Exploring the impact of spontaneous intestinal perforation and necrotizing enterocolitis treatment modality on shunt outcomes in premature infants.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Katherine Chandler, Goeto Dantes, Olivia A Keane, Karissa McCright, Michael Sawvel, Amina Bhatia
{"title":"Exploring the impact of spontaneous intestinal perforation and necrotizing enterocolitis treatment modality on shunt outcomes in premature infants.","authors":"Katherine Chandler, Goeto Dantes, Olivia A Keane, Karissa McCright, Michael Sawvel, Amina Bhatia","doi":"10.3171/2026.3.PEDS25507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) are common complications in premature infants. SIP and NEC may require surgery, including peritoneal drainage (PD) and/or laparotomy. PHH typically requires shunting, generally using either a ventriculoperitoneal (VPS) or ventriculoatrial (VAS) shunt. The authors hypothesized that prior abdominal instrumentation with possible adhesion formation in patients undergoing laparotomy may affect VPS placement and longevity. This study examined the impact of SIP or NEC treatment on shunt outcomes in 43 premature infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of infants treated for SIP or NEC and PHH at the authors' institution from 2007 to 2024 was conducted. SIP/NEC treatment modality and shunt outcomes were extracted from the electronic medical record. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test and nonparametric variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three eligible patients were identified (23.3% female, 76.7% Black), the majority of whom were diagnosed with SIP (72.1%). Most patients were treated with laparotomy (65.1%), with only 34.9% receiving definitive PD. A VPS was the predominant shunt type (81.4%), with a VAS being less common (18.6%). Among patients with VPS placement, 51.4% required distal (peritoneal catheter) revision. When comparing shunt outcomes between infants treated with laparotomy versus PD, primary shunt type selection was significantly different, with all cases of initial VAS placement occurring in the laparotomy group (p = 0.04). Patients who underwent laparotomy were also significantly older at initial shunt placement (median 126.5 vs 94 days, p < 0.01) and had a longer period between SIP/NEC treatment and shunt placement (median 100 vs 77 days, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the rate of distal VPS revision (p = 0.63), number of VPS revisions required (p = 0.38), or rates of conversion from a VPS to a VAS (p = 0.14) between the laparotomy and PD cohorts. However, infants who underwent definitive PD were significantly more likely to have a VPS maintained, even if revision was required, without conversion to a VAS (80.0% vs 39.3%, p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective review of 43 premature infants with SIP or NEC and PHH, definitive PD was associated with higher rates of initial VPS placement and long-term maintenance compared with laparotomy. Although limited by a small sample size, these findings suggest that initial SIP/NEC treatment type may influence VPS longevity. Recognizing the role of prior abdominal surgery may inform neurosurgical decision-making and minimize shunt revisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2026.3.PEDS25507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) are common complications in premature infants. SIP and NEC may require surgery, including peritoneal drainage (PD) and/or laparotomy. PHH typically requires shunting, generally using either a ventriculoperitoneal (VPS) or ventriculoatrial (VAS) shunt. The authors hypothesized that prior abdominal instrumentation with possible adhesion formation in patients undergoing laparotomy may affect VPS placement and longevity. This study examined the impact of SIP or NEC treatment on shunt outcomes in 43 premature infants.

Methods: A retrospective review of infants treated for SIP or NEC and PHH at the authors' institution from 2007 to 2024 was conducted. SIP/NEC treatment modality and shunt outcomes were extracted from the electronic medical record. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test and nonparametric variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results: Forty-three eligible patients were identified (23.3% female, 76.7% Black), the majority of whom were diagnosed with SIP (72.1%). Most patients were treated with laparotomy (65.1%), with only 34.9% receiving definitive PD. A VPS was the predominant shunt type (81.4%), with a VAS being less common (18.6%). Among patients with VPS placement, 51.4% required distal (peritoneal catheter) revision. When comparing shunt outcomes between infants treated with laparotomy versus PD, primary shunt type selection was significantly different, with all cases of initial VAS placement occurring in the laparotomy group (p = 0.04). Patients who underwent laparotomy were also significantly older at initial shunt placement (median 126.5 vs 94 days, p < 0.01) and had a longer period between SIP/NEC treatment and shunt placement (median 100 vs 77 days, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the rate of distal VPS revision (p = 0.63), number of VPS revisions required (p = 0.38), or rates of conversion from a VPS to a VAS (p = 0.14) between the laparotomy and PD cohorts. However, infants who underwent definitive PD were significantly more likely to have a VPS maintained, even if revision was required, without conversion to a VAS (80.0% vs 39.3%, p = 0.01).

Conclusions: In this retrospective review of 43 premature infants with SIP or NEC and PHH, definitive PD was associated with higher rates of initial VPS placement and long-term maintenance compared with laparotomy. Although limited by a small sample size, these findings suggest that initial SIP/NEC treatment type may influence VPS longevity. Recognizing the role of prior abdominal surgery may inform neurosurgical decision-making and minimize shunt revisions.

探讨自发性肠穿孔和坏死性小肠结肠炎治疗方式对早产儿分流结局的影响。
目的:自发性肠穿孔(SIP)、坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)和出血性脑积水(PHH)是早产儿常见的并发症。SIP和NEC可能需要手术,包括腹膜引流(PD)和/或剖腹手术。PHH通常需要分流,通常使用心室-腹膜(VPS)或心室-心房(VAS)分流。作者假设,在剖腹手术的患者中,先前腹部内固定可能形成粘连,这可能会影响VPS的放置和寿命。本研究检查了43例早产儿SIP或NEC治疗对分流结局的影响。方法:回顾性分析2007年至2024年在作者所在机构接受SIP或NEC和PHH治疗的婴儿。从电子病历中提取SIP/NEC治疗方式和分流结果。分类变量分析采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验,非参数变量分析采用Mann-Whitney u检验。结果:确定了43例符合条件的患者(女性23.3%,黑人76.7%),其中大多数诊断为SIP(72.1%)。大多数患者采用剖腹手术治疗(65.1%),只有34.9%的患者接受了最终PD。VPS是主要的分流类型(81.4%),VAS较少见(18.6%)。在放置VPS的患者中,51.4%需要远端(腹膜导管)翻修。当比较剖腹手术组和PD组的分流结局时,初级分流类型的选择有显著差异,所有的初始VAS放置病例都发生在剖腹手术组(p = 0.04)。接受剖腹手术的患者在初始分流器放置时也明显年龄较大(中位126.5 vs 94天,p < 0.01),并且在SIP/NEC治疗和分流器放置之间的时间较长(中位100 vs 77天,p = 0.04)。在剖腹手术组和PD组之间,远端VPS翻修率(p = 0.63)、VPS翻修次数(p = 0.38)或从VPS到VAS的转换率(p = 0.14)均无显著差异。然而,接受明确PD的婴儿更有可能维持VPS,即使需要修改,而不转换为VAS (80.0% vs 39.3%, p = 0.01)。结论:在这项对43名SIP或NEC合并PHH的早产儿的回顾性研究中,与剖腹手术相比,最终PD与更高的初始VPS放置率和长期维持率相关。虽然受限于小样本量,但这些发现表明初始SIP/NEC治疗类型可能影响VPS寿命。认识到既往腹部手术的作用可以为神经外科决策提供信息,并最大限度地减少分流术的修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
307
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localiced
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书