The Impact of a Self-Distanced Writing Intervention on Social Anxiety Among College Freshmen: The Mediating Roles of Cognitive Reappraisal and Self-Compassion.

IF 4.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychology Research and Behavior Management Pub Date : 2026-10-12 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S640605
Shuoan Yang, BoKai Yang
{"title":"The Impact of a Self-Distanced Writing Intervention on Social Anxiety Among College Freshmen: The Mediating Roles of Cognitive Reappraisal and Self-Compassion.","authors":"Shuoan Yang, BoKai Yang","doi":"10.2147/PRBM.S640605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social anxiety is common during the transition to university, creating a need for brief, accessible psychological interventions. Traditional expressive writing has shown benefits for anxiety, but its emotionally immersive first-person format may be less suitable for some students. Self-distanced writing offers an alternative by encouraging reflection from an observer-like perspective.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We examined whether a four-week self-distanced writing intervention reduced social anxiety more than traditional expressive writing or neutral writing, and whether cognitive reappraisal and self-compassion would mediate any observed advantage.</p><p><strong>Participants and methods: </strong>In a three-arm, assessor-blind randomized controlled trial, 187 first-year students with Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale-Self-Report (LSAS-SR) scores ≥38 were randomly assigned to self-distanced writing (SDW; n=63), traditional expressive writing (EW; n=62), or neutral writing (NW; n=62). Each group completed eight supervised 20-minute sessions over four weeks. We assessed social anxiety, cognitive reappraisal, and self-compassion at baseline, one week after the intervention, and at the one-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Social anxiety decreased over time, with different trajectories across groups. SDW did not differ significantly from EW at the one-week post-intervention assessment, but at the one-month follow-up it showed greater reductions in social anxiety than both EW and NW. Increased self-compassion helped explain the difference between SDW and EW, whereas cognitive reappraisal did not. Neither process helped explain the difference between SDW and NW.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A four-week SDW intervention was associated with greater reductions in social anxiety at the one-month follow-up. The findings suggest that self-compassion may be particularly relevant to how SDW differs from traditional expressive writing. Longer follow-up and further evaluation in university settings are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":"19 ","pages":"640605"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13675966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S640605","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social anxiety is common during the transition to university, creating a need for brief, accessible psychological interventions. Traditional expressive writing has shown benefits for anxiety, but its emotionally immersive first-person format may be less suitable for some students. Self-distanced writing offers an alternative by encouraging reflection from an observer-like perspective.

Purpose: We examined whether a four-week self-distanced writing intervention reduced social anxiety more than traditional expressive writing or neutral writing, and whether cognitive reappraisal and self-compassion would mediate any observed advantage.

Participants and methods: In a three-arm, assessor-blind randomized controlled trial, 187 first-year students with Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale-Self-Report (LSAS-SR) scores ≥38 were randomly assigned to self-distanced writing (SDW; n=63), traditional expressive writing (EW; n=62), or neutral writing (NW; n=62). Each group completed eight supervised 20-minute sessions over four weeks. We assessed social anxiety, cognitive reappraisal, and self-compassion at baseline, one week after the intervention, and at the one-month follow-up.

Results: Social anxiety decreased over time, with different trajectories across groups. SDW did not differ significantly from EW at the one-week post-intervention assessment, but at the one-month follow-up it showed greater reductions in social anxiety than both EW and NW. Increased self-compassion helped explain the difference between SDW and EW, whereas cognitive reappraisal did not. Neither process helped explain the difference between SDW and NW.

Conclusion: A four-week SDW intervention was associated with greater reductions in social anxiety at the one-month follow-up. The findings suggest that self-compassion may be particularly relevant to how SDW differs from traditional expressive writing. Longer follow-up and further evaluation in university settings are needed.

自我距离写作干预对大学新生社交焦虑的影响:认知重评和自我同情的中介作用
背景:社交焦虑在向大学过渡的过程中很常见,因此需要简单易懂的心理干预。传统的表达性写作已经显示出对焦虑的好处,但其情感沉浸式的第一人称格式可能不太适合一些学生。自我距离写作通过鼓励从观察者的角度进行反思,提供了另一种选择。目的:我们研究了为期四周的自我距离写作干预是否比传统的表达性写作或中性写作更能减少社交焦虑,以及认知重评和自我同情是否会介导任何观察到的优势。参与者和方法:在一项三组、评估盲随机对照试验中,187名Liebowitz社交焦虑量表-自我报告(LSAS-SR)得分≥38分的一年级学生被随机分配到自我距离写作(SDW, n=63)、传统表达性写作(EW, n=62)和中性写作(NW, n=62)组。每组在四周内完成八次有监督的20分钟训练。我们在基线、干预后一周和一个月的随访中评估了社交焦虑、认知重评价和自我同情。结果:社交焦虑随着时间的推移而减少,在不同的群体中有不同的轨迹。在干预后一周的评估中,SDW与EW没有显著差异,但在一个月的随访中,它显示出比EW和NW更大的社交焦虑减少。自我同情的增加有助于解释SDW和EW之间的差异,而认知重评则没有。这两个过程都不能解释SDW和NW之间的差异。结论:在一个月的随访中,为期四周的SDW干预与社交焦虑的更大减少有关。研究结果表明,自我同情可能与SDW与传统表达性写作的区别特别相关。需要在大学环境中进行更长时间的跟踪和进一步的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
341
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书