Gregory J Tung, Louis Leslie, Natalie Murphy, Jonathan M Samet, Tianjing Li, Cathy J Bradley
{"title":"State Cannabis Policy and Public Health Research in the United States: Policy Disconnects and Research Gaps.","authors":"Gregory J Tung, Louis Leslie, Natalie Murphy, Jonathan M Samet, Tianjing Li, Cathy J Bradley","doi":"10.1146/annurev-publhealth-062325-064412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ongoing liberalization and legalization of cannabis policy in the United States have shifted the focus of policy discussions to how legal markets should be regulated to protect public health. We reviewed the scientific literature on cannabis legalization, mapped current state cannabis policies using the National Conference of State Legislatures cannabis policy domains, and conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed studies from 2015 to 2026 that measured specific cannabis policies and health or use outcomes. Across the 48 included studies, evidence was concentrated in licensing and business practices, nonmedical adult use regulations, medical program regulations, and local control. Our scoping review suggests that retail availability, outlet density, proximity, and local restrictions shape cannabis exposure and use. Evidence was limited for product regulations, taxes and revenue allocation, hemp/cannabidiol policies, justice system provisions, and public health/research policies. Future research should incorporate detailed policy coding, implementation measures, market data, surveillance data, and stronger researcher-policymaker linkages.</p>","PeriodicalId":50752,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-062325-064412","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ongoing liberalization and legalization of cannabis policy in the United States have shifted the focus of policy discussions to how legal markets should be regulated to protect public health. We reviewed the scientific literature on cannabis legalization, mapped current state cannabis policies using the National Conference of State Legislatures cannabis policy domains, and conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed studies from 2015 to 2026 that measured specific cannabis policies and health or use outcomes. Across the 48 included studies, evidence was concentrated in licensing and business practices, nonmedical adult use regulations, medical program regulations, and local control. Our scoping review suggests that retail availability, outlet density, proximity, and local restrictions shape cannabis exposure and use. Evidence was limited for product regulations, taxes and revenue allocation, hemp/cannabidiol policies, justice system provisions, and public health/research policies. Future research should incorporate detailed policy coding, implementation measures, market data, surveillance data, and stronger researcher-policymaker linkages.
期刊介绍:
The Annual Review of Public Health has been a trusted publication in the field since its inception in 1980. It provides comprehensive coverage of important advancements in various areas of public health, such as epidemiology, biostatistics, environmental health, occupational health, social environment and behavior, health services, as well as public health practice and policy.
In an effort to make the valuable research and information more accessible, the current volume has undergone a transformation. Previously, access to the articles was restricted, but now they are available to everyone through the Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open program. This open access approach ensures that the knowledge and insights shared in these articles can reach a wider audience. Additionally, all the published articles are licensed under a CC BY license, allowing users to freely use, distribute, and build upon the content, while giving appropriate credit to the original authors.