{"title":"Osteoporosis in the Oldest Old - From Diagnosis to Treatment: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Hans Peter Dimai, Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch","doi":"10.1159/ger/acxag010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporosis and fragility fractures are major causes of disability, loss of independence, institutionalization, and mortality in the oldest old. Despite their exceptionally high fracture risk, adults aged ≥80 years remain underrepresented in randomized controlled trials. Diagnosis and treatment are complicated by the interaction of skeletal fragility with falls, sarcopenia, frailty, multimorbidity, cognitive and functional impairment, and competing mortality.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This narrative review discusses the diagnosis, fracture-risk assessment, non-pharmacological management, and pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis in the oldest old. Bone mineral density (BMD) remains central to osteoporosis diagnosis but incompletely characterizes fracture risk at advanced age. Previous and particularly recent fractures, prevalent vertebral fractures, falls, physical performance, nutritional status, and frailty provide complementary information. Interpretation of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool FRAX® requires particular consideration in the oldest old because competing mortality may cause 10-year fracture probabilities to plateau or decline despite increasing age-specific fracture incidence; FRAXplus® incorporates additional risk modifiers, including falls and the number and recency of previous fractures. Non-pharmacological interventions addressing nutrition, muscle function, balance, and falls complement bone-directed pharmacotherapy. Available evidence does not indicate that chronological age itself attenuates the efficacy of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, although direct randomized fracture-endpoint evidence in adults aged ≥80 years remains limited. Risedronate and, historically, strontium ranelate provide some of the clearest fracture data specifically in this age group, whereas evidence for most other therapies derives from older-subgroup analyses, skeletal efficacy studies, observational data, or extrapolation from pivotal trials. At advanced age, renal function, cognition, mobility, adherence, caregiver support, and continuity of care increasingly influence the translation of efficacy into clinical effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Fracture risk in the oldest old reflects the interaction of skeletal fragility with falls, frailty, sarcopenia, and functional reserve. Available evidence supports preservation of pharmacological antifracture efficacy with advancing age, but direct evidence in octogenarians and particularly nonagenarians remains scarce. Treatment feasibility and continuity of care become increasingly relevant at advanced age. Greater representation of the oldest old in clinical trials is needed, with particular attention to fracture outcomes, treatment sequencing, time to benefit, and outcomes relevant to independence and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":12662,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/ger/acxag010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Osteoporosis and fragility fractures are major causes of disability, loss of independence, institutionalization, and mortality in the oldest old. Despite their exceptionally high fracture risk, adults aged ≥80 years remain underrepresented in randomized controlled trials. Diagnosis and treatment are complicated by the interaction of skeletal fragility with falls, sarcopenia, frailty, multimorbidity, cognitive and functional impairment, and competing mortality.
Summary: This narrative review discusses the diagnosis, fracture-risk assessment, non-pharmacological management, and pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis in the oldest old. Bone mineral density (BMD) remains central to osteoporosis diagnosis but incompletely characterizes fracture risk at advanced age. Previous and particularly recent fractures, prevalent vertebral fractures, falls, physical performance, nutritional status, and frailty provide complementary information. Interpretation of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool FRAX® requires particular consideration in the oldest old because competing mortality may cause 10-year fracture probabilities to plateau or decline despite increasing age-specific fracture incidence; FRAXplus® incorporates additional risk modifiers, including falls and the number and recency of previous fractures. Non-pharmacological interventions addressing nutrition, muscle function, balance, and falls complement bone-directed pharmacotherapy. Available evidence does not indicate that chronological age itself attenuates the efficacy of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, although direct randomized fracture-endpoint evidence in adults aged ≥80 years remains limited. Risedronate and, historically, strontium ranelate provide some of the clearest fracture data specifically in this age group, whereas evidence for most other therapies derives from older-subgroup analyses, skeletal efficacy studies, observational data, or extrapolation from pivotal trials. At advanced age, renal function, cognition, mobility, adherence, caregiver support, and continuity of care increasingly influence the translation of efficacy into clinical effectiveness.
Key messages: Fracture risk in the oldest old reflects the interaction of skeletal fragility with falls, frailty, sarcopenia, and functional reserve. Available evidence supports preservation of pharmacological antifracture efficacy with advancing age, but direct evidence in octogenarians and particularly nonagenarians remains scarce. Treatment feasibility and continuity of care become increasingly relevant at advanced age. Greater representation of the oldest old in clinical trials is needed, with particular attention to fracture outcomes, treatment sequencing, time to benefit, and outcomes relevant to independence and quality of life.
期刊介绍:
In view of the ever-increasing fraction of elderly people, understanding the mechanisms of aging and age-related diseases has become a matter of urgent necessity. ''Gerontology'', the oldest journal in the field, responds to this need by drawing topical contributions from multiple disciplines to support the fundamental goals of extending active life and enhancing its quality. The range of papers is classified into four sections. In the Clinical Section, the aetiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of agerelated diseases are discussed from a gerontological rather than a geriatric viewpoint. The Experimental Section contains up-to-date contributions from basic gerontological research. Papers dealing with behavioural development and related topics are placed in the Behavioural Science Section. Basic aspects of regeneration in different experimental biological systems as well as in the context of medical applications are dealt with in a special section that also contains information on technological advances for the elderly. Providing a primary source of high-quality papers covering all aspects of aging in humans and animals, ''Gerontology'' serves as an ideal information tool for all readers interested in the topic of aging from a broad perspective.