Comparative evaluation of hyaluronic acid spray and low-level laser therapy on wound healing following gingivectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Nezahat Arzu Kayar, Ipek Ozgu, Fatma Koksel Babun, Ayşenur Çohadar Kaya, Deniz Ozel, Esra Bolat Gümüs, Mükerrem Hatipoglu
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of hyaluronic acid spray and low-level laser therapy on wound healing following gingivectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Nezahat Arzu Kayar, Ipek Ozgu, Fatma Koksel Babun, Ayşenur Çohadar Kaya, Deniz Ozel, Esra Bolat Gümüs, Mükerrem Hatipoglu","doi":"10.1007/s10103-026-05069-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gingivectomy wounds heal by secondary intention, prolonging recovery and postoperative discomfort; this randomized controlled trial compared low-level laser therapy and hyaluronic acid spray for early wound healing and postoperative pain after gingivectomy. Systemically healthy patients requiring gingivectomy were randomly allocated to receive either LLLT (940 nm diode laser, 3 W, 128.4 J/cm<sup>2</sup>, applied on days 0, 3, 5, and 7) or 0.04% high-molecular-weight HA spray (applied twice daily for 7 days). Wound epithelialization was quantified through Mira-2-Ton plaque-disclosing staining combined with digital planimetric analysis (ImageJ) at baseline and on postoperative days 3, 7, and 14. Secondary outcomes included gingival index (GI), full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS), probing pocket depth (PPD), and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. A total of 64 participants were enrolled and randomized (n = 32 per group). Both groups exhibited significant wound area reduction over time (p < 0.001). However, the HA spray group demonstrated significantly higher wound epithelialization percentages (percentage reduction from baseline in the non-epithelialized, disclosing-solution-stained wound surface area) than the LLLT group on days 3 (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.39), 7 (p < 0.001; d = 1.12), and 14 (p = 0.044; d = 0.73). The HA spray group also reported significantly lower VAS pain scores on days 1 and 3 (p < 0.05). Periodontal parameters improved significantly from baseline to week 6 in both groups (all p < 0.001), with no significant between-group differences at week 6 for GI (p = 0.999), FMBS (p = 0.843), or PPD (p = 0.718). HA spray yielded significantly accelerated re-epithelialization and superior early pain reduction compared to LLLT following gingivectomy, suggesting it may serve as a practical, patient-friendly adjunctive alternative to laser biostimulation in postoperative wound management. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT07034625.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13675292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-026-05069-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gingivectomy wounds heal by secondary intention, prolonging recovery and postoperative discomfort; this randomized controlled trial compared low-level laser therapy and hyaluronic acid spray for early wound healing and postoperative pain after gingivectomy. Systemically healthy patients requiring gingivectomy were randomly allocated to receive either LLLT (940 nm diode laser, 3 W, 128.4 J/cm2, applied on days 0, 3, 5, and 7) or 0.04% high-molecular-weight HA spray (applied twice daily for 7 days). Wound epithelialization was quantified through Mira-2-Ton plaque-disclosing staining combined with digital planimetric analysis (ImageJ) at baseline and on postoperative days 3, 7, and 14. Secondary outcomes included gingival index (GI), full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS), probing pocket depth (PPD), and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. A total of 64 participants were enrolled and randomized (n = 32 per group). Both groups exhibited significant wound area reduction over time (p < 0.001). However, the HA spray group demonstrated significantly higher wound epithelialization percentages (percentage reduction from baseline in the non-epithelialized, disclosing-solution-stained wound surface area) than the LLLT group on days 3 (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.39), 7 (p < 0.001; d = 1.12), and 14 (p = 0.044; d = 0.73). The HA spray group also reported significantly lower VAS pain scores on days 1 and 3 (p < 0.05). Periodontal parameters improved significantly from baseline to week 6 in both groups (all p < 0.001), with no significant between-group differences at week 6 for GI (p = 0.999), FMBS (p = 0.843), or PPD (p = 0.718). HA spray yielded significantly accelerated re-epithelialization and superior early pain reduction compared to LLLT following gingivectomy, suggesting it may serve as a practical, patient-friendly adjunctive alternative to laser biostimulation in postoperative wound management. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT07034625.

透明质酸喷雾和低水平激光治疗龈切除术后伤口愈合的比较评价:一项随机对照临床试验。
牙龈切除术创面的二次愈合,延长了恢复期和术后不适感;这项随机对照试验比较了低水平激光治疗和透明质酸喷雾对牙龈切除术后早期伤口愈合和术后疼痛的影响。需要牙龈切除术的全身健康患者被随机分配接受LLLT (940 nm二极管激光,3w, 128.4 J/cm2,于第0、3、5和7天使用)或0.04%高分子量HA喷雾(每天使用两次,连续7天)。在基线和术后第3,7和14天,通过Mira-2-Ton斑块显示染色结合数字平面分析(ImageJ)对伤口上皮化进行量化。次要结果包括牙龈指数(GI)、全口出血评分(FMBS)、探查袋深度(PPD)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分。共有64名参与者被纳入并随机分配(每组n = 32)。随着时间的推移,两组伤口面积均显著减少(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书