Comparative evaluation of hyaluronic acid spray and low-level laser therapy on wound healing following gingivectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of hyaluronic acid spray and low-level laser therapy on wound healing following gingivectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Nezahat Arzu Kayar, Ipek Ozgu, Fatma Koksel Babun, Ayşenur Çohadar Kaya, Deniz Ozel, Esra Bolat Gümüs, Mükerrem Hatipoglu","doi":"10.1007/s10103-026-05069-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gingivectomy wounds heal by secondary intention, prolonging recovery and postoperative discomfort; this randomized controlled trial compared low-level laser therapy and hyaluronic acid spray for early wound healing and postoperative pain after gingivectomy. Systemically healthy patients requiring gingivectomy were randomly allocated to receive either LLLT (940 nm diode laser, 3 W, 128.4 J/cm<sup>2</sup>, applied on days 0, 3, 5, and 7) or 0.04% high-molecular-weight HA spray (applied twice daily for 7 days). Wound epithelialization was quantified through Mira-2-Ton plaque-disclosing staining combined with digital planimetric analysis (ImageJ) at baseline and on postoperative days 3, 7, and 14. Secondary outcomes included gingival index (GI), full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS), probing pocket depth (PPD), and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. A total of 64 participants were enrolled and randomized (n = 32 per group). Both groups exhibited significant wound area reduction over time (p < 0.001). However, the HA spray group demonstrated significantly higher wound epithelialization percentages (percentage reduction from baseline in the non-epithelialized, disclosing-solution-stained wound surface area) than the LLLT group on days 3 (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.39), 7 (p < 0.001; d = 1.12), and 14 (p = 0.044; d = 0.73). The HA spray group also reported significantly lower VAS pain scores on days 1 and 3 (p < 0.05). Periodontal parameters improved significantly from baseline to week 6 in both groups (all p < 0.001), with no significant between-group differences at week 6 for GI (p = 0.999), FMBS (p = 0.843), or PPD (p = 0.718). HA spray yielded significantly accelerated re-epithelialization and superior early pain reduction compared to LLLT following gingivectomy, suggesting it may serve as a practical, patient-friendly adjunctive alternative to laser biostimulation in postoperative wound management. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT07034625.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13675292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-026-05069-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gingivectomy wounds heal by secondary intention, prolonging recovery and postoperative discomfort; this randomized controlled trial compared low-level laser therapy and hyaluronic acid spray for early wound healing and postoperative pain after gingivectomy. Systemically healthy patients requiring gingivectomy were randomly allocated to receive either LLLT (940 nm diode laser, 3 W, 128.4 J/cm2, applied on days 0, 3, 5, and 7) or 0.04% high-molecular-weight HA spray (applied twice daily for 7 days). Wound epithelialization was quantified through Mira-2-Ton plaque-disclosing staining combined with digital planimetric analysis (ImageJ) at baseline and on postoperative days 3, 7, and 14. Secondary outcomes included gingival index (GI), full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS), probing pocket depth (PPD), and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. A total of 64 participants were enrolled and randomized (n = 32 per group). Both groups exhibited significant wound area reduction over time (p < 0.001). However, the HA spray group demonstrated significantly higher wound epithelialization percentages (percentage reduction from baseline in the non-epithelialized, disclosing-solution-stained wound surface area) than the LLLT group on days 3 (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.39), 7 (p < 0.001; d = 1.12), and 14 (p = 0.044; d = 0.73). The HA spray group also reported significantly lower VAS pain scores on days 1 and 3 (p < 0.05). Periodontal parameters improved significantly from baseline to week 6 in both groups (all p < 0.001), with no significant between-group differences at week 6 for GI (p = 0.999), FMBS (p = 0.843), or PPD (p = 0.718). HA spray yielded significantly accelerated re-epithelialization and superior early pain reduction compared to LLLT following gingivectomy, suggesting it may serve as a practical, patient-friendly adjunctive alternative to laser biostimulation in postoperative wound management. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT07034625.
期刊介绍:
Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics.
The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.