Development and validation of predictive models for undiagnosed Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in the emergency department.

IF 4.4 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Natalia Festa, Kelsey Alexovitz, Natalia Sifnugel, Inessa Cohen, Siddarth Khasnavis, Juan Young, Mark Iscoe, Adam P Mecca, Ling Han, Ula Hwang
{"title":"Development and validation of predictive models for undiagnosed Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in the emergency department.","authors":"Natalia Festa, Kelsey Alexovitz, Natalia Sifnugel, Inessa Cohen, Siddarth Khasnavis, Juan Young, Mark Iscoe, Adam P Mecca, Ling Han, Ula Hwang","doi":"10.1002/dad2.70512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The electronic health record (EHR) offers a promising resource to improve recognition of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD), yet existing approaches have been developed within cohorts that underrepresent individuals prone to underdiagnosis and do not differentiate disease severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied a validated computational phenotype to identify probable ADRD (p-ADRD) and its severity within a random sample of 5000 individuals aged ≥65 years who presented to one of nine emergency departments in the Yale New Haven Health System (2014 to 2022). The dichotomous outcome was undiagnosed ADRD, assigned to those meeting criteria for p-ADRD but lacking validated diagnostic codes. We applied logistic regression with elastic net regularization to predict undiagnosed status for the overall cohort and within each severity stratum, assessing performance using 10-fold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1358 individuals with p-ADRD (mean age 86.7 years, standard deviation 7.4), 934 (68.8%) were undiagnosed. The overall model discriminated undiagnosed ADRD with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83 to 0.87). The severity-stratified models achieved AUROC of 0.80 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.83) for mild and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.94) for moderate to severe disease. Although the predictors of undiagnosed status differed by severity, fall-related injury was protective against underdiagnosis within each stratum.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We developed and validated predictive models using structured EHR elements, which demonstrated robust discrimination of undiagnosed ADRD within a clinical cohort prone to underdiagnosis. The heterogeneous predictors across severity strata underscore the importance of aligning prediction with disease severity, given the distinct clinical needs that attend ADRD progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":53226,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","volume":"18 4","pages":"e70512"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13673010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The electronic health record (EHR) offers a promising resource to improve recognition of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD), yet existing approaches have been developed within cohorts that underrepresent individuals prone to underdiagnosis and do not differentiate disease severity.

Methods: We applied a validated computational phenotype to identify probable ADRD (p-ADRD) and its severity within a random sample of 5000 individuals aged ≥65 years who presented to one of nine emergency departments in the Yale New Haven Health System (2014 to 2022). The dichotomous outcome was undiagnosed ADRD, assigned to those meeting criteria for p-ADRD but lacking validated diagnostic codes. We applied logistic regression with elastic net regularization to predict undiagnosed status for the overall cohort and within each severity stratum, assessing performance using 10-fold cross-validation.

Results: Of 1358 individuals with p-ADRD (mean age 86.7 years, standard deviation 7.4), 934 (68.8%) were undiagnosed. The overall model discriminated undiagnosed ADRD with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83 to 0.87). The severity-stratified models achieved AUROC of 0.80 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.83) for mild and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.94) for moderate to severe disease. Although the predictors of undiagnosed status differed by severity, fall-related injury was protective against underdiagnosis within each stratum.

Discussion: We developed and validated predictive models using structured EHR elements, which demonstrated robust discrimination of undiagnosed ADRD within a clinical cohort prone to underdiagnosis. The heterogeneous predictors across severity strata underscore the importance of aligning prediction with disease severity, given the distinct clinical needs that attend ADRD progression.

在急诊科未确诊的阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆的预测模型的开发和验证。
电子健康记录(EHR)为提高对阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)的认识提供了一个有希望的资源,然而现有的方法是在队列中开发的,这些队列中不充分代表易于诊断不足的个体,并且不能区分疾病的严重程度。方法:我们应用一种经过验证的计算表型来识别可能的ADRD (p-ADRD)及其严重程度,随机抽样5000名年龄≥65岁的患者,这些患者在2014年至2022年期间在耶鲁大学纽黑文卫生系统的9个急诊科之一就诊。二分类结果为未确诊的ADRD,分配给符合p-ADRD标准但缺乏有效诊断代码的患者。我们应用弹性网络正则化的逻辑回归来预测整个队列和每个严重程度层的未诊断状态,并使用10倍交叉验证评估性能。结果:1358例p-ADRD患者(平均年龄86.7岁,标准差7.4)中,934例(68.8%)未确诊。整体模型对未确诊的ADRD的识别,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.85(95%置信区间[CI] 0.83 ~ 0.87)。严重程度分层模型的AUROC在轻度疾病为0.80 (95% CI 0.77 ~ 0.83),在中度至重度疾病为0.91 (95% CI 0.88 ~ 0.94)。虽然未诊断状态的预测因子因严重程度而异,但在每个阶层中,跌倒相关损伤对未诊断状态具有保护作用。讨论:我们开发并验证了使用结构化电子病历元素的预测模型,该模型显示了在易于诊断不足的临床队列中对未诊断的ADRD的强大辨别能力。严重程度不同的预测因素强调了将预测与疾病严重程度相结合的重要性,因为ADRD的进展有不同的临床需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
7.50%
发文量
101
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring (DADM) is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal from the Alzheimer''s Association® that will publish new research that reports the discovery, development and validation of instruments, technologies, algorithms, and innovative processes. Papers will cover a range of topics interested in the early and accurate detection of individuals with memory complaints and/or among asymptomatic individuals at elevated risk for various forms of memory disorders. The expectation for published papers will be to translate fundamental knowledge about the neurobiology of the disease into practical reports that describe both the conceptual and methodological aspects of the submitted scientific inquiry. Published topics will explore the development of biomarkers, surrogate markers, and conceptual/methodological challenges. Publication priority will be given to papers that 1) describe putative surrogate markers that accurately track disease progression, 2) biomarkers that fulfill international regulatory requirements, 3) reports from large, well-characterized population-based cohorts that comprise the heterogeneity and diversity of asymptomatic individuals and 4) algorithmic development that considers multi-marker arrays (e.g., integrated-omics, genetics, biofluids, imaging, etc.) and advanced computational analytics and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书