Impact of range scale factor and baseline biases on gravity field estimation: analysis and validation with GRACE follow-on data and simulations

IF 4.7 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Zitong Zhu,Vitali Müller,Changqing Wang,Yihao Yan,Heng Yin,Jiangjun Ran,Haoming Yan
{"title":"Impact of range scale factor and baseline biases on gravity field estimation: analysis and validation with GRACE follow-on data and simulations","authors":"Zitong Zhu,Vitali Müller,Changqing Wang,Yihao Yan,Heng Yin,Jiangjun Ran,Haoming Yan","doi":"10.1007/s00190-026-02123-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract GRACE/GRACE-FO missions recover gravity field from orbits observed by GPS and variations in inter-satellite distances obtained by the inter-satellite ranging systems. Compared to GRACE, GRACE-FO is also equipped with a laser ranging interferometer (LRI), a more precise inter-satellite ranging technology and the preferred choice for future gravity missions. While the majority of studies predominantly focus on stochastic errors, this research highlights the critical role of non-stochastic biases, specifically the range scale factor for the K-Band ranging (KBR) and LRI data, and baseline biases in GPS observations, i.e., offsets over the ~200 km separation. The effects of range scale factor and baseline biases on the gravity field spherical harmonic coefficients (SHCs) are evaluated through simplified bias models (SBM). We demonstrate that baseline biases exert an influence on the SHCs in a manner analogous to that of the range scale factor. At low SH degrees (2–8), range scale factor and baseline biases impact SHCs approximately proportional to the static gravity field coefficients. The SBM agrees well with error-free simulations, but deviations appear at higher degrees (8–60) when background model errors are included and scale biases are below 1 ppm. Additionally, the effectiveness of the SBM is validated using real GRACE-FO data. A strong correspondence was observed between the scale factor corrections and the C 20 relative errors, which provides a practical basis for error budgeting in future missions. These findings indicate the significant impact of scale factors and baseline biases on gravity missions, which can be effectively evaluated using the SBM presented here.","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-026-02123-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract GRACE/GRACE-FO missions recover gravity field from orbits observed by GPS and variations in inter-satellite distances obtained by the inter-satellite ranging systems. Compared to GRACE, GRACE-FO is also equipped with a laser ranging interferometer (LRI), a more precise inter-satellite ranging technology and the preferred choice for future gravity missions. While the majority of studies predominantly focus on stochastic errors, this research highlights the critical role of non-stochastic biases, specifically the range scale factor for the K-Band ranging (KBR) and LRI data, and baseline biases in GPS observations, i.e., offsets over the ~200 km separation. The effects of range scale factor and baseline biases on the gravity field spherical harmonic coefficients (SHCs) are evaluated through simplified bias models (SBM). We demonstrate that baseline biases exert an influence on the SHCs in a manner analogous to that of the range scale factor. At low SH degrees (2–8), range scale factor and baseline biases impact SHCs approximately proportional to the static gravity field coefficients. The SBM agrees well with error-free simulations, but deviations appear at higher degrees (8–60) when background model errors are included and scale biases are below 1 ppm. Additionally, the effectiveness of the SBM is validated using real GRACE-FO data. A strong correspondence was observed between the scale factor corrections and the C 20 relative errors, which provides a practical basis for error budgeting in future missions. These findings indicate the significant impact of scale factors and baseline biases on gravity missions, which can be effectively evaluated using the SBM presented here.
距离尺度因子和基线偏差对重力场估计的影响:GRACE后续数据和模拟的分析和验证
GRACE/GRACE- fo任务根据GPS观测到的轨道和星间测距系统获得的星间距离变化恢复重力场。与GRACE相比,GRACE- fo还配备了激光测距干涉仪(LRI),这是一种更精确的卫星间测距技术,也是未来重力任务的首选。虽然大多数研究主要集中在随机误差上,但本研究强调了非随机偏差的关键作用,特别是k波段测距(KBR)和LRI数据的距离尺度因子,以及GPS观测中的基线偏差,即~200 km距离上的偏移。通过简化偏差模型(SBM)分析了距离尺度因子和基线偏差对重力场球谐系数(SHCs)的影响。我们证明,基线偏差以类似于距离尺度因子的方式对SHCs施加影响。在低SH度(2-8)时,距离尺度因子和基线偏差对SHCs的影响与静态重力场系数大致成正比。SBM与无误差模拟很好地吻合,但当包括背景模式误差和尺度偏差低于1ppm时,偏差出现在更高的程度(8-60)。此外,使用GRACE-FO真实数据验证了SBM的有效性。观察到比额系数修正与c20相对误差之间有很强的对应关系,这为今后特派团编制误差预算提供了实际依据。这些发现表明尺度因子和基线偏差对重力任务有显著影响,可以使用本文提出的SBM进行有效评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书