State Cannabis Policy and Public Health Research in the United States: Policy Disconnects and Research Gaps.

IF 17.2 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gregory J Tung, Louis Leslie, Natalie Murphy, Jonathan M Samet, Tianjing Li, Cathy J Bradley
{"title":"State Cannabis Policy and Public Health Research in the United States: Policy Disconnects and Research Gaps.","authors":"Gregory J Tung, Louis Leslie, Natalie Murphy, Jonathan M Samet, Tianjing Li, Cathy J Bradley","doi":"10.1146/annurev-publhealth-062325-064412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ongoing liberalization and legalization of cannabis policy in the United States have shifted the focus of policy discussions to how legal markets should be regulated to protect public health. We reviewed the scientific literature on cannabis legalization, mapped current state cannabis policies using the National Conference of State Legislatures cannabis policy domains, and conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed studies from 2015 to 2026 that measured specific cannabis policies and health or use outcomes. Across the 48 included studies, evidence was concentrated in licensing and business practices, nonmedical adult use regulations, medical program regulations, and local control. Our scoping review suggests that retail availability, outlet density, proximity, and local restrictions shape cannabis exposure and use. Evidence was limited for product regulations, taxes and revenue allocation, hemp/cannabidiol policies, justice system provisions, and public health/research policies. Future research should incorporate detailed policy coding, implementation measures, market data, surveillance data, and stronger researcher-policymaker linkages.</p>","PeriodicalId":50752,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-062325-064412","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ongoing liberalization and legalization of cannabis policy in the United States have shifted the focus of policy discussions to how legal markets should be regulated to protect public health. We reviewed the scientific literature on cannabis legalization, mapped current state cannabis policies using the National Conference of State Legislatures cannabis policy domains, and conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed studies from 2015 to 2026 that measured specific cannabis policies and health or use outcomes. Across the 48 included studies, evidence was concentrated in licensing and business practices, nonmedical adult use regulations, medical program regulations, and local control. Our scoping review suggests that retail availability, outlet density, proximity, and local restrictions shape cannabis exposure and use. Evidence was limited for product regulations, taxes and revenue allocation, hemp/cannabidiol policies, justice system provisions, and public health/research policies. Future research should incorporate detailed policy coding, implementation measures, market data, surveillance data, and stronger researcher-policymaker linkages.

美国各州大麻政策和公共卫生研究:政策脱节和研究差距。
美国正在实行的大麻政策自由化和合法化已将政策讨论的重点转移到如何管制合法市场以保护公众健康。我们审查了有关大麻合法化的科学文献,利用全国州议会大麻政策领域会议绘制了当前各州大麻政策的地图,并对2015年至2026年同行评议的研究进行了范围审查,这些研究衡量了具体的大麻政策和健康或使用结果。在纳入的48项研究中,证据集中在许可和商业惯例、非医疗成人使用规定、医疗项目规定和地方控制方面。我们的范围审查表明,零售可得性、网点密度、邻近性和当地限制影响大麻的暴露和使用。产品法规、税收和收入分配、大麻/大麻二酚政策、司法系统规定和公共卫生/研究政策方面的证据有限。未来的研究应纳入详细的政策编码、实施措施、市场数据、监测数据以及更强的研究者与决策者之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annual Review of Public Health
Annual Review of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
26.60
自引率
1.40%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Public Health has been a trusted publication in the field since its inception in 1980. It provides comprehensive coverage of important advancements in various areas of public health, such as epidemiology, biostatistics, environmental health, occupational health, social environment and behavior, health services, as well as public health practice and policy. In an effort to make the valuable research and information more accessible, the current volume has undergone a transformation. Previously, access to the articles was restricted, but now they are available to everyone through the Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open program. This open access approach ensures that the knowledge and insights shared in these articles can reach a wider audience. Additionally, all the published articles are licensed under a CC BY license, allowing users to freely use, distribute, and build upon the content, while giving appropriate credit to the original authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书