Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of restless legs syndrome: A meta-analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Zhenchao Dong, Xiaojun Zhang, Jiaqin Zhang, JinTao Yuan, Hanbo Li, Weigang Tang, Wei Jiang, Wei Xu
{"title":"Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of restless legs syndrome: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Zhenchao Dong, Xiaojun Zhang, Jiaqin Zhang, JinTao Yuan, Hanbo Li, Weigang Tang, Wei Jiang, Wei Xu","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000051088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The benefit of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is uncertain. This study was performed to explore the therapeutic effect of rTMS in treating RLS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including PubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang database were searched from their inception to May 1, 2026. Eligible studies comparing rTMS with sham stimulation were included. Data were analyzed using Review Manager Version 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled analysis confirmed that rTMS could effectively reduce International RLS-Rating Scale (IRLS-RS) scores (mean difference [MD] = 6.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.44 -8.48, P < .00001) and Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) scores (MD = 4.80, 95% CI: 3.51-6.08, P < .00001) at different follow-up periods. Meanwhile, the overall pooled analysis confirmed that rTMS could effectively reduce IRLS-RS scores (MD = 7.79, 95% CI: 3.90-11.68, P < .0001) and PSQI scores (MD = 5.58, 95% CI: 3.81-7.35, P < .00001) in the subgroup analysis by RLS subtype. However, rTMS showed no significant effect on PSQI scores in primary RLS (MD = 1.86, 95% CI: -2.65-6.37, P = .42). In addition, the overall pooled analysis confirmed that both low-frequency and high-frequency rTMS could effectively reduce IRLS-RS scores (MD = 7.79, 95% CI: 3.90-11.68, P < .0001) and PSQI scores (MD = 5.58, 95% CI: 3.81-7.35, P < .00001). Finally, the overall pooled analysis confirmed that rTMS could not significantly reduce Hamilton anxiety scale and Hamilton depression scale scores in subgroup analyses of follow-up period, RLS subtype, or rTMS frequency (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>rTMS might alleviate core limb discomfort symptoms measured by IRLS-RS and improve sleep quality assessed by PSQI in patients with RLS. However, rTMS might not be effective in improving symptoms of anxiety and depression. To further confirm the conclusion, more large randomized controlled trials are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"105 42","pages":"e51088"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13681145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000051088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The benefit of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is uncertain. This study was performed to explore the therapeutic effect of rTMS in treating RLS.

Methods: Databases including PubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang database were searched from their inception to May 1, 2026. Eligible studies comparing rTMS with sham stimulation were included. Data were analyzed using Review Manager Version 5.3.

Results: Four studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled analysis confirmed that rTMS could effectively reduce International RLS-Rating Scale (IRLS-RS) scores (mean difference [MD] = 6.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.44 -8.48, P < .00001) and Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) scores (MD = 4.80, 95% CI: 3.51-6.08, P < .00001) at different follow-up periods. Meanwhile, the overall pooled analysis confirmed that rTMS could effectively reduce IRLS-RS scores (MD = 7.79, 95% CI: 3.90-11.68, P < .0001) and PSQI scores (MD = 5.58, 95% CI: 3.81-7.35, P < .00001) in the subgroup analysis by RLS subtype. However, rTMS showed no significant effect on PSQI scores in primary RLS (MD = 1.86, 95% CI: -2.65-6.37, P = .42). In addition, the overall pooled analysis confirmed that both low-frequency and high-frequency rTMS could effectively reduce IRLS-RS scores (MD = 7.79, 95% CI: 3.90-11.68, P < .0001) and PSQI scores (MD = 5.58, 95% CI: 3.81-7.35, P < .00001). Finally, the overall pooled analysis confirmed that rTMS could not significantly reduce Hamilton anxiety scale and Hamilton depression scale scores in subgroup analyses of follow-up period, RLS subtype, or rTMS frequency (P > .05).

Conclusion: rTMS might alleviate core limb discomfort symptoms measured by IRLS-RS and improve sleep quality assessed by PSQI in patients with RLS. However, rTMS might not be effective in improving symptoms of anxiety and depression. To further confirm the conclusion, more large randomized controlled trials are necessary.

反复经颅磁刺激治疗不宁腿综合征:荟萃分析。
背景:反复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗不宁腿综合征(RLS)患者的益处尚不确定。本研究旨在探讨rTMS治疗RLS的疗效。方法:检索PubMed、EMbase、Cochrane图书馆、中国国家知识基础设施和万方数据库自建库至2026年5月1日的文献。纳入了比较rTMS和假刺激的符合条件的研究。使用Review Manager Version 5.3分析数据。结果:meta分析纳入了4项研究。综合分析证实rTMS可有效降低国际rls评定量表(IRLS-RS)评分(平均差值[MD] = 6.46, 95%可信区间[CI]: 4.44 ~ 8.48, P .05)。结论:rTMS可减轻RLS- rs测量的核心肢体不适症状,改善PSQI评估的睡眠质量。然而,rTMS可能对改善焦虑和抑郁症状无效。为了进一步证实这一结论,需要更多的大型随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书