Antibiotic Stewardship in Cirrhosis: Current Recommendations and Clinical Challenges.

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Solaiman Ezzafzafi, Kimberly K I M Bot, Lucas H P Bernts, Reinier M van Hest, Alastair O'Brien, Michiel A van Agtmael, Jarne M van Hattem, Marten A Lantinga
{"title":"Antibiotic Stewardship in Cirrhosis: Current Recommendations and Clinical Challenges.","authors":"Solaiman Ezzafzafi, Kimberly K I M Bot, Lucas H P Bernts, Reinier M van Hest, Alastair O'Brien, Michiel A van Agtmael, Jarne M van Hattem, Marten A Lantinga","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bacterial infections are a major cause of mortality in cirrhosis, with antibiotic prophylaxis and empirical treatment embedded in international guidelines. However, the prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms and the epidemiology of infections have shifted considerably in recent decades. This review critically appraises the evidence underlying guideline recommendations on antibiotic prophylaxis for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and acute variceal bleeding in cirrhosis, and antimicrobial management in acute liver failure. The evidence-underlying current recommendations is limited and predates the current era of widespread antimicrobial resistance, challenging their applicability in current practice. Emerging evidence suggests that primary prophylaxis should be reconsidered, alternatives such as rifaximin warrant further evaluation against established fluoroquinolone regimens, and shorter antibiotic courses may be non-inferior to standard durations. New double-blind placebo-controlled, non-inferiority and Bayesian trials are needed to evaluate antibiotic regimens and microbiome- and barrier-directed interventions, supported by improved diagnostics, while minimising treatment duration, toxicity and selection for antimicrobial resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":"14 8","pages":"e70317"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13675727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70317","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bacterial infections are a major cause of mortality in cirrhosis, with antibiotic prophylaxis and empirical treatment embedded in international guidelines. However, the prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms and the epidemiology of infections have shifted considerably in recent decades. This review critically appraises the evidence underlying guideline recommendations on antibiotic prophylaxis for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and acute variceal bleeding in cirrhosis, and antimicrobial management in acute liver failure. The evidence-underlying current recommendations is limited and predates the current era of widespread antimicrobial resistance, challenging their applicability in current practice. Emerging evidence suggests that primary prophylaxis should be reconsidered, alternatives such as rifaximin warrant further evaluation against established fluoroquinolone regimens, and shorter antibiotic courses may be non-inferior to standard durations. New double-blind placebo-controlled, non-inferiority and Bayesian trials are needed to evaluate antibiotic regimens and microbiome- and barrier-directed interventions, supported by improved diagnostics, while minimising treatment duration, toxicity and selection for antimicrobial resistance.

肝硬化抗生素管理:当前建议和临床挑战。
细菌性感染是肝硬化患者死亡的主要原因,国际指南已将抗生素预防和经验性治疗纳入其中。然而,近几十年来,耐多药生物的流行和感染的流行病学发生了很大变化。本综述对肝硬化自发性细菌性腹膜炎和急性静脉曲张出血的抗生素预防以及急性肝功能衰竭的抗菌管理的指导建议的证据进行了批判性评价。基于证据的当前建议是有限的,并且早于当前广泛的抗菌素耐药性时代,挑战了它们在当前实践中的适用性。新出现的证据表明,应重新考虑初级预防,利福昔明等替代品值得进一步评估,以取代现有的氟喹诺酮类药物方案,较短的抗生素疗程可能不低于标准持续时间。需要新的双盲安慰剂对照、非劣效性和贝叶斯试验来评估抗生素方案以及微生物组和屏障导向的干预措施,在改进诊断的支持下,同时最大限度地减少治疗时间、毒性和对抗菌素耐药性的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
United European Gastroenterology Journal
United European Gastroenterology Journal GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
147
期刊介绍: United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal) is the official Journal of the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), a professional non-profit organisation combining all the leading European societies concerned with digestive disease. UEG’s member societies represent over 22,000 specialists working across medicine, surgery, paediatrics, GI oncology and endoscopy, which makes UEG a unique platform for collaboration and the exchange of knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书