Osteoporosis in the Oldest Old - From Diagnosis to Treatment: A Narrative Review.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Gerontology Pub Date : 2026-10-16 DOI:10.1159/ger/acxag010
Hans Peter Dimai, Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch
{"title":"Osteoporosis in the Oldest Old - From Diagnosis to Treatment: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Hans Peter Dimai, Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch","doi":"10.1159/ger/acxag010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporosis and fragility fractures are major causes of disability, loss of independence, institutionalization, and mortality in the oldest old. Despite their exceptionally high fracture risk, adults aged ≥80 years remain underrepresented in randomized controlled trials. Diagnosis and treatment are complicated by the interaction of skeletal fragility with falls, sarcopenia, frailty, multimorbidity, cognitive and functional impairment, and competing mortality.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This narrative review discusses the diagnosis, fracture-risk assessment, non-pharmacological management, and pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis in the oldest old. Bone mineral density (BMD) remains central to osteoporosis diagnosis but incompletely characterizes fracture risk at advanced age. Previous and particularly recent fractures, prevalent vertebral fractures, falls, physical performance, nutritional status, and frailty provide complementary information. Interpretation of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool FRAX® requires particular consideration in the oldest old because competing mortality may cause 10-year fracture probabilities to plateau or decline despite increasing age-specific fracture incidence; FRAXplus® incorporates additional risk modifiers, including falls and the number and recency of previous fractures. Non-pharmacological interventions addressing nutrition, muscle function, balance, and falls complement bone-directed pharmacotherapy. Available evidence does not indicate that chronological age itself attenuates the efficacy of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, although direct randomized fracture-endpoint evidence in adults aged ≥80 years remains limited. Risedronate and, historically, strontium ranelate provide some of the clearest fracture data specifically in this age group, whereas evidence for most other therapies derives from older-subgroup analyses, skeletal efficacy studies, observational data, or extrapolation from pivotal trials. At advanced age, renal function, cognition, mobility, adherence, caregiver support, and continuity of care increasingly influence the translation of efficacy into clinical effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Fracture risk in the oldest old reflects the interaction of skeletal fragility with falls, frailty, sarcopenia, and functional reserve. Available evidence supports preservation of pharmacological antifracture efficacy with advancing age, but direct evidence in octogenarians and particularly nonagenarians remains scarce. Treatment feasibility and continuity of care become increasingly relevant at advanced age. Greater representation of the oldest old in clinical trials is needed, with particular attention to fracture outcomes, treatment sequencing, time to benefit, and outcomes relevant to independence and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":12662,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/ger/acxag010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoporosis and fragility fractures are major causes of disability, loss of independence, institutionalization, and mortality in the oldest old. Despite their exceptionally high fracture risk, adults aged ≥80 years remain underrepresented in randomized controlled trials. Diagnosis and treatment are complicated by the interaction of skeletal fragility with falls, sarcopenia, frailty, multimorbidity, cognitive and functional impairment, and competing mortality.

Summary: This narrative review discusses the diagnosis, fracture-risk assessment, non-pharmacological management, and pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis in the oldest old. Bone mineral density (BMD) remains central to osteoporosis diagnosis but incompletely characterizes fracture risk at advanced age. Previous and particularly recent fractures, prevalent vertebral fractures, falls, physical performance, nutritional status, and frailty provide complementary information. Interpretation of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool FRAX® requires particular consideration in the oldest old because competing mortality may cause 10-year fracture probabilities to plateau or decline despite increasing age-specific fracture incidence; FRAXplus® incorporates additional risk modifiers, including falls and the number and recency of previous fractures. Non-pharmacological interventions addressing nutrition, muscle function, balance, and falls complement bone-directed pharmacotherapy. Available evidence does not indicate that chronological age itself attenuates the efficacy of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, although direct randomized fracture-endpoint evidence in adults aged ≥80 years remains limited. Risedronate and, historically, strontium ranelate provide some of the clearest fracture data specifically in this age group, whereas evidence for most other therapies derives from older-subgroup analyses, skeletal efficacy studies, observational data, or extrapolation from pivotal trials. At advanced age, renal function, cognition, mobility, adherence, caregiver support, and continuity of care increasingly influence the translation of efficacy into clinical effectiveness.

Key messages: Fracture risk in the oldest old reflects the interaction of skeletal fragility with falls, frailty, sarcopenia, and functional reserve. Available evidence supports preservation of pharmacological antifracture efficacy with advancing age, but direct evidence in octogenarians and particularly nonagenarians remains scarce. Treatment feasibility and continuity of care become increasingly relevant at advanced age. Greater representation of the oldest old in clinical trials is needed, with particular attention to fracture outcomes, treatment sequencing, time to benefit, and outcomes relevant to independence and quality of life.

老年骨质疏松症-从诊断到治疗:叙述性回顾。
背景:骨质疏松和脆性骨折是老年人致残、丧失独立性、住院和死亡的主要原因。尽管有极高的骨折风险,但在随机对照试验中,年龄≥80岁的成年人仍未被充分代表。由于骨骼脆弱与跌倒、肌肉减少、虚弱、多病、认知和功能障碍以及竞争性死亡率的相互作用,诊断和治疗变得复杂。摘要:本文综述了老年骨质疏松症的诊断、骨折风险评估、非药物治疗和药物治疗。骨密度(BMD)仍然是骨质疏松症诊断的核心,但不能完全表征老年骨折风险。以前和特别是最近的骨折,常见的椎体骨折,跌倒,身体表现,营养状况和虚弱提供了补充信息。骨折风险评估工具FRAX®的解释需要特别考虑老年人,因为尽管年龄特异性骨折发生率增加,但竞争性死亡率可能导致10年骨折概率趋于平稳或下降;FRAXplus®纳入了额外的风险调节剂,包括跌倒、先前骨折的次数和近期。针对营养、肌肉功能、平衡和跌倒的非药物干预是骨导向药物治疗的补充。尽管在≥80岁成人中直接随机骨折终点的证据仍然有限,但现有证据并未表明实足年龄本身会减弱骨质疏松药物治疗的疗效。利塞膦酸钠和雷奈酸锶在历史上为该年龄组提供了一些最清晰的骨折数据,而大多数其他治疗的证据来自老年亚组分析、骨骼疗效研究、观察数据或关键试验的推断。在高龄时,肾功能、认知、活动能力、依从性、护理者支持和护理的连续性越来越多地影响疗效转化为临床疗效。关键信息:老年人的骨折风险反映了骨骼脆弱性与跌倒、虚弱、肌肉减少和功能储备的相互作用。现有的证据支持随着年龄的增长,药物抗骨折的有效性保持不变,但直接证据在八十多岁,特别是九十多岁的人仍然很少。治疗的可行性和护理的连续性在老年变得越来越重要。需要在临床试验中更多地代表老年人,特别关注骨折结局、治疗顺序、获益时间以及与独立性和生活质量相关的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontology
Gerontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In view of the ever-increasing fraction of elderly people, understanding the mechanisms of aging and age-related diseases has become a matter of urgent necessity. ''Gerontology'', the oldest journal in the field, responds to this need by drawing topical contributions from multiple disciplines to support the fundamental goals of extending active life and enhancing its quality. The range of papers is classified into four sections. In the Clinical Section, the aetiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of agerelated diseases are discussed from a gerontological rather than a geriatric viewpoint. The Experimental Section contains up-to-date contributions from basic gerontological research. Papers dealing with behavioural development and related topics are placed in the Behavioural Science Section. Basic aspects of regeneration in different experimental biological systems as well as in the context of medical applications are dealt with in a special section that also contains information on technological advances for the elderly. Providing a primary source of high-quality papers covering all aspects of aging in humans and animals, ''Gerontology'' serves as an ideal information tool for all readers interested in the topic of aging from a broad perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书