Global and Regional Risk Factors for Vision Impairment in 2020 and Multi-decadal Trends 1990-2020: A Meta-Analysis and Visual Display Based on Prevalence Data From the Global Burden of Disease study and Vision Loss Expert Group.

IF 2.4
Michele Bottone, Jost Jonas, Jaimie Steinmetz, Tasanee Braithwaite, Robert Casson, Joshua Ehrlich, Hugh R Taylor, David Friedman, Nathan Congdon, John Kempen, Janet Leasher, Ningli Wang, Rohit Khanna, Tunde Peto, Joao M Furtado, Tien Y Wong, Mary E Hartnett, Maria V Cicinelli, Nina Tahhan, Van C Lansingh, Sophia Y Wang, Ian Tapply, Paul Briant, Theo Vos, Serge Resnikoff, Seth R Flaxman, Rupert R A Bourne
{"title":"Global and Regional Risk Factors for Vision Impairment in 2020 and Multi-decadal Trends 1990-2020: A Meta-Analysis and Visual Display Based on Prevalence Data From the Global Burden of Disease study and Vision Loss Expert Group.","authors":"Michele Bottone, Jost Jonas, Jaimie Steinmetz, Tasanee Braithwaite, Robert Casson, Joshua Ehrlich, Hugh R Taylor, David Friedman, Nathan Congdon, John Kempen, Janet Leasher, Ningli Wang, Rohit Khanna, Tunde Peto, Joao M Furtado, Tien Y Wong, Mary E Hartnett, Maria V Cicinelli, Nina Tahhan, Van C Lansingh, Sophia Y Wang, Ian Tapply, Paul Briant, Theo Vos, Serge Resnikoff, Seth R Flaxman, Rupert R A Bourne","doi":"10.1007/s44402-026-00208-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate global and regional risk factors for blindness and vision impairment pertaining to all geographical locations between 1990 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>(1) Twenty-four covariates were selected with a potential link to vision impairment from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) Covariates database as predictive factors. (2) From these, the linear association was investigated, with crude and age-standardised prevalence estimates of blindness and distance and near vision impairment in 2020 by using data for the whole population, sex and 5-year age groups, and by stratifying severity through mild, moderate, severe and total impairment. (3) Analysis investigated whether percentage rates of change in risk factors were associated with rates of change in prevalence in 1990-2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For adults (50+ years), for crude and age-standardised vision loss prevalence estimates for the year 2020, a significant negative association of smoking prevalence was found initially for all persons and for each sex, which appears to be due to ecological confounding and became a positive association using more granular regional and age group data. Maternal care and immunisation, sanitation proportion, Health Access and Quality Index and Socio-demographic Index were other significant age-standardised negative associations. Ophthalmologists/million population had a weak but significant protective effect, and positive associations were found for pollution (outdoor and indoor), stronger for greater vision impairment severities. Years in education per capita were weakly, negatively associated with vision loss prevalence, yet zero education proportion had a stronger but positive association for both sexes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed associations at population level globally, which appear to be stable over decades. In addition, the study quantified the contribution of epidemiologically-based risk factors to vision loss at a GBD super-regional level, which is novel. This opens useful avenues for targeted intervention by policymakers. For example, reduction in sex inequity in blindness rates over 30 years has been positively associated with reducing overall prevalence of blindness.</p>","PeriodicalId":520731,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","volume":" ","pages":"1262-1271"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13694339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44402-026-00208-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate global and regional risk factors for blindness and vision impairment pertaining to all geographical locations between 1990 and 2020.

Methods: (1) Twenty-four covariates were selected with a potential link to vision impairment from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) Covariates database as predictive factors. (2) From these, the linear association was investigated, with crude and age-standardised prevalence estimates of blindness and distance and near vision impairment in 2020 by using data for the whole population, sex and 5-year age groups, and by stratifying severity through mild, moderate, severe and total impairment. (3) Analysis investigated whether percentage rates of change in risk factors were associated with rates of change in prevalence in 1990-2020.

Results: For adults (50+ years), for crude and age-standardised vision loss prevalence estimates for the year 2020, a significant negative association of smoking prevalence was found initially for all persons and for each sex, which appears to be due to ecological confounding and became a positive association using more granular regional and age group data. Maternal care and immunisation, sanitation proportion, Health Access and Quality Index and Socio-demographic Index were other significant age-standardised negative associations. Ophthalmologists/million population had a weak but significant protective effect, and positive associations were found for pollution (outdoor and indoor), stronger for greater vision impairment severities. Years in education per capita were weakly, negatively associated with vision loss prevalence, yet zero education proportion had a stronger but positive association for both sexes.

Conclusions: This study confirmed associations at population level globally, which appear to be stable over decades. In addition, the study quantified the contribution of epidemiologically-based risk factors to vision loss at a GBD super-regional level, which is novel. This opens useful avenues for targeted intervention by policymakers. For example, reduction in sex inequity in blindness rates over 30 years has been positively associated with reducing overall prevalence of blindness.

2020年视力损害的全球和区域危险因素以及1990-2020年的多年趋势:基于全球疾病负担研究和视力丧失专家组患病率数据的meta分析和视觉显示
目的:调查1990年至2020年间所有地理位置的失明和视力障碍的全球和区域危险因素。方法:(1)从全球疾病负担研究(GBD)协变量数据库中选择24个与视力损害有潜在联系的协变量作为预测因素。(2)在此基础上,利用全国人口、性别和5岁年龄组的数据,并按轻度、中度、重度和完全损害对严重程度进行分层,对2020年失明和远近视力障碍的粗略和年龄标准化患病率进行线性关联研究。(3)分析了1990-2020年危险因素的百分比变化率是否与患病率变化率相关。结果:对于成年人(50岁以上),对于粗糙的和年龄标准化的2020年视力丧失患病率估计,最初发现所有人和每个性别的吸烟率都存在显著的负相关,这似乎是由于生态混杂,使用更精细的区域和年龄组数据后变成了正相关。产妇保健和免疫接种、卫生设施比例、保健机会和质量指数以及社会人口指数是其他显著的年龄标准化负相关。眼科医生/百万人口具有弱但显著的保护作用,与室外和室内污染呈正相关,与视力损害严重程度越强。人均受教育年限与视力下降患病率呈弱负相关,而零受教育比例对两性都有较强的正相关。结论:这项研究证实了全球人口水平上的关联,这种关联在几十年内似乎是稳定的。此外,该研究在GBD的超区域水平上量化了基于流行病学的危险因素对视力丧失的贡献,这是新颖的。这为决策者有针对性的干预开辟了有用的途径。例如,30年来盲率性别不平等的减少与总体失明患病率的降低呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书