A quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia using the AGREE II instrument: A systematic review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
YeEun Hong, JungGun Park, Jaehyun Yoo, Kyuseok Kim
{"title":"A quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia using the AGREE II instrument: A systematic review.","authors":"YeEun Hong, JungGun Park, Jaehyun Yoo, Kyuseok Kim","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000051100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study systematically assesses the methodological quality of both Western and traditional medicine clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for herpes zoster (HZ) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted up to January 10, 2025 to identify CPGs for HZ or PHN, regardless of whether they were based on Western or traditional medicine. All CPGs addressing diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, prevention, and management were included. Two evaluators independently screened the records and extracted the data. The quality of the CPGs was independently assessed by 5 evaluators using the AGREE II instrument. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven CPGs were included, consisting of ten from Western medicine and 1 from traditional medicine. The AGREE II domain scores were as follows: The \"Clarity of Presentation\" domain received the highest score (76.2%), whereas \"Editorial Independence,\" \"Stakeholder Involvement,\" and \"Applicability\" scored below 30%, with \"Applicability\" receiving the lowest score (10.9%). Inter-rater reliability was excellent, with ICCs for the AGREE II domains ranging from 0.927 to 0.990. Four CPGs were rated as Moderate quality (Recommended with modifications), and 6 CPGs were of Low quality (Not recommended). Among the Western medicine CPGs, JASP 2021 was the only 1 rated as High quality (Recommended), whereas CACMS 2013, the only traditional medicine CPG, was rated as Low quality (Not recommended).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings reveal considerable variability in quality, with overall low-to-moderate quality observed in the guidelines for HZ and PHN. These results highlight the need to address the domains with consistently low scores identified by the AGREE II instrument by adopting a multidisciplinary approach, strengthening applicability, and ensuring rigor in the development process to improve guideline quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"105 42","pages":"e51100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13681107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000051100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study systematically assesses the methodological quality of both Western and traditional medicine clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for herpes zoster (HZ) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted up to January 10, 2025 to identify CPGs for HZ or PHN, regardless of whether they were based on Western or traditional medicine. All CPGs addressing diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, prevention, and management were included. Two evaluators independently screened the records and extracted the data. The quality of the CPGs was independently assessed by 5 evaluators using the AGREE II instrument. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess inter-rater reliability.

Results: Eleven CPGs were included, consisting of ten from Western medicine and 1 from traditional medicine. The AGREE II domain scores were as follows: The "Clarity of Presentation" domain received the highest score (76.2%), whereas "Editorial Independence," "Stakeholder Involvement," and "Applicability" scored below 30%, with "Applicability" receiving the lowest score (10.9%). Inter-rater reliability was excellent, with ICCs for the AGREE II domains ranging from 0.927 to 0.990. Four CPGs were rated as Moderate quality (Recommended with modifications), and 6 CPGs were of Low quality (Not recommended). Among the Western medicine CPGs, JASP 2021 was the only 1 rated as High quality (Recommended), whereas CACMS 2013, the only traditional medicine CPG, was rated as Low quality (Not recommended).

Conclusion: The findings reveal considerable variability in quality, with overall low-to-moderate quality observed in the guidelines for HZ and PHN. These results highlight the need to address the domains with consistently low scores identified by the AGREE II instrument by adopting a multidisciplinary approach, strengthening applicability, and ensuring rigor in the development process to improve guideline quality.

使用AGREE II仪器对带状疱疹和带状疱疹后神经痛临床实践指南的质量评价:一项系统评价。
背景:本研究使用指南研究与评估评估(AGREE II)工具系统地评估了带状疱疹(HZ)和带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)的西医和传统医学临床实践指南(CPGs)的方法学质量。方法:系统检索至2025年1月10日,以确定HZ或PHN的CPGs,无论其基于西医还是传统医学。所有涉及诊断、评估、治疗、预防和管理的cpg均被纳入。两名评估人员独立筛选记录并提取数据。CPGs的质量由5名评估员使用AGREE II仪器独立评估。计算类别内相关系数(ICC)以评估类别间的信度。结果:共纳入11个cpg,其中西药10个,中药1个。AGREE II领域得分如下:“表述清晰”领域得分最高(76.2%),而“编辑独立性”、“利益相关者参与”和“适用性”得分低于30%,“适用性”得分最低(10.9%)。评估间信度极好,AGREE II域的ICCs范围为0.927至0.990。4个cpg被评为中等质量(建议修改),6个cpg被评为低质量(不推荐)。在西药CPG中,只有JASP 2021被评为高质量(推荐),而唯一的传统药CPG CACMS 2013被评为低质量(不推荐)。结论:研究结果显示在质量上存在相当大的差异,在HZ和PHN的指南中观察到总体的低到中等质量。这些结果强调需要通过采用多学科方法,加强适用性,并确保制定过程中的严谨性来解决由AGREE II工具确定的持续低分的领域,以提高指南质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书