Beyond avoidance: negative lying flat and emotional distress among Chinese youth in a 10-day daily diary study.

IF 4.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Haoqian Li, Bei Zhang, Yingli Luo, Jin Zou, Mingtao Chen, Fankang Li, Zheng Zhang, Jian Sun
{"title":"Beyond avoidance: negative lying flat and emotional distress among Chinese youth in a 10-day daily diary study.","authors":"Haoqian Li, Bei Zhang, Yingli Luo, Jin Zou, Mingtao Chen, Fankang Li, Zheng Zhang, Jian Sun","doi":"10.1186/s40359-026-05590-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Negative lying flat (NLF) is a culturally salient form of withdrawal among Chinese youth. In this study, NLF was operationalized as diminished goal pursuit and reduced willingness to expend effort. We examined whether daily NLF is distinguishable from experiential avoidance (EA) and how both are temporally related to anxiety and depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 201 Chinese university students (34.8% male; Mage = 21.04 years, SD = 1.40) who provided 1,863 valid observations across 10 scheduled weekday assessments over two weeks. Three DSEM models examined NLF and EA (Model A), anxiety with both withdrawal constructs (Model B), and depressive symptoms with both withdrawal constructs (Model C), while adjusting between-person components for age and gender. Corresponding NLF and EA paths were compared using posterior contrasts. Calendar-day sensitivity analyses represented the two weekend days as systematically missing within a 12-day calendar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model A showed no reliable within-person cross-lagged associations between NLF and EA (NLF→EA: β = 0.030, 95% CrI [-0.046, 0.099]; EA→NLF: β = 0.053, 95% CrI [-0.010, 0.115]). In the joint emotional-distress models, anxiety predicted subsequent NLF (β = 0.113, 95% CrI [0.050, 0.184]) and NLF predicted subsequent anxiety (β = 0.082, 95% CrI [0.023, 0.153]); depressive symptoms predicted subsequent NLF (β = 0.085, 95% CrI [0.015, 0.152]) and NLF predicted subsequent depressive symptoms (β = 0.075, 95% CrI [0.006, 0.134]). Corresponding EA paths included zero, and posterior contrasts did not establish differences between corresponding NLF and EA paths. Calendar-day estimates were similar in direction and magnitude, but the NLF-to-anxiety and NLF-to-depressive-symptoms credible intervals marginally included zero.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary models identified reciprocal short-lag associations between NLF and emotional distress that were not observed for EA. Taken together, these findings support continued investigation of NLF as a goal-and-effort withdrawal process in daily emotional adjustment, without establishing stronger effects than EA.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13676002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05590-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Negative lying flat (NLF) is a culturally salient form of withdrawal among Chinese youth. In this study, NLF was operationalized as diminished goal pursuit and reduced willingness to expend effort. We examined whether daily NLF is distinguishable from experiential avoidance (EA) and how both are temporally related to anxiety and depressive symptoms.

Methods: Participants were 201 Chinese university students (34.8% male; Mage = 21.04 years, SD = 1.40) who provided 1,863 valid observations across 10 scheduled weekday assessments over two weeks. Three DSEM models examined NLF and EA (Model A), anxiety with both withdrawal constructs (Model B), and depressive symptoms with both withdrawal constructs (Model C), while adjusting between-person components for age and gender. Corresponding NLF and EA paths were compared using posterior contrasts. Calendar-day sensitivity analyses represented the two weekend days as systematically missing within a 12-day calendar.

Results: Model A showed no reliable within-person cross-lagged associations between NLF and EA (NLF→EA: β = 0.030, 95% CrI [-0.046, 0.099]; EA→NLF: β = 0.053, 95% CrI [-0.010, 0.115]). In the joint emotional-distress models, anxiety predicted subsequent NLF (β = 0.113, 95% CrI [0.050, 0.184]) and NLF predicted subsequent anxiety (β = 0.082, 95% CrI [0.023, 0.153]); depressive symptoms predicted subsequent NLF (β = 0.085, 95% CrI [0.015, 0.152]) and NLF predicted subsequent depressive symptoms (β = 0.075, 95% CrI [0.006, 0.134]). Corresponding EA paths included zero, and posterior contrasts did not establish differences between corresponding NLF and EA paths. Calendar-day estimates were similar in direction and magnitude, but the NLF-to-anxiety and NLF-to-depressive-symptoms credible intervals marginally included zero.

Conclusions: Primary models identified reciprocal short-lag associations between NLF and emotional distress that were not observed for EA. Taken together, these findings support continued investigation of NLF as a goal-and-effort withdrawal process in daily emotional adjustment, without establishing stronger effects than EA.

在一项为期10天的每日日记研究中,中国年轻人的消极平躺和情绪困扰。
背景:消极平躺(NLF)是中国青少年的一种文化突出的退缩形式。在本研究中,NLF表现为目标追求的减少和付出努力的意愿的降低。我们研究了日常NLF是否与经验回避(EA)有区别,以及两者在时间上如何与焦虑和抑郁症状相关。方法:参与者为201名中国大学生(34.8%为男性,年龄21.04岁,SD = 1.40),他们在两周内的10个预定工作日评估中提供了1,863个有效观察结果。三个DSEM模型检查了NLF和EA(模型A),两种戒断结构的焦虑(模型B)和两种戒断结构的抑郁症状(模型C),同时调整了年龄和性别的人际成分。采用后验对比比较相应的NLF和EA路径。日历日敏感性分析表明,在12天的日历中,有系统地缺少两个周末。结果:模型A显示NLF与EA之间没有可靠的人内交叉滞后关联(NLF→EA: β = 0.030, 95% CrI [-0.046, 0.099]; EA→NLF: β = 0.053, 95% CrI[-0.010, 0.115])。在联合情绪困扰模型中,焦虑预测随后的NLF (β = 0.113, 95% CrI [0.050, 0.184]), NLF预测随后的焦虑(β = 0.082, 95% CrI [0.023, 0.153]);抑郁症状预测随后的NLF (β = 0.085, 95% CrI [0.015, 0.152]), NLF预测随后的抑郁症状(β = 0.075, 95% CrI[0.006, 0.134])。相应的EA路径包括零,后验对比没有建立相应的NLF和EA路径之间的差异。日历日的估计在方向和量级上相似,但nlf -焦虑和nlf -抑郁症状的可信区间几乎为零。结论:初步模型确定了NLF和情绪困扰之间的相互短滞后关联,而EA没有观察到这一点。综上所述,这些发现支持了NLF作为日常情绪调整中目标和努力退出过程的继续研究,而没有建立比EA更强的效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书