Songtao Mei, Shiyang Li, Stijn H. Peeters, Qi Zhang, Kai Wang, Nynke Hofstra, Heike Schmitt
{"title":"Fluoroquinolones are primary drivers of antibiotic resistance selection risk for priority pathogens in Chinese rivers","authors":"Songtao Mei, Shiyang Li, Stijn H. Peeters, Qi Zhang, Kai Wang, Nynke Hofstra, Heike Schmitt","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2026.127149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Antibiotic pollution in the rivers can lead to environmental antibiotic resistance (AR) selection, yet selection risks from complex antibiotic mixtures in the rivers remain poorly understood. In this study, we coupled the GloWPa-Antibiotics C1 model, a process-based model simulating emissions and concentrations of 33 antibiotics, with a systematic three-level risk assessment framework to quantify AR selection risk across China's rivers. In 2020, 2303 tonnes of antibiotics were estimated to enter rivers, predominantly from livestock (91.7%), mainly via direct discharge of faecal waste from pigs, broilers, beef cattle and laying hens. At the bacterial community level, fluoroquinolones and sulfonamides exhibited the highest potential AR selection risk; for WHO priority pathogens specifically, fluoroquinolones posed a high potential selection risk. Mixtures of antibiotics amplified this potential selection risk compared with individual compounds. By advancing from deterministic screening to a novel probabilistic strain-based assessment, we estimated that a median of 26.7% of China’s riverine <em>Escherichia coli</em> load resides in rivers where fluoroquinolone mixture concentrations exceed their strain-specific minimal selective concentration, mainly concentrated in the most populous and agriculturally intensive basins, Haihe, Huaihe and Yangtze River Basins, where high pathogen density intersects with elevated antibiotic concentrations. Across China's rivers, <em>Escherichia coli</em> in 3.2% of river cells was persistently at risk, while a further 49.1% were conditionally at risk depending on the assessment factors chosen for quantifying AR selection risk. This study is the first to integrate process-based modelling with a systematic risk assessment framework for AR selection, offering critical insights for targeted monitoring and management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"309 ","pages":"Article 127149"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2027-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004313542601821X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Antibiotic pollution in the rivers can lead to environmental antibiotic resistance (AR) selection, yet selection risks from complex antibiotic mixtures in the rivers remain poorly understood. In this study, we coupled the GloWPa-Antibiotics C1 model, a process-based model simulating emissions and concentrations of 33 antibiotics, with a systematic three-level risk assessment framework to quantify AR selection risk across China's rivers. In 2020, 2303 tonnes of antibiotics were estimated to enter rivers, predominantly from livestock (91.7%), mainly via direct discharge of faecal waste from pigs, broilers, beef cattle and laying hens. At the bacterial community level, fluoroquinolones and sulfonamides exhibited the highest potential AR selection risk; for WHO priority pathogens specifically, fluoroquinolones posed a high potential selection risk. Mixtures of antibiotics amplified this potential selection risk compared with individual compounds. By advancing from deterministic screening to a novel probabilistic strain-based assessment, we estimated that a median of 26.7% of China’s riverine Escherichia coli load resides in rivers where fluoroquinolone mixture concentrations exceed their strain-specific minimal selective concentration, mainly concentrated in the most populous and agriculturally intensive basins, Haihe, Huaihe and Yangtze River Basins, where high pathogen density intersects with elevated antibiotic concentrations. Across China's rivers, Escherichia coli in 3.2% of river cells was persistently at risk, while a further 49.1% were conditionally at risk depending on the assessment factors chosen for quantifying AR selection risk. This study is the first to integrate process-based modelling with a systematic risk assessment framework for AR selection, offering critical insights for targeted monitoring and management.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.