S. Ellen Macdonald, Anne C. S. McIntosh, Selena Schut, Samuel Bartels, Seung-Il Lee, Elvira Baisheva, Jeff Battigelli, Erin Bayne, Yves Bergeron, Mathieu Bouchard, Brendan Casey, Mats Dynesius, I. Tanya Handa, Joakim Hjältén, Kristoffer Hylander, Matti Koivula, Jari Kouki, Therese Löfroth, Asko Lõhmus, Anders Nielsen, Sonya Odsen, Manuela Panzacchi, Jaime Pinzon, Peter B. Reich, Pavel Shirokikh, Ekaterina Shorohova, Ilkka Vanha-Majamaa, Lisa Venier, Tim Work, Linhao Wu
{"title":"Biodiversity recovery is slow following clear-cut harvest of boreal forests","authors":"S. Ellen Macdonald, Anne C. S. McIntosh, Selena Schut, Samuel Bartels, Seung-Il Lee, Elvira Baisheva, Jeff Battigelli, Erin Bayne, Yves Bergeron, Mathieu Bouchard, Brendan Casey, Mats Dynesius, I. Tanya Handa, Joakim Hjältén, Kristoffer Hylander, Matti Koivula, Jari Kouki, Therese Löfroth, Asko Lõhmus, Anders Nielsen, Sonya Odsen, Manuela Panzacchi, Jaime Pinzon, Peter B. Reich, Pavel Shirokikh, Ekaterina Shorohova, Ilkka Vanha-Majamaa, Lisa Venier, Tim Work, Linhao Wu","doi":"10.1038/s41893-026-01868-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Boreal forests are important reservoirs of biodiversity, carbon and timber stocks. However, timber harvest can alter biodiversity in these forests without clear evidence on the duration needed for biotic groups to recover. Resilience of boreal forest biodiversity to clear-cut harvest was examined with a meta-analysis of 190 datasets from boreal and hemi-boreal forests of Europe/Russia and North America for arthropods, birds, small mammals, lichens, bryophytes and vascular plants. We modelled similarity of community composition between harvested and unharvested stands versus years post harvest. In approximately half of cases, predicted times for recovery to pre-harvest composition were ≤30 years. In other cases, recovery took much longer or had not occurred within the timeframe of our data; for example, in conifer forest: >100 years (bryophytes), >55 years (small mammals), ~95 years (lichens) and ~85 years (vascular plants). Saproxylic beetles showed no resilience within the 16 (conifer forest) or 29 (mixed forest) years post harvest for which we had data. Recovery generally took longer in conifer and mixed than in broadleaf forests, which always showed either resistance (bryophytes, vascular plants) or resilience with recovery within 12–25 years. Conserving biodiversity in boreal forests will require extended rotations, management for ‘old forest’ structural elements and areas protected from harvesting. Clear-cut timber harvest in boreal forests impacts local biodiversity; however, it is still unclear how quickly biotic groups rebound from such disturbances. This meta-analysis determines the resilience of biotic groups to clear-cut harvest across boreal forests of Europe/Russia and North America.","PeriodicalId":19056,"journal":{"name":"Nature Sustainability","volume":"9 10","pages":"1607-1617"},"PeriodicalIF":32.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-026-01868-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-026-01868-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Boreal forests are important reservoirs of biodiversity, carbon and timber stocks. However, timber harvest can alter biodiversity in these forests without clear evidence on the duration needed for biotic groups to recover. Resilience of boreal forest biodiversity to clear-cut harvest was examined with a meta-analysis of 190 datasets from boreal and hemi-boreal forests of Europe/Russia and North America for arthropods, birds, small mammals, lichens, bryophytes and vascular plants. We modelled similarity of community composition between harvested and unharvested stands versus years post harvest. In approximately half of cases, predicted times for recovery to pre-harvest composition were ≤30 years. In other cases, recovery took much longer or had not occurred within the timeframe of our data; for example, in conifer forest: >100 years (bryophytes), >55 years (small mammals), ~95 years (lichens) and ~85 years (vascular plants). Saproxylic beetles showed no resilience within the 16 (conifer forest) or 29 (mixed forest) years post harvest for which we had data. Recovery generally took longer in conifer and mixed than in broadleaf forests, which always showed either resistance (bryophytes, vascular plants) or resilience with recovery within 12–25 years. Conserving biodiversity in boreal forests will require extended rotations, management for ‘old forest’ structural elements and areas protected from harvesting. Clear-cut timber harvest in boreal forests impacts local biodiversity; however, it is still unclear how quickly biotic groups rebound from such disturbances. This meta-analysis determines the resilience of biotic groups to clear-cut harvest across boreal forests of Europe/Russia and North America.
期刊介绍:
Nature Sustainability aims to facilitate cross-disciplinary dialogues and bring together research fields that contribute to understanding how we organize our lives in a finite world and the impacts of our actions.
Nature Sustainability will not only publish fundamental research but also significant investigations into policies and solutions for ensuring human well-being now and in the future.Its ultimate goal is to address the greatest challenges of our time.