Cihan Durmuşkaya, Mustafa Abdül Metin Dinçer, Onur Metin, Akın Özdemir
{"title":"Repatriation, identity, and organisational adaptation: a case study on reverse brain drain and socio-psychological drivers in Turkey's energy sector.","authors":"Cihan Durmuşkaya, Mustafa Abdül Metin Dinçer, Onur Metin, Akın Özdemir","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1802059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the post-return experiences of engineers who completed postgraduate education abroad under a state scholarship carrying a service-or-repay bond and returned to a strategic public organisation in Turkey, the Case Company (CC): graduates either serve the institution for twice the funded period or reimburse the full cost of their training. We characterise this arrangement as scholarship-bound return migration and direct attention to what the bond cannot secure: integration after return. The research focuses on their integration into local work processes, organisational adaptation dynamics, knowledge transfer mechanisms, and institutional logic conflicts. In this context, the research question of the study has been formulated as follows: How do the socio-psychological experiences of scholarship-funded engineers evolve after their return, as they adapt to their home organisation and its competing institutional logics? Using a qualitative methodology, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 engineers who returned under this scholarship-bound arrangement and analysed the data using inductive and deductive content analysis in MAXQDA. Findings indicate that participants experienced reality shock due to inadequate orientation, alongside professional dissatisfaction stemming from expertise-role mismatches. However, socio-cultural factors-specifically a 'debt of gratitude' and strong family ties-prove pivotal in retention. Analysis through an institutional logics lens revealed persistent tensions between CC's public-bureaucratic operating logic and the global market logic that engineers had internalised during their studies abroad. While existing literature focuses on macro-level migration factors, this study addresses micro-level organisational adaptation and cognitive dissonance within strategic sectors through institutional logic analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1802059"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13671976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1802059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines the post-return experiences of engineers who completed postgraduate education abroad under a state scholarship carrying a service-or-repay bond and returned to a strategic public organisation in Turkey, the Case Company (CC): graduates either serve the institution for twice the funded period or reimburse the full cost of their training. We characterise this arrangement as scholarship-bound return migration and direct attention to what the bond cannot secure: integration after return. The research focuses on their integration into local work processes, organisational adaptation dynamics, knowledge transfer mechanisms, and institutional logic conflicts. In this context, the research question of the study has been formulated as follows: How do the socio-psychological experiences of scholarship-funded engineers evolve after their return, as they adapt to their home organisation and its competing institutional logics? Using a qualitative methodology, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 engineers who returned under this scholarship-bound arrangement and analysed the data using inductive and deductive content analysis in MAXQDA. Findings indicate that participants experienced reality shock due to inadequate orientation, alongside professional dissatisfaction stemming from expertise-role mismatches. However, socio-cultural factors-specifically a 'debt of gratitude' and strong family ties-prove pivotal in retention. Analysis through an institutional logics lens revealed persistent tensions between CC's public-bureaucratic operating logic and the global market logic that engineers had internalised during their studies abroad. While existing literature focuses on macro-level migration factors, this study addresses micro-level organisational adaptation and cognitive dissonance within strategic sectors through institutional logic analysis.
本研究考察了在国家奖学金下完成国外研究生教育的工程师回国后的经历,这些工程师持有服务或偿还债券,并返回土耳其的一家战略性公共组织Case Company (CC):毕业生要么为该机构服务两倍的资助期,要么偿还全部培训费用。我们将这种安排描述为奖学金约束的回归移民,并直接关注债券无法确保的内容:回归后的融合。研究的重点是他们融入当地工作流程、组织适应动态、知识转移机制和制度逻辑冲突。在此背景下,本研究的研究问题被制定如下:获得奖学金的工程师在回国后,随着他们适应家乡组织及其竞争的制度逻辑,他们的社会心理体验是如何演变的?采用定性的方法,我们对12名在此奖学金安排下回国的工程师进行了半结构化的访谈,并在MAXQDA中使用归纳和演绎内容分析来分析数据。研究结果表明,由于不充分的定位,参与者经历了现实冲击,以及专业知识-角色不匹配引起的专业不满。然而,社会文化因素——特别是“感恩之债”和牢固的家庭关系——被证明是留住人才的关键。通过制度逻辑的分析揭示了CC的公共官僚运作逻辑和工程师在国外学习期间内化的全球市场逻辑之间持续存在的紧张关系。虽然现有文献侧重于宏观层面的迁移因素,但本研究通过制度逻辑分析解决了微观层面的战略部门组织适应和认知失调问题。
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.