Learning dispositions as a lens for teaching socioscientific issues: Attitudes of university biology students towards animal experimentation.

IF 2.8 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2026-10-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0358949
Jacqueline Dischereit, Susanne Bögeholz
{"title":"Learning dispositions as a lens for teaching socioscientific issues: Attitudes of university biology students towards animal experimentation.","authors":"Jacqueline Dischereit, Susanne Bögeholz","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0358949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attitudes towards socioscientific issues (SSIs) represent crucial learning dispositions, as they can influence the students' willingness to engage with SSIs. Animal experimentation is a particularly contentious SSI, with attitudes ranging from rejection to acceptance. They are influenced by external factors (e.g., research context, test animal) and internal factors (e.g., knowledge, ethical aspects). Understanding these attitudes is essential for fostering reflective engagement with SSIs in higher education. This study (N = 503) examines self-reported attitudes of pre-service teacher biology students and non-pre-service teacher biology students towards three contexts: animal experimentation with nonhuman primates, animal experimentation with other test animals, and behavioural research with nonhuman primates. It also explores the internal factors underlying these attitudes. Students' attitudes differed across contexts: animal experimentation with nonhuman primates was viewed most critically, while behavioural research was perceived most favourably. Pre-service teacher students expressed more ambivalent and negative attitudes than non-pre-service teacher students. Regarding internal factors, a clear explanatory pattern emerged: \"pro\" attitudes were mainly explained by knowledge, \"ambivalent\" attitudes by conditions (e.g., the necessity of the research), and \"contra\" attitudes by ethical aspects. Pre-service teacher students consistently explained their attitudes with more references to knowledge than non-pre-service teacher students. These findings highlight the need for evidence-based integration of learning dispositions into science (teacher) higher education that explicitly addresses the SSI animal experimentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"21 10","pages":"e0358949"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13674764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358949","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attitudes towards socioscientific issues (SSIs) represent crucial learning dispositions, as they can influence the students' willingness to engage with SSIs. Animal experimentation is a particularly contentious SSI, with attitudes ranging from rejection to acceptance. They are influenced by external factors (e.g., research context, test animal) and internal factors (e.g., knowledge, ethical aspects). Understanding these attitudes is essential for fostering reflective engagement with SSIs in higher education. This study (N = 503) examines self-reported attitudes of pre-service teacher biology students and non-pre-service teacher biology students towards three contexts: animal experimentation with nonhuman primates, animal experimentation with other test animals, and behavioural research with nonhuman primates. It also explores the internal factors underlying these attitudes. Students' attitudes differed across contexts: animal experimentation with nonhuman primates was viewed most critically, while behavioural research was perceived most favourably. Pre-service teacher students expressed more ambivalent and negative attitudes than non-pre-service teacher students. Regarding internal factors, a clear explanatory pattern emerged: "pro" attitudes were mainly explained by knowledge, "ambivalent" attitudes by conditions (e.g., the necessity of the research), and "contra" attitudes by ethical aspects. Pre-service teacher students consistently explained their attitudes with more references to knowledge than non-pre-service teacher students. These findings highlight the need for evidence-based integration of learning dispositions into science (teacher) higher education that explicitly addresses the SSI animal experimentation.

作为社会科学问题教学镜头的学习倾向:大学生物系学生对动物实验的态度。
对社会科学问题的态度代表了重要的学习倾向,因为它们可以影响学生参与社会科学问题的意愿。动物实验是一个特别有争议的SSI,人们的态度从拒绝到接受不等。它们受到外部因素(如研究背景、试验动物)和内部因素(如知识、伦理方面)的影响。理解这些态度对于在高等教育中培养对ssi的反思参与至关重要。本研究(N = 503)考察了职前生物学教师学生和非职前生物学教师学生对三种情境的自我报告态度:用非人类灵长类动物进行动物实验、用其他实验动物进行动物实验和用非人类灵长类动物进行行为研究。它还探讨了这些态度背后的内在因素。学生的态度在不同的背景下有所不同:非人类灵长类动物实验被认为是最批判的,而行为研究被认为是最有利的。职前师范生比非职前师范生表现出更多的矛盾和消极态度。在内部因素方面,出现了清晰的解释模式:“赞成”态度主要由知识解释,“矛盾”态度主要由条件(如研究的必要性)解释,“反对”态度主要由伦理方面解释。与非职前教师学生相比,职前教师学生在解释态度时更多地提到知识。这些发现强调了将学习倾向纳入科学(教师)高等教育的必要性,明确解决了SSI动物实验问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书