Cochlear Implantation and Cognitive Function in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christi A Joyce, Kelly Zhang, Joost J A Stultiens, Kelsey A Kidd, Alexandra E Quimby
{"title":"Cochlear Implantation and Cognitive Function in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Christi A Joyce, Kelly Zhang, Joost J A Stultiens, Kelsey A Kidd, Alexandra E Quimby","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000005085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess for changes in cognitive function in the first year following cochlear implantation in adult implant recipients.</p><p><strong>Database reviewed: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and CINAHL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies that assessed cognition in adult cochlear implant recipients. Included studies were English-language publications reporting objective cognitive testing scores both before and a minimum of 6 months after cochlear implantation in adults with postlingual hearing loss. Interventional studies, cohorts, case-controls, and case series with more than 5 patients were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Within-subjects random-effects meta-analyses were performed using the DerSimonian-Laird method. Pooled mean differences in cognitive test scores pre- versus postcochlear implantation were calculated for cognitive tests reported by more than 3 studies. Pooled standardized mean differences were calculated, including all reported cognitive tests across all studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty eligible studies were identified, including a total of 798 cochlear implant recipients. Fifteen separate cognitive tests or testing batteries were applied at a median of 12 months postoperatively (range, 6 to 48 mo). The Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) was the most frequently applied test (6 studies), followed by the MoCA (4 studies). Meta-analysis of mean differences showed no significant effect of cochlear implantation on MMSE score (pooled mean difference, 0.63 [95% CI: -1.02-2.28]), and a small but significant effect of cochlear implantation on MoCA score (pooled mean difference, 1.38 [95% CI: 0.33-2.42]). Considering all cognitive tests, there was a small but significant improvement in cognitive testing scores following cochlear implantation (pooled standardized mean difference 0.32 [95% CI: 0.19-0.44]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cochlear implantation in adults is associated with small but significant improvements in cognitive testing scores on at least some tests. Further research is needed to assess whether these findings translate to a reduction in dementia risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000005085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess for changes in cognitive function in the first year following cochlear implantation in adult implant recipients.

Database reviewed: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and CINAHL.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies that assessed cognition in adult cochlear implant recipients. Included studies were English-language publications reporting objective cognitive testing scores both before and a minimum of 6 months after cochlear implantation in adults with postlingual hearing loss. Interventional studies, cohorts, case-controls, and case series with more than 5 patients were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Within-subjects random-effects meta-analyses were performed using the DerSimonian-Laird method. Pooled mean differences in cognitive test scores pre- versus postcochlear implantation were calculated for cognitive tests reported by more than 3 studies. Pooled standardized mean differences were calculated, including all reported cognitive tests across all studies.

Results: Twenty eligible studies were identified, including a total of 798 cochlear implant recipients. Fifteen separate cognitive tests or testing batteries were applied at a median of 12 months postoperatively (range, 6 to 48 mo). The Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) was the most frequently applied test (6 studies), followed by the MoCA (4 studies). Meta-analysis of mean differences showed no significant effect of cochlear implantation on MMSE score (pooled mean difference, 0.63 [95% CI: -1.02-2.28]), and a small but significant effect of cochlear implantation on MoCA score (pooled mean difference, 1.38 [95% CI: 0.33-2.42]). Considering all cognitive tests, there was a small but significant improvement in cognitive testing scores following cochlear implantation (pooled standardized mean difference 0.32 [95% CI: 0.19-0.44]).

Conclusions: Cochlear implantation in adults is associated with small but significant improvements in cognitive testing scores on at least some tests. Further research is needed to assess whether these findings translate to a reduction in dementia risk.

成人人工耳蜗植入与认知功能:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:评价成人人工耳蜗植入术后第一年认知功能的变化。数据库综述:MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, PsycINFO,和CINAHL。方法:进行全面的文献检索,以确定评估成人人工耳蜗受者认知能力的研究。纳入的研究是英语出版物,报告了患有语后听力损失的成人人工耳蜗植入前和植入后至少6个月的客观认知测试分数。5例以上患者的介入研究、队列、病例对照和病例系列均符合条件。两位审稿人独立筛选研究并提取数据。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量和偏倚风险。采用dersimonan - laird方法进行受试者随机效应荟萃分析。对超过3项研究报告的认知测试计算耳蜗植入前和植入后认知测试得分的综合平均差异。计算合并的标准化平均差异,包括所有研究中所有报告的认知测试。结果:共纳入20项符合条件的研究,包括798名人工耳蜗受者。术后中位12个月(6至48个月)进行15项单独的认知测试或测试电池。最小精神状态测试(MMSE)是最常用的测试(6项研究),其次是MoCA(4项研究)。平均差异荟萃分析显示,人工耳蜗植入对MMSE评分无显著影响(合并平均差为0.63 [95% CI: -1.02-2.28]),人工耳蜗植入对MoCA评分的影响虽小但显著(合并平均差为1.38 [95% CI: 0.33-2.42])。考虑到所有的认知测试,人工耳蜗植入后认知测试得分有微小但显著的改善(合并标准化平均差0.32 [95% CI: 0.19-0.44])。结论:成人人工耳蜗植入与至少在某些测试中认知测试分数的微小但显著的改善有关。需要进一步的研究来评估这些发现是否转化为痴呆症风险的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书