Cell wall polymer interactions, rather than polysaccharide fine structure, underlie recalcitrance in energy cane varieties.

IF 6.5 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Adriana Grandis, Débora Pagliuso, Marina C M Martins, Anne Elizabeth Harman-Ware, Nicholas C Carpita, Marcos S Buckeridge
{"title":"Cell wall polymer interactions, rather than polysaccharide fine structure, underlie recalcitrance in energy cane varieties.","authors":"Adriana Grandis, Débora Pagliuso, Marina C M Martins, Anne Elizabeth Harman-Ware, Nicholas C Carpita, Marcos S Buckeridge","doi":"10.1093/jxb/erag494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Second-generation bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass has driven the development of high-fiber sugarcane varieties known as energy canes, which combine high tillering, high biomass accumulation, lower sucrose, and improved agronomic performance. However, energy canes have been reported to be more recalcitrant to enzymatic saccharification. We compared biomass and cell wall composition, non-cellulosic polysaccharide extractability, and saccharification efficiency in two energy cane varieties, Vertix V2 and Vertix V3, and sugarcane. Sugarcane contained three times as much sucrose and less fiber than energy canes. After removing soluble sugars from the biomass, reduced digestibility became evident in the two energy cane varieties, particularly in V2. Saccharification increased with alkali and doubled after acidic sodium chlorite treatments. Although the main polysaccharides and linkage structures were broadly conserved across genotypes, minor changes were observed in their relative abundance and extractability. Glucuronoarabinoxylans (GAX) were the predominant wall polysaccharides (72%), while pectins [homogalacturonan (HG) and rhamnogalacturonan I (RG-I), each 1%], arabinan side-groups (4-6%), glucomannans (1%), and xyloglucan (2-4%) occurred in smaller proportions. Sugarcane contained higher abundances of xyloglucan, β-glucan, glucomannan, and arabinan, whereas energy canes had higher HG and RG-I. Chlorite oxidation solubilized GAX and RG-I, indicating that polymers are associated with phenylpropanoids and contribute to wall recalcitrance. The contrasting saccharification behavior of the sugarcane and energy cane varieties examined here appears to arise not from major changes in polysaccharide fine structure, but from differences in biomass allocation, phenylpropanoid abundance, extractability, and molecular interactions among cellulose, matrix polysaccharides, and phenylpropanoids within the cell wall. Understanding these properties in relation to enzyme-mediated disassembly is fundamental to accessing grass walls and improving biomass saccharification.</p>","PeriodicalId":15820,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erag494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Second-generation bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass has driven the development of high-fiber sugarcane varieties known as energy canes, which combine high tillering, high biomass accumulation, lower sucrose, and improved agronomic performance. However, energy canes have been reported to be more recalcitrant to enzymatic saccharification. We compared biomass and cell wall composition, non-cellulosic polysaccharide extractability, and saccharification efficiency in two energy cane varieties, Vertix V2 and Vertix V3, and sugarcane. Sugarcane contained three times as much sucrose and less fiber than energy canes. After removing soluble sugars from the biomass, reduced digestibility became evident in the two energy cane varieties, particularly in V2. Saccharification increased with alkali and doubled after acidic sodium chlorite treatments. Although the main polysaccharides and linkage structures were broadly conserved across genotypes, minor changes were observed in their relative abundance and extractability. Glucuronoarabinoxylans (GAX) were the predominant wall polysaccharides (72%), while pectins [homogalacturonan (HG) and rhamnogalacturonan I (RG-I), each 1%], arabinan side-groups (4-6%), glucomannans (1%), and xyloglucan (2-4%) occurred in smaller proportions. Sugarcane contained higher abundances of xyloglucan, β-glucan, glucomannan, and arabinan, whereas energy canes had higher HG and RG-I. Chlorite oxidation solubilized GAX and RG-I, indicating that polymers are associated with phenylpropanoids and contribute to wall recalcitrance. The contrasting saccharification behavior of the sugarcane and energy cane varieties examined here appears to arise not from major changes in polysaccharide fine structure, but from differences in biomass allocation, phenylpropanoid abundance, extractability, and molecular interactions among cellulose, matrix polysaccharides, and phenylpropanoids within the cell wall. Understanding these properties in relation to enzyme-mediated disassembly is fundamental to accessing grass walls and improving biomass saccharification.

细胞壁聚合物的相互作用,而不是多糖的精细结构,是能源甘蔗品种抗性的基础。
从木质纤维素生物质中生产第二代生物乙醇推动了高纤维甘蔗品种的发展,这些品种被称为能量甘蔗,它们结合了高分蘖、高生物量积累、低蔗糖和提高农艺性能。然而,据报道,能量甘蔗对酶糖化的抗性更强。我们比较了两个能源甘蔗品种(Vertix V2和Vertix V3)和甘蔗的生物量和细胞壁组成、非纤维素多糖提取率和糖化效率。甘蔗的蔗糖含量是能量甘蔗的三倍,而纤维含量却比能量甘蔗少。从生物质中去除可溶性糖后,两个能源甘蔗品种的消化率明显降低,特别是在V2中。加碱后糖化率提高,酸性亚氯酸钠处理后糖化率提高一倍。虽然主要的多糖和连锁结构在基因型中广泛保守,但它们的相对丰度和可提取性却发生了微小的变化。葡萄糖醛酸阿拉伯糖木聚糖(GAX)是主要的壁多糖(72%),果胶[均半乳葡聚糖(HG)和鼠李糖半乳葡聚糖I (RG-I)各占1%],阿拉伯糖侧基团(4-6%),葡甘露聚糖(1%)和木葡聚糖(2-4%)的比例较小。甘蔗具有较高的木葡聚糖、β-葡聚糖、葡甘露聚糖和阿拉伯聚糖丰度,而能量甘蔗具有较高的HG和RG-I丰度。绿泥石氧化可溶解GAX和RG-I,表明聚合物与苯基丙烷相关,并有助于壁阻性。本文研究的甘蔗和能源甘蔗品种的糖化行为的差异似乎不是由于多糖精细结构的主要变化,而是由于生物量分配、苯丙素丰度、可提取性以及纤维素、基质多糖和苯丙素在细胞壁内的分子相互作用的差异。了解这些与酶介导的分解有关的特性是获取草壁和改善生物质糖化的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Botany
Journal of Experimental Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
450
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Botany publishes high-quality primary research and review papers in the plant sciences. These papers cover a range of disciplines from molecular and cellular physiology and biochemistry through whole plant physiology to community physiology. Full-length primary papers should contribute to our understanding of how plants develop and function, and should provide new insights into biological processes. The journal will not publish purely descriptive papers or papers that report a well-known process in a species in which the process has not been identified previously. Articles should be concise and generally limited to 10 printed pages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书