Baseline characteristics and bone mineral density changes associated with lower fracture risk in osteoporosis: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Mariya Nedkova, Irina Momcheva, Tsvetanka Petranova, Zguro Batalov
{"title":"Baseline characteristics and bone mineral density changes associated with lower fracture risk in osteoporosis: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Mariya Nedkova, Irina Momcheva, Tsvetanka Petranova, Zguro Batalov","doi":"10.1007/s00296-026-06330-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Late diagnosis of osteoporosis with already existing low-energy fractures, often incorrect reassessment of fracture risk and suboptimal therapy is associated with significant unmet needs in high-risk patients. Predictors for fracture risk assessment are the basis of the long-term strategy for monitoring, stratifying patients and treating osteoporosis. To evaluate whether changes in total bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and BMD of the femoral neck over 36 months were associated with transition to a lower estimated fracture risk category after adjustment for baseline patient characteristics and treatment type. Retrospective observational cohort study including 298 participants with postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis with and without low-energy fractures undergoing antiresorptive therapy. Data were followed for a period of 3 years and were collected at baseline and at a 1-year follow-up period. Multivariable logistic regression identified denosumab therapy (OR = 4.21, p = 0.003), percentage gain in BMD of the femoral neck (OR = 1.05, p = 0.004), and postmenopausal osteoporosis (OR = 9.37, p = 0.009) as independent predictors of lower fracture risk transition at 36 months. Transition rates were higher with denosumab than bisphosphonates (79.5% vs. 29.6%) and in postmenopausal vs. senile osteoporosis (61.6% vs. 5.7%). The reduced model showed good discrimination (AUC = 0.803), remaining stable on 10-fold cross-validation (AUC = 0.780). Given existing gaps in risk stratification and management of high risk patients, these findings highlight the clinical value of targeting BMD of the femoral neck improvements, optimizing therapeutic choices, and individualizing treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"46 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-026-06330-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Late diagnosis of osteoporosis with already existing low-energy fractures, often incorrect reassessment of fracture risk and suboptimal therapy is associated with significant unmet needs in high-risk patients. Predictors for fracture risk assessment are the basis of the long-term strategy for monitoring, stratifying patients and treating osteoporosis. To evaluate whether changes in total bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and BMD of the femoral neck over 36 months were associated with transition to a lower estimated fracture risk category after adjustment for baseline patient characteristics and treatment type. Retrospective observational cohort study including 298 participants with postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis with and without low-energy fractures undergoing antiresorptive therapy. Data were followed for a period of 3 years and were collected at baseline and at a 1-year follow-up period. Multivariable logistic regression identified denosumab therapy (OR = 4.21, p = 0.003), percentage gain in BMD of the femoral neck (OR = 1.05, p = 0.004), and postmenopausal osteoporosis (OR = 9.37, p = 0.009) as independent predictors of lower fracture risk transition at 36 months. Transition rates were higher with denosumab than bisphosphonates (79.5% vs. 29.6%) and in postmenopausal vs. senile osteoporosis (61.6% vs. 5.7%). The reduced model showed good discrimination (AUC = 0.803), remaining stable on 10-fold cross-validation (AUC = 0.780). Given existing gaps in risk stratification and management of high risk patients, these findings highlight the clinical value of targeting BMD of the femoral neck improvements, optimizing therapeutic choices, and individualizing treatment.

基线特征和骨密度变化与骨质疏松症骨折风险降低相关:一项回顾性队列研究
骨质疏松症合并已经存在的低能性骨折的晚期诊断、对骨折风险的不正确的重新评估和不理想的治疗与高危患者显著的未满足需求相关。骨折风险评估的预测因子是监测、分层患者和治疗骨质疏松症的长期策略的基础。在调整基线患者特征和治疗类型后,评估36个月内腰椎和股骨颈总骨密度(BMD)的变化是否与向较低骨折风险类别过渡有关。回顾性观察队列研究包括298名接受抗吸收治疗的绝经后和老年性骨质疏松伴或不伴低能性骨折患者。数据随访3年,并在基线和1年随访期间收集。多变量logistic回归发现,denosumab治疗(OR = 4.21, p = 0.003)、股骨颈骨密度百分比增加(OR = 1.05, p = 0.004)和绝经后骨质疏松症(OR = 9.37, p = 0.009)是36个月骨折风险转移降低的独立预测因素。denosumab组的过渡率高于双膦酸盐组(79.5% vs. 29.6%),绝经后骨质疏松症组(61.6% vs. 5.7%)。简化后的模型具有良好的判别性(AUC = 0.803),在10倍交叉验证(AUC = 0.780)下保持稳定。鉴于目前在高危患者的风险分层和管理方面存在差距,这些研究结果强调了靶向改善股骨颈骨密度、优化治疗选择和个体化治疗的临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书