One Dose versus Three Doses of Benzathine Penicillin G in Early Syphilis in People Living with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Martin Cevallos-Cueva, Sümeyye Aktaş, Luiza Fenalte Streher, Ana Clara Felix De Farias Santos, Lorena Oliveira Fonseca, Ayşe Deniz Gökengin, Henry J C De Vries
{"title":"One Dose versus Three Doses of Benzathine Penicillin G in Early Syphilis in People Living with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Martin Cevallos-Cueva, Sümeyye Aktaş, Luiza Fenalte Streher, Ana Clara Felix De Farias Santos, Lorena Oliveira Fonseca, Ayşe Deniz Gökengin, Henry J C De Vries","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the current recommendations of the CDC and IUSTI, controversy persists regarding the adequate dose and duration of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) for early syphilis in people living with HIV (PLWH). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception to October 2025 for studies comparing a single-dose versus a 3-dose BPG regimen in PLWH with early syphilis. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome included serologic cure, defined as a ≥4-fold (2-dilution) decline from baseline in antibody titers measured by nontreponemal (lipoidal antigen) tests, including rapid plasma reagin (RPR) or venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) tests, at 6 and 12 months. A total of 8 studies, including 2randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 6observational studies, were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference in serologic cure between a single-dose versus 3-dose BPG at 6months (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.07; P = 0.95) or 12 months (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.04; P = 0.46). Overall, our pooled results did not show a significant difference between single-dose and 3-dose BPG. However, our study did not evaluate selected high-risk subgroups, particularly individuals with advanced immunosuppression or untreated HIV infection. Thus, a potential benefit of enhanced therapy in these specific populations cannot be entirely ruled out, underscoring the need for future RCTs focused on these subgroups and designed to stratify or adjust for key disease-modifying factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the current recommendations of the CDC and IUSTI, controversy persists regarding the adequate dose and duration of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) for early syphilis in people living with HIV (PLWH). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception to October 2025 for studies comparing a single-dose versus a 3-dose BPG regimen in PLWH with early syphilis. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome included serologic cure, defined as a ≥4-fold (2-dilution) decline from baseline in antibody titers measured by nontreponemal (lipoidal antigen) tests, including rapid plasma reagin (RPR) or venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) tests, at 6 and 12 months. A total of 8 studies, including 2randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 6observational studies, were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference in serologic cure between a single-dose versus 3-dose BPG at 6months (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.07; P = 0.95) or 12 months (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.04; P = 0.46). Overall, our pooled results did not show a significant difference between single-dose and 3-dose BPG. However, our study did not evaluate selected high-risk subgroups, particularly individuals with advanced immunosuppression or untreated HIV infection. Thus, a potential benefit of enhanced therapy in these specific populations cannot be entirely ruled out, underscoring the need for future RCTs focused on these subgroups and designed to stratify or adjust for key disease-modifying factors.

1剂与3剂苄星青霉素G治疗HIV感染者早期梅毒:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually transmitted diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.10%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association​, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书