Why Social Egg Freezing for Single Women Should Not Be Prohibited: A Confucian Perspective.

IF 2.3 2区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Bioethics Pub Date : 2026-10-17 DOI:10.1111/bioe.70202
Rui Deng, Ruiping Fan
{"title":"Why Social Egg Freezing for Single Women Should Not Be Prohibited: A Confucian Perspective.","authors":"Rui Deng, Ruiping Fan","doi":"10.1111/bioe.70202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Beginning with a recent high-profile case in mainland China, this paper argues that the current prohibition on social egg freezing for single women cannot be justified from a Confucian ethical perspective. We first explain why Confucian ethics provides a normatively appropriate and socially salient framework for evaluating reproductive policy in the Chinese context. We then articulate a theoretical model that we term Confucian familist virtue ethics. A central contribution of the paper is to distinguish between Confucian ethical ideals and its minimal standards. While the ideals-such as timely marriage and childbearing within an intact family-are properly the objects of moral aspiration and voluntary cultivation, only violations of the minimal standards warrant legal prohibition. On this basis, we develop three lines of argument to show that although social egg freezing by single women may fall short of Confucian aspirational ideals, it does not violate the ethical minimum. Accordingly, it does not justify coercive state intervention. Finally, we examine the predictive concern that permitting social egg freezing would undermine marital norms or substantially increase single motherhood. We argue that such negative effects are empirically uncertain and in principle manageable through regulatory design. They therefore fail to provide sufficient grounds for a categorical prohibition.</p>","PeriodicalId":55379,"journal":{"name":"Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beginning with a recent high-profile case in mainland China, this paper argues that the current prohibition on social egg freezing for single women cannot be justified from a Confucian ethical perspective. We first explain why Confucian ethics provides a normatively appropriate and socially salient framework for evaluating reproductive policy in the Chinese context. We then articulate a theoretical model that we term Confucian familist virtue ethics. A central contribution of the paper is to distinguish between Confucian ethical ideals and its minimal standards. While the ideals-such as timely marriage and childbearing within an intact family-are properly the objects of moral aspiration and voluntary cultivation, only violations of the minimal standards warrant legal prohibition. On this basis, we develop three lines of argument to show that although social egg freezing by single women may fall short of Confucian aspirational ideals, it does not violate the ethical minimum. Accordingly, it does not justify coercive state intervention. Finally, we examine the predictive concern that permitting social egg freezing would undermine marital norms or substantially increase single motherhood. We argue that such negative effects are empirically uncertain and in principle manageable through regulatory design. They therefore fail to provide sufficient grounds for a categorical prohibition.

为什么不应该禁止单身女性社交冻卵:一个儒家的观点。
本文以最近发生在中国大陆的一个备受瞩目的案例为例,论证了目前对单身女性社会冷冻卵子的禁令从儒家伦理的角度来看是不合理的。我们首先解释为什么儒家伦理为评估中国背景下的生育政策提供了一个规范的、适当的和社会显著的框架。然后我们阐述了一个理论模型,我们称之为儒家家庭美德伦理。这篇论文的一个核心贡献是区分了儒家的伦理理想和它的最低标准。虽然这些理想——比如在一个完整的家庭中及时结婚和生育——是道德理想和自愿培养的对象,但只有违反最低标准的行为才值得法律禁止。在此基础上,我们发展了三条论据来表明,尽管单身女性的社会冻卵可能达不到儒家的理想,但它并不违反道德底线。因此,它不能成为国家强制干预的理由。最后,我们研究了允许社会卵子冷冻会破坏婚姻规范或大幅增加单身母亲的预测担忧。我们认为,这种负面影响在经验上是不确定的,原则上可以通过监管设计来管理。因此,它们不能提供明确禁止的充分理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioethics
Bioethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As medical technology continues to develop, the subject of bioethics has an ever increasing practical relevance for all those working in philosophy, medicine, law, sociology, public policy, education and related fields. Bioethics provides a forum for well-argued articles on the ethical questions raised by current issues such as: international collaborative clinical research in developing countries; public health; infectious disease; AIDS; managed care; genomics and stem cell research. These questions are considered in relation to concrete ethical, legal and policy problems, or in terms of the fundamental concepts, principles and theories used in discussions of such problems. Bioethics also features regular Background Briefings on important current debates in the field. These feature articles provide excellent material for bioethics scholars, teachers and students alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书