Big Data for Small Streams: Leveraging a Coarse National Model to Enhance Fine‐Resolution Stream Temperature Predictions

IF 6.3 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
J. R. Barclay,L. E. Koenig,Y. Fan,X. Jia,A. Appling
{"title":"Big Data for Small Streams: Leveraging a Coarse National Model to Enhance Fine‐Resolution Stream Temperature Predictions","authors":"J. R. Barclay,L. E. Koenig,Y. Fan,X. Jia,A. Appling","doi":"10.1029/2025wr041874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Predictive stream temperature models are commonly used to address spatial and temporal gaps in observational data because stream temperature information is essential for environmental management decisions. National models capture broad patterns driven by climate, topography, and seasonality, but often lack the spatial resolution to simulate fine‐scale variation in groundwater discharge, riparian shading, or tributary inflows. In contrast, watershed models may simulate finer‐resolution patterns but miss regional drivers or be limited by scarcity of observations. To generate watershed‐extent, fine‐resolution stream temperature predictions, we developed 18 multiscale machine‐learning models that leverage (a) a broad‐extent, coarse‐resolution stream temperature model and (b) finer‐resolution observations and predictor data. The coarse‐resolution model simulates daily stream temperature across the conterminous United States on the National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric (13.7 km median reach length; 865,364 km total). The fine‐resolution models simulate daily stream temperature on the National Hydrography Dataset Plus version 2 (1.5 km median; 5,192,808 km total). We compared multiscale models to seven purely broad‐ (national) or watershed‐extent models, testing them in eight watersheds (436–985 km 2 ) with differing hydrologic settings and under realistic data availability scenarios. Especially when observations within a watershed were scarce, multiscale models generated more accurate predictions than national or watershed‐specific models. A recurrent graph convolution neural network pretrained on coarse predictions and fine‐tuned on watershed‐specific observations was most accurate across watersheds and data scenarios. These results highlight that leveraging both coarse, national results and watershed‐specific data can increase model accuracies, particularly when observations within a watershed are spatially or temporally limited.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2025wr041874","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Predictive stream temperature models are commonly used to address spatial and temporal gaps in observational data because stream temperature information is essential for environmental management decisions. National models capture broad patterns driven by climate, topography, and seasonality, but often lack the spatial resolution to simulate fine‐scale variation in groundwater discharge, riparian shading, or tributary inflows. In contrast, watershed models may simulate finer‐resolution patterns but miss regional drivers or be limited by scarcity of observations. To generate watershed‐extent, fine‐resolution stream temperature predictions, we developed 18 multiscale machine‐learning models that leverage (a) a broad‐extent, coarse‐resolution stream temperature model and (b) finer‐resolution observations and predictor data. The coarse‐resolution model simulates daily stream temperature across the conterminous United States on the National Hydrologic Geospatial Fabric (13.7 km median reach length; 865,364 km total). The fine‐resolution models simulate daily stream temperature on the National Hydrography Dataset Plus version 2 (1.5 km median; 5,192,808 km total). We compared multiscale models to seven purely broad‐ (national) or watershed‐extent models, testing them in eight watersheds (436–985 km 2 ) with differing hydrologic settings and under realistic data availability scenarios. Especially when observations within a watershed were scarce, multiscale models generated more accurate predictions than national or watershed‐specific models. A recurrent graph convolution neural network pretrained on coarse predictions and fine‐tuned on watershed‐specific observations was most accurate across watersheds and data scenarios. These results highlight that leveraging both coarse, national results and watershed‐specific data can increase model accuracies, particularly when observations within a watershed are spatially or temporally limited.
小溪的大数据:利用粗糙的国家模型来增强精细分辨率的河流温度预测
预测河流温度模型通常用于解决观测数据的时空差距,因为河流温度信息对环境管理决策至关重要。国家模式捕获由气候、地形和季节性驱动的广泛模式,但往往缺乏空间分辨率来模拟地下水流量、河岸遮阳或支流流入的细尺度变化。相比之下,流域模式可以模拟更精细分辨率的模式,但缺少区域驱动因素或受观测值缺乏的限制。为了生成流域范围、精细分辨率的河流温度预测,我们开发了18个多尺度机器学习模型,这些模型利用了(a)大范围、粗分辨率的河流温度模型和(b)精细分辨率的观测和预测数据。粗分辨率模型在国家水文地理空间结构(平均长度13.7公里,总长度865,364公里)上模拟了美国相邻地区的日溪流温度。精细分辨率模式在国家水文数据集Plus版本2上模拟每日溪流温度(中位数1.5公里;总计5,192,808公里)。我们将多尺度模型与7个纯宽(国家)或流域范围模型进行了比较,并在8个流域(436-985 km2)中进行了测试,这些流域具有不同的水文环境和现实的数据可用性情景。特别是当一个流域内的观测资料稀少时,多尺度模型产生的预测比国家或特定流域的模型更准确。循环图卷积神经网络对粗预测进行预训练,并对流域特定观测进行微调,在流域和数据场景中最准确。这些结果强调,利用粗糙的国家结果和流域特定数据可以提高模型的准确性,特别是当流域内的观测在空间或时间上受到限制时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书