua Zhao, Zhenwei Yu
{"title":"Application of Machine Learning Models to Predict Tigecycline Exposure in Critically Ill Patients Using Different Limited Sampling Strategies.","authors":"Anran Dai, Hao Liu, Bo Yang, Feiyue Zheng, Yan Guan, Jieqiong Liu, Jianping Zhu, Gang Liang, Yi Yang, Lingyan Yu, Yuhua Zhao, Zhenwei Yu","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S630414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The high variability in the pharmacokinetics of tigecycline may impact therapeutic efficacy, particularly in critically ill patients. This study introduces machine learning (ML) methods, aiming to clarify their effectiveness in individualized drug exposure prediction and determine the optimal modeling strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to screen the covariates. Four ML models, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron, and long short-term memory network (LSTM), were trained and tested using 751 concentrations from 98 patients in the pharmacokinetic dataset to predict the area under the steady-state plasma concentration-time curve within 24 hours (AUC<sub>0-24h</sub>) of tigecycline. Furthermore, on the internal test set, we evaluated the accuracy of the published tigecycline Population Pharmacokinetics (PopPK) models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven covariates were screened out by LASSO method, including total bilirubin, creatinine clearance, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, body mass index, serum creatinine, age, and prothrombin time. Internal validation showed that, among the four ML models, the LSTM model performed the best, with the combination of covariates and the plasma concentration feature \"C<sub>0</sub> + C<sub>0.5</sub> + C<sub>6</sub>\" exhibited the optimal predictive performance (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.887, RMSE: 2.496 mg·h/L, F<sub>20</sub>: 75%). In comparison, the model combining covariates with C<sub>0</sub> was the most concise and better suited to practical computational conditions; its LSTM model was comparable to some PopPK models in terms of overall trend fitting and systematic bias control (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.818, RMSE: 3.164 mg·h/L, F<sub>20</sub> = 60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LSTM model established in this study enables an accurate estimate of tigecycline AUC<sub>0-24h</sub>. Three-point sampling provided the lowest prediction error, whereas C<sub>0</sub> alone reduced the sampling burden. These findings provide an effective modeling reference for tigecycline therapeutic drug monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"20 ","pages":"630414"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13676858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S630414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The high variability in the pharmacokinetics of tigecycline may impact therapeutic efficacy, particularly in critically ill patients. This study introduces machine learning (ML) methods, aiming to clarify their effectiveness in individualized drug exposure prediction and determine the optimal modeling strategy.
Methods: The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to screen the covariates. Four ML models, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron, and long short-term memory network (LSTM), were trained and tested using 751 concentrations from 98 patients in the pharmacokinetic dataset to predict the area under the steady-state plasma concentration-time curve within 24 hours (AUC0-24h) of tigecycline. Furthermore, on the internal test set, we evaluated the accuracy of the published tigecycline Population Pharmacokinetics (PopPK) models.
Results: Seven covariates were screened out by LASSO method, including total bilirubin, creatinine clearance, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, body mass index, serum creatinine, age, and prothrombin time. Internal validation showed that, among the four ML models, the LSTM model performed the best, with the combination of covariates and the plasma concentration feature "C0 + C0.5 + C6" exhibited the optimal predictive performance (R2: 0.887, RMSE: 2.496 mg·h/L, F20: 75%). In comparison, the model combining covariates with C0 was the most concise and better suited to practical computational conditions; its LSTM model was comparable to some PopPK models in terms of overall trend fitting and systematic bias control (R2: 0.818, RMSE: 3.164 mg·h/L, F20 = 60%).
Conclusion: The LSTM model established in this study enables an accurate estimate of tigecycline AUC0-24h. Three-point sampling provided the lowest prediction error, whereas C0 alone reduced the sampling burden. These findings provide an effective modeling reference for tigecycline therapeutic drug monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications.
The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas.
Specific topics covered by the journal include:
Drug target identification and validation
Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution
Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways
New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery*
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes)
Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes
Fragment-based drug discovery
Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology
Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products**
Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development
Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing)
Preclinical development studies
Translational animal models
Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways
Toxicology
Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy
Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics
Clinical drug evaluation
Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.