A global analysis of land snail diversity on islands

IF 9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Konstantinos Proios, Albert B. Phillimore, François Rigal, Thomas J. Matthews, Dimitris Poursanidis, Robert A. D. Cameron, Kostas A. Triantis, Robert J. Whittaker
{"title":"A global analysis of land snail diversity on islands","authors":"Konstantinos Proios, Albert B. Phillimore, François Rigal, Thomas J. Matthews, Dimitris Poursanidis, Robert A. D. Cameron, Kostas A. Triantis, Robert J. Whittaker","doi":"10.1002/ecm.70078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Explaining spatiotemporal disparities in island species‐richness (ISR) is a fundamental pursuit in (macro)ecology and biogeography. While most research has focused on vertebrates and vascular plants, invertebrates—representing ~70% of global species—remain understudied. Using data from 727 islands worldwide, we evaluate the impact of 14 key biogeographic variables, including island area, isolation, climate, energy, environmental heterogeneity, and human presence, on different insular land snail chorotypes: total indigenous richness, archipelagic endemics, including multiple‐ and single‐island endemics, and native non‐endemics. We find that these variables jointly explain 80%–84% of inter‐island variation in endemic ISR, substantially enhancing explanatory power beyond what can be attributed to traditional species–area and species–energy relationships. In contrast, native non‐endemic ISR, although partially explained by area or energy alone, is predominantly influenced by other unaccounted factors including source‐pool effects. Driver significance varies among chorotypes, illustrating the capture of distinct biogeographic processes (speciation vs. colonization) per chorotype. Our findings show that factors influencing land snail ISR broadly align with those for vertebrates and plants while revealing significant variation in community assembly processes across chorotypes. Thus, our study provides a step towards a unified theory of diversity, encompassing chorotypes as fundamental ISR components, and invertebrates, which comprise most island animal diversity.","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.70078","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Explaining spatiotemporal disparities in island species‐richness (ISR) is a fundamental pursuit in (macro)ecology and biogeography. While most research has focused on vertebrates and vascular plants, invertebrates—representing ~70% of global species—remain understudied. Using data from 727 islands worldwide, we evaluate the impact of 14 key biogeographic variables, including island area, isolation, climate, energy, environmental heterogeneity, and human presence, on different insular land snail chorotypes: total indigenous richness, archipelagic endemics, including multiple‐ and single‐island endemics, and native non‐endemics. We find that these variables jointly explain 80%–84% of inter‐island variation in endemic ISR, substantially enhancing explanatory power beyond what can be attributed to traditional species–area and species–energy relationships. In contrast, native non‐endemic ISR, although partially explained by area or energy alone, is predominantly influenced by other unaccounted factors including source‐pool effects. Driver significance varies among chorotypes, illustrating the capture of distinct biogeographic processes (speciation vs. colonization) per chorotype. Our findings show that factors influencing land snail ISR broadly align with those for vertebrates and plants while revealing significant variation in community assembly processes across chorotypes. Thus, our study provides a step towards a unified theory of diversity, encompassing chorotypes as fundamental ISR components, and invertebrates, which comprise most island animal diversity.
岛屿陆地蜗牛多样性的全球分析
解释岛屿物种丰富度(ISR)的时空差异是宏观生态学和生物地理学的基本研究方向。虽然大多数研究集中在脊椎动物和维管植物上,但占全球物种约70%的无脊椎动物仍未得到充分研究。利用来自全球727个岛屿的数据,我们评估了14个关键生物地理变量(包括岛屿面积、隔离程度、气候、能源、环境异质性和人类存在)对不同岛屿陆地蜗牛脉型的影响:总本土丰富度、群岛特有物种(包括多岛和单岛特有物种)和本地非特有物种。我们发现,这些变量共同解释了地方性ISR中80%-84%的岛间变异,大大提高了传统物种-面积和物种-能量关系的解释力。相比之下,本地非地方性ISR,虽然部分由面积或能量单独解释,但主要受到其他未考虑因素的影响,包括源池效应。驱动意义在不同的色型之间有所不同,说明每个色型捕获不同的生物地理过程(物种形成与定植)。我们的研究结果表明,影响蜗牛ISR的因素与脊椎动物和植物的因素大致一致,同时揭示了不同脉型的群落组装过程的显著差异。因此,我们的研究向多样性的统一理论迈出了一步,包括作为基本ISR组成部分的脉型和构成大多数岛屿动物多样性的无脊椎动物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书