Diagnostic Performance of CD4 T-Cell Count and CD4/CD8 Ratio for Identifying HIV-Related Posterior Segment Disease: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Hiromasa Hirai, Aki Nakajima, Daiki Kuraoka, Yutaro Mizusawa, Hiroki Tsujinaka, Tomo Nishi, Satoru Kase
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of CD4 T-Cell Count and CD4/CD8 Ratio for Identifying HIV-Related Posterior Segment Disease: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.","authors":"Hiromasa Hirai, Aki Nakajima, Daiki Kuraoka, Yutaro Mizusawa, Hiroki Tsujinaka, Tomo Nishi, Satoru Kase","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2026.2742505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of CD4 T-cell count and CD4/CD8 ratio for identifying HIV-related posterior segment disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 53 patients infected with HIV who first visited the ophthalmology department of Nara Medical University between January 2014 and December 2025. CD4 T-cell count and CD4/CD8 ratio were analyzed for their association with HIV-related posterior segment disease. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare the discriminatory ability of these markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HIV-related posterior segment disease was identified in 13 of 53 patients (25%). Diagnoses included cytomegalovirus retinitis (<i>n</i> = 5), acute retinal necrosis (<i>n</i> = 1), and HIV microvasculopathy (<i>n</i> = 7). In univariate analysis, lower CD4 count, lower CD4/CD8 ratio, absence of antiretroviral therapy, and active cytomegalovirus infection were associated with posterior segment disease. In multivariable analysis, the CD4 count remained associated with posterior segment disease (odds ratio 0.58 per 50 cells/μL increase; 95% CI 0.33-0.99), whereas the CD4/CD8 ratio was not. ROC analysis showed a numerically higher area under the curve for CD4 count (0.81) than for CD4/CD8 ratio (0.74), although the difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.27). A CD4 threshold of ≤100 cells/μL yielded a sensitivity of 92.3% and specificity of 75.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CD4 T-cell count showed numerically higher discriminatory performance than the CD4/CD8 ratio, although the difference was not statistically significant. A CD4 threshold of ≤100 cells/μL showed high sensitivity and may represent an exploratory threshold.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2026.2742505","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of CD4 T-cell count and CD4/CD8 ratio for identifying HIV-related posterior segment disease.

Methods: This retrospective study included 53 patients infected with HIV who first visited the ophthalmology department of Nara Medical University between January 2014 and December 2025. CD4 T-cell count and CD4/CD8 ratio were analyzed for their association with HIV-related posterior segment disease. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare the discriminatory ability of these markers.

Results: HIV-related posterior segment disease was identified in 13 of 53 patients (25%). Diagnoses included cytomegalovirus retinitis (n = 5), acute retinal necrosis (n = 1), and HIV microvasculopathy (n = 7). In univariate analysis, lower CD4 count, lower CD4/CD8 ratio, absence of antiretroviral therapy, and active cytomegalovirus infection were associated with posterior segment disease. In multivariable analysis, the CD4 count remained associated with posterior segment disease (odds ratio 0.58 per 50 cells/μL increase; 95% CI 0.33-0.99), whereas the CD4/CD8 ratio was not. ROC analysis showed a numerically higher area under the curve for CD4 count (0.81) than for CD4/CD8 ratio (0.74), although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.27). A CD4 threshold of ≤100 cells/μL yielded a sensitivity of 92.3% and specificity of 75.0%.

Conclusion: The CD4 T-cell count showed numerically higher discriminatory performance than the CD4/CD8 ratio, although the difference was not statistically significant. A CD4 threshold of ≤100 cells/μL showed high sensitivity and may represent an exploratory threshold.

CD4 t细胞计数和CD4/CD8比值对hiv相关后段疾病的诊断价值:一项回顾性单中心研究
目的:评价CD4 t细胞计数和CD4/CD8比值对hiv相关后段疾病的诊断价值。方法:回顾性研究2014年1月至2025年12月在奈良医科大学眼科就诊的53例HIV感染患者。分析CD4 t细胞计数和CD4/CD8比值与hiv相关后段疾病的相关性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析比较这些标记的区分能力。结果:53例患者中有13例(25%)发现hiv相关后段疾病。诊断包括巨细胞病毒性视网膜炎(n = 5)、急性视网膜坏死(n = 1)和HIV微血管病变(n = 7)。在单因素分析中,较低的CD4计数、较低的CD4/CD8比值、缺乏抗逆转录病毒治疗和活跃的巨细胞病毒感染与后段疾病相关。在多变量分析中,CD4计数仍然与后段疾病相关(比值比0.58 / 50个细胞/μL增加;95% CI 0.33-0.99),而CD4/CD8比值则无关。ROC分析显示CD4计数曲线下面积(0.81)高于CD4/CD8比值(0.74),尽管差异无统计学意义(p = 0.27)。CD4阈值≤100个细胞/μL敏感性为92.3%,特异性为75.0%。结论:CD4 t细胞计数在数值上比CD4/CD8比值具有更高的区别性,但差异无统计学意义。CD4阈值≤100个细胞/μL具有高灵敏度,可作为探索性阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
15.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ocular Immunology & Inflammation ranks 18 out of 59 in the Ophthalmology Category.Ocular Immunology and Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and vision scientists. Published bimonthly, the journal provides an international medium for basic and clinical research reports on the ocular inflammatory response and its control by the immune system. The journal publishes original research papers, case reports, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting abstracts, and invited editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书