Development and internal validation of a conditional failure-to-rescue prediction model after surgery for metastatic spine disease.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Esli Nájera Samaniego, Ali Haider Bangash, Victoria Cao, Alexander Alexandrov, Liza Belman, Temitope Adegbenro, Saikiran Murthy, Yaroslav Gelfand, Reza Yassari, Rafael De la Garza Ramos
{"title":"Development and internal validation of a conditional failure-to-rescue prediction model after surgery for metastatic spine disease.","authors":"Esli Nájera Samaniego, Ali Haider Bangash, Victoria Cao, Alexander Alexandrov, Liza Belman, Temitope Adegbenro, Saikiran Murthy, Yaroslav Gelfand, Reza Yassari, Rafael De la Garza Ramos","doi":"10.3171/2026.4.SPINE26196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop and internally validate an optimal patient-level prediction model for conditional failure to rescue (cFTR) after surgery for spinal metastases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors performed a retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2018 to 2023. The primary endpoint was cFTR, defined as 30-day postoperative mortality among patients who experienced at least 1 major complication following surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to predict cFTR. Model performance was assessed using discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]), calibration, and information criteria (Akaike and Bayesian). Penalized regression (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and elastic net) was performed to evaluate robustness. Internal validation was conducted using 5-fold cross-validation and bootstrap resampling. Reporting of model development followed the TRIPOD statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 338 patients who experienced at least 1 major postoperative complication, 71 (21%) died within 30 days. Emergency surgery was found to be the strongest predictor of cFTR. In the final 6-predictor clinical model, emergency surgery, current smoking, higher preoperative white blood cell count, lower serum albumin, and functional dependence were associated with increased odds of cFTR. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC = 0.740) and acceptable calibration, with minimal optimism on internal validation (cross-validated AUC = 0.713, bootstrap mean AUC = 0.743). Penalized regression models demonstrated slightly higher discrimination but offered limited incremental benefit over the clinical mode. Secondary analyses showed that nonsurvivors experienced a higher burden of complications and disproportionately severe cardiopulmonary and infectious events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with metastatic spinal tumors who experienced major postoperative complications, cFTR remained common and was largely driven by patient-level vulnerability. Conditioning on the occurrence of complications highlighted emergency presentation, impaired physiological reserve, systemic inflammation, and functional dependence as key determinants of mortality. This internally validated model provides a transparent framework for risk stratification after complications and identified potentially modifiable targets for perioperative optimization. External validation is needed to establish generalizability and clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2026.4.SPINE26196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and internally validate an optimal patient-level prediction model for conditional failure to rescue (cFTR) after surgery for spinal metastases.

Methods: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2018 to 2023. The primary endpoint was cFTR, defined as 30-day postoperative mortality among patients who experienced at least 1 major complication following surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to predict cFTR. Model performance was assessed using discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]), calibration, and information criteria (Akaike and Bayesian). Penalized regression (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and elastic net) was performed to evaluate robustness. Internal validation was conducted using 5-fold cross-validation and bootstrap resampling. Reporting of model development followed the TRIPOD statement.

Results: Among 338 patients who experienced at least 1 major postoperative complication, 71 (21%) died within 30 days. Emergency surgery was found to be the strongest predictor of cFTR. In the final 6-predictor clinical model, emergency surgery, current smoking, higher preoperative white blood cell count, lower serum albumin, and functional dependence were associated with increased odds of cFTR. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC = 0.740) and acceptable calibration, with minimal optimism on internal validation (cross-validated AUC = 0.713, bootstrap mean AUC = 0.743). Penalized regression models demonstrated slightly higher discrimination but offered limited incremental benefit over the clinical mode. Secondary analyses showed that nonsurvivors experienced a higher burden of complications and disproportionately severe cardiopulmonary and infectious events.

Conclusions: Among patients with metastatic spinal tumors who experienced major postoperative complications, cFTR remained common and was largely driven by patient-level vulnerability. Conditioning on the occurrence of complications highlighted emergency presentation, impaired physiological reserve, systemic inflammation, and functional dependence as key determinants of mortality. This internally validated model provides a transparent framework for risk stratification after complications and identified potentially modifiable targets for perioperative optimization. External validation is needed to establish generalizability and clinical utility.

转移性脊柱疾病术后条件性抢救失败预测模型的建立和内部验证。
目的:本研究的目的是开发并内部验证脊柱转移术后条件性抢救失败(cFTR)的最佳患者水平预测模型。方法:作者对2018年至2023年美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划数据库进行回顾性分析。主要终点是cFTR,定义为转移性脊柱肿瘤手术后出现至少1个主要并发症的患者术后30天死亡率。建立了单变量和多变量logistic回归模型来预测cFTR。使用鉴别(受试者工作特征曲线下面积[AUC])、校准和信息标准(赤池和贝叶斯)评估模型性能。惩罚回归(最小绝对收缩和选择算子,弹性网)进行评估稳健性。内部验证采用5次交叉验证和自举重采样进行。模型开发报告遵循TRIPOD声明。结果:338例出现至少1个主要术后并发症的患者中,71例(21%)在30天内死亡。发现急诊手术是cFTR的最强预测因子。在最终的6个预测因子临床模型中,急诊手术、当前吸烟、术前较高的白细胞计数、较低的血清白蛋白和功能依赖与cFTR的发生率增加相关。该模型具有良好的判别性(AUC = 0.740)和可接受的校准,对内部验证具有最小的乐观度(交叉验证AUC = 0.713, bootstrap平均AUC = 0.743)。惩罚回归模型显示略高的歧视,但提供有限的增量效益比临床模式。二次分析表明,非幸存者经历了更高的并发症负担和不成比例的严重心肺和感染事件。结论:在发生重大术后并发症的转移性脊柱肿瘤患者中,cFTR仍然很常见,并且在很大程度上是由患者层面的易感性驱动的。并发症发生的条件强调急诊表现、生理储备受损、全身性炎症和功能依赖是死亡率的关键决定因素。这个内部验证的模型为并发症后的风险分层提供了一个透明的框架,并确定了围手术期优化的潜在可修改目标。需要外部验证来建立推广和临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书